scholarly journals The repeatability of an oral glucose test in ponies

2016 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 238-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. de Laat ◽  
M. N. Sillence
Keyword(s):  
Oral Glucose ◽  
Glucose Test ◽  
Oral Glucose Test

Asians React Differently to Oral Glucose Test

Ob Gyn News ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 15
Author(s):  
TIMOTHY F. KIRN
Keyword(s):  
Oral Glucose ◽  
Glucose Test ◽  
Oral Glucose Test

Clinical features and natural course of acromegaly in patients with discordance in the nadir GH level on the oral glucose test and the IGF-1 value at 3 months after adenomectomy

2016 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasuyuki Kinoshita ◽  
Atsushi Tominaga ◽  
Satoshi Usui ◽  
Kazunori Arita ◽  
Tetsuhiko Sakoguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Features ◽  
Natural Course ◽  
Oral Glucose ◽  
Glucose Test ◽  
Oral Glucose Test

Chronic metformin intake improves anaerobic but not aerobic capacity in healthy rats

2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-28
Author(s):  
Gustavo Gomes de Araujo ◽  
Sara Learsi ◽  
Victor José Bastos-Silva ◽  
Terezinha Ataide ◽  
Adriano Eduardo Lima-Silva
Keyword(s):  
Aerobic Capacity ◽  
Area Under Curve ◽  
Anaerobic Capacity ◽  
Work Capacity ◽  
Oral Glucose ◽  
Anaerobic Work Capacity ◽  
Anaerobic Work ◽  
Glucose Test ◽  
Oral Glucose Test ◽  
Aerobic And Anaerobic

The effect of chronic metformin intake on aerobic and anaerobic capacity was examined in healthy rats. Twenty rats completed 10 days of metformin (MET) ingestion (250 mg). After this period, the animals performed four high-intensity bouts until exhaustion at 9%, 11%, 13%, and 15% of body mass (BM) in swimming, separated by 24 h, with prior metformin (250 mg) or placebo (PL). The critical load (CL) and anaerobic work capacity (AWC – W′) were calculated and considered aerobic and anaerobic capacity, respectively. There was no difference in CL between the MET and PL groups (p > 0.05). The AWC – W′ was higher in the MET group than in the PL group (p = 0.004). Time until exhaustion (seconds) at all bouts were higher (p < 0.004) in the MET group (9% of BM = 434.5 ± 267.3, 11% of BM = 269.6 ± 214.2, 13% of BM = 174.0 ± 40.9, 15% of BM = 146.6 ± 15.9) compared to the PL group (9% of BM = 96.4 ± 22.3, 11% of BM = 65.5 ± 13.4, 13% of BM = 51.1 ± 5.5, 15% of BM = 40.8 ± 7.5). Glucose concentration was higher at 90 and 120 min than at 0 and 30 min for the MET group (intragroup) during the oral glucose test tolerance; there was no difference between the MET and PL groups for area under curve. MET ingestion enhances AWC – W′ and times to exhaustion but not aerobic capacity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document