Co‐option and the evolution of food sharing in vampire bats

Ethology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 127 (10) ◽  
pp. 837-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald G. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Food Sharing ◽  
Vampire Bats

scholarly journals Social foraging in vampire bats is predicted by long-term cooperative relationships

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simon P. Ripperger ◽  
Gerald G. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Social Evolution ◽  
Group Living ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Social Foraging ◽  
Social Grooming ◽  
Cooperative Relationships ◽  
Vampire Bats ◽  
In Captivity ◽  
Access To Food

AbstractStable social bonds in group-living animals can provide greater access to food. A striking example is that female vampire bats often regurgitate blood to socially bonded kin and nonkin that failed in their nightly hunt. Food-sharing relationships form via preferred associations and social grooming within roosts. However, it remains unclear whether these cooperative relationships extend beyond the roost. To evaluate if long-term cooperative relationships in vampire bats play a role in foraging, we tested if foraging encounters measured by proximity sensors could be explained by wild roosting proximity, kinship, or rates of co-feeding, social grooming, and food sharing during 22 months in captivity. We assessed evidence for six hypothetical scenarios of social foraging, ranging from individual to collective hunting. We found that female vampire bats departed their roost individually, but often re-united far outside the roost. Nonrandomly repeating foraging encounters were predicted by within-roost association and histories of cooperation in captivity, even when controlling for kinship. Foraging bats demonstrated both affiliative and competitive interactions and a previously undescribed call type. We suggest that social foraging could have implications for social evolution if ‘local’ cooperation within the roost and ‘global’ competition outside the roost enhances fitness interdependence between frequent roostmates.

scholarly journals Development of New Food-Sharing Relationships in Vampire Bats

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (7) ◽  
pp. 1275-1279.e3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald G. Carter ◽  
Damien R. Farine ◽  
Rachel J. Crisp ◽  
Julia K. Vrtilek ◽  
Simon P. Ripperger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Sharing ◽  
Vampire Bats

scholarly journals Social dominance and cooperation in female vampire bats

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 210266
Author(s):  
Rachel J. Crisp ◽  
Lauren J. N. Brent ◽  
Gerald G. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Dominance Hierarchy ◽  
Social Rank ◽  
Group Living ◽  
Experimental System ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Competitive Interactions ◽  
Female Dominance ◽  
Cooperative Relationships ◽  
Vampire Bats ◽  
In The Wild

When group-living animals develop individualized social relationships, they often regulate cooperation and conflict through a dominance hierarchy. Female common vampire bats have been an experimental system for studying cooperative relationships, yet surprisingly little is known about female conflict. Here, we recorded the outcomes of 1023 competitive interactions over food provided ad libitum in a captive colony of 33 vampire bats (24 adult females and their young). We found a weakly linear dominance hierarchy using three common metrics (Landau's h ’ measure of linearity, triangle transitivity and directional consistency). However, patterns of female dominance were less structured than in many other group-living mammals. Female social rank was not clearly predicted by body size, age, nor reproductive status, and competitive interactions were not correlated with kinship, grooming nor food sharing. We therefore found no evidence that females groomed or shared food up a hierarchy or that differences in rank explained asymmetries in grooming or food sharing. A possible explanation for such apparently egalitarian relationships among female vampire bats is the scale of competition. Female vampire bats that are frequent roostmates might not often directly compete for food in the wild.

A Model of Social Organization and the Evolution of Food Sharing in Vampire Bats

2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-238 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mario Paolucci ◽  
Rosaria Conte ◽  
Gennaro Di Tosto
Keyword(s):  
Social Organization ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Vampire Bats

scholarly journals Food-sharing vampire bats are more nepotistic under conditions of perceived risk

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 565-569 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald G. Carter ◽  
Gerald S. Wilkinson ◽  
Rachel A. Page
Keyword(s):  
Perceived Risk ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Vampire Bats

Isotopic Data Do Not Support Food Sharing Within Large Networks of Female Vampire Bats (Desmodus rotundus)

Ethology ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian C. Voigt ◽  
Silke L. Voigt-Heucke ◽  
Karin Schneeberger
Keyword(s):  
Food Sharing ◽  
Isotopic Data ◽  
Large Networks ◽  
Desmodus Rotundus ◽  
Vampire Bats

scholarly journals Food sharing in vampire bats: reciprocal help predicts donations more than relatedness or harassment

2013 ◽  
Vol 280 (1753) ◽  
pp. 20122573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald G. Carter ◽  
Gerald S. Wilkinson
Keyword(s):  
Kin Selection ◽  
Kin Recognition ◽  
Social Bonding ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Past Work ◽  
Vampire Bats ◽  
Helping Behaviour ◽  
Indirect Fitness ◽  
Fitness Benefits ◽  
Recognition Errors

