Validation of DIAGNOdent laser fluorescence and the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) in diagnosis of occlusal caries in permanent teeth: an in vivo study

2016 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lia S. Castilho ◽  
Fernanda V. M. D. Cotta ◽  
Audrey C. Bueno ◽  
Allyson N. Moreira ◽  
Efigênia F. Ferreira ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. 774-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Doméjean ◽  
Julie Rongier ◽  
Michèle Muller-Bolla

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this systematic review was to assess the in vivo scientific evidence regarding the ability of a recently developed light fluorescence device, SoproLife® (Sopro-Acteon group, La Ciotat, France) in detecting occlusal carious lesions. The PubMed database was searched for in vivo trials that evaluated the validity of the SoproLife® camera for the detection of occlusal carious lesions. Among the 11 articles originally identified with the keyword “Soprolife,” only three articles were included. The three included surveys used the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS)-II criteria as gold standard for the assessment of SoproLife® compared or not to other detection devices (DIAGNOdent® and Spectra Caries Detection Aid®). Two of the included studies reported only on permanent teeth or both primary and permanent teeth. The SoproLife® validity values varied markedly among studies with a sensitivity ranging between 0.43 and 0.95 and a specificity between 0.55 and 1. Interobserver reproducibility with the SoproLife® was reported in two of the three studies (0.98 and 0.72) and none of the studies reported about intraobserver reproducibility. No clear-cut conclusion can be made based on the three included clinical studies; further in vivo investigations are needed to confirm the validity of the SoproLife® camera in terms of detection of occlusal carious lesions. How to cite this article Doméjean S, Rongier J, Muller-Bolla M. Detection of Occlusal Carious Lesion using the SoproLife® Camera: A Systematic Review. J Contemp Dent Pract 2016;17(9):774-779.


2004 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isauremi Vieira de Assunção Pinheiro ◽  
Maria Cristina dos Santos Medeiros ◽  
Maria Ângela Fernandes Ferreira ◽  
Kenio Costa de Lima

This systematic review was conducted to assess the accuracy of laser fluorescence (DIAGNOdentTM) for diagnosis of occlusal caries in permanent teeth, using any sort of gold standard. The MEDLINE, LILACS, BBO and Cochrane library databases accessed by BIREME were searched for English, Spanish and Portuguese-language papers published between 1982 and 2003. Four works in English were selected. DIAGNOdentTM was found to be an accurate method for diagnosis of occlusal caries, mainly if employed simultaneously with visual inspection.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Baffi Diniz ◽  
Jonas de Almeida Rodrigues ◽  
Andréia Bolzan de Paula ◽  
Rita de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 61
Author(s):  
SreekanthKumar Mallineni ◽  
JayachandraReddy Bhumireddy ◽  
Ramasubbareddy Challa ◽  
Sivakumar Nuvvula

2015 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 523-530 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Jallad ◽  
Domenick Zero ◽  
George Eckert ◽  
Andrea Ferreira Zandona

Background: The paradigm shift towards the nonsurgical management of dental caries relies on the early detection of the disease. Detection of caries at an early stage is of unequivocal importance for early preventive intervention. Objective: The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the performance of a visual examination using the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria, two quantitative light-induced fluorescence (QLF) systems - Inspektor™ Pro and QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 (Inspektor Research Systems B.V., Amsterdam, The Netherlands) - and a photothermal radiometry and modulated luminescence, The Canary System® (Quantum Dental Technologies, Toronto, Ont., Canada) on the detection of primary occlusal caries on permanent teeth. Methods: A total of 60 teeth with occlusal surface sites ranging from sound to noncavitated lesions (ICDAS 0-4) were assessed with each detection method twice in a random order. Histological validation was used to compare methods for sensitivity, specificity, percent correct, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), at standard and optimum sound thresholds. Interexaminer agreement and intraexaminer repeatability were measured using intraclass correlation coefficients. Results: Interexaminer agreement ranged between 0.48 (The Canary System®) and 0.96 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). Intraexaminer repeatability ranges were 0.33-0.63 (The Canary System®) and 0.96-0.99 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). The sensitivity range was 0.75