Common vampire bats often regurgitate food to roost-mates that fail to feed. The original explanation for this costly helping behaviour invoked both direct and indirect fitness benefits. Several authors have since suggested that food sharing is maintained solely by indirect fitness because non-kin food sharing could have resulted from kin recognition errors, indiscriminate altruism within groups, or harassment. To test these alternatives, we examined predictors of food-sharing decisions under controlled conditions of mixed relatedness and equal familiarity. Over a 2 year period, we individually fasted 20 vampire bats ( Desmodus rotundus ) and induced food sharing on 48 days. Surprisingly, donors initiated food sharing more often than recipients, which is inconsistent with harassment. Food received was the best predictor of food given across dyads, and 8.5 times more important than relatedness. Sixty-four per cent of sharing dyads were unrelated, approaching the 67 per cent expected if nepotism was absent. Consistent with social bonding, the food-sharing network was consistent and correlated with mutual allogrooming. Together with past work, these findings support the hypothesis that food sharing in vampire bats provides mutual direct fitness benefits, and is not explained solely by kin selection or harassment.

scholarly journals Development of new food-sharing relationships among nonkin vampire bats

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald G. Carter ◽  
Damien R. Farine ◽  
Rachel J. Crisp ◽  
Julia K. Vrtilek ◽  
Simon P. Ripperger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Bonds ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Cooperative Relationships ◽  
Vampire Bats ◽  
Term Pair ◽  
Show Evidence ◽  
Survival And Reproduction ◽  
High Investment

AbstractIn an individualized animal society, social bonds can foster cooperation and enhance survival and reproduction. Cooperative bonds often exist among kin, but nonkin can also develop high-investment cooperative bonds that share similarities with human friendship. How do such bonds form? One theory suggests that strangers should ‘test the waters’ of a new relationship by making small initial cooperative investments and gradually escalating them with good partners. This ‘raising-the-stakes’ strategy is demonstrated by human strangers in short-term economic games, but it remains unclear whether it applies to helping in a natural long-term social bond. Here we show evidence that unfamiliar vampire bats (Desmodus rotundus) selectively escalate low-cost investments in allogrooming before developing higher-cost food-sharing relationships. We introduced females from geographically distant sites in pairs or groups and observed that bats established new reciprocal grooming relationships, and that increasing grooming rates predicted the occurrence of first food donations, at which point grooming rates no longer increased. New food-sharing relationships emerged reciprocally in 14% of female pairs, typically over 10-15 months, and developed faster when strangers lacked alternative familiar partners. A gradual grooming-to-sharing transition among past strangers suggests that ‘raising the stakes’ might be more evident when tracking multiple cooperative behaviours as new relationships form, rather than measuring a single behavior in an established relationship. ‘Raising the stakes’ could play a similar underappreciated role across a broader spectrum of social decisions with long-term consequences, such as joining a new social group or forming a long-term pair-bond.Significance statementVampire bats form long-term cooperative social bonds that involve reciprocal food sharing. How do two unrelated bats go from being strangers to having a high-investment food-sharing relationship? We introduced unfamiliar bats and found evidence that low-cost grooming paves the way for higher-cost food donations. Food sharing emerged in a reciprocal fashion and it emerged faster when two strangers did not have access to their original groupmates. The bats that formed new food-sharing relationships had a history of escalating reciprocal grooming up until the food sharing began. Our finding that unfamiliar nonkin vampire bats appear to gradually and selectively transition from low-cost to high-cost cooperative behaviors is the first evidence that nonhuman individuals ‘raise the stakes’ when forming new cooperative relationships.

scholarly journals Social foraging in vampire bats is predicted by long-term cooperative relationships

PLoS Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. e3001366
Author(s):  
Simon P. Ripperger ◽  
Gerald G. Carter
Keyword(s):  
Social Evolution ◽  
Group Living ◽  
Food Sharing ◽  
Social Foraging ◽  
Social Grooming ◽  
Cooperative Relationships ◽  
Vampire Bats ◽  
In Captivity ◽  
Access To Food

Stable social bonds in group-living animals can provide greater access to food. A striking example is that female vampire bats often regurgitate blood to socially bonded kin and nonkin that failed in their nightly hunt. Food-sharing relationships form via preferred associations and social grooming within roosts. However, it remains unclear whether these cooperative relationships extend beyond the roost. To evaluate if long-term cooperative relationships in vampire bats play a role in foraging, we tested if foraging encounters measured by proximity sensors could be explained by wild roosting proximity, kinship, or rates of co-feeding, social grooming, and food sharing during 21 months in captivity. We assessed evidence for 6 hypothetical scenarios of social foraging, ranging from individual to collective hunting. We found that closely bonded female vampire bats departed their roost separately, but often reunited far outside the roost. Repeating foraging encounters were predicted by within-roost association and histories of cooperation in captivity, even when accounting for kinship. Foraging bats demonstrated both affiliative and competitive interactions with different social calls linked to each interaction type. We suggest that social foraging could have implications for social evolution if “local” within-roost cooperation and “global” outside-roost competition enhances fitness interdependence between frequent roostmates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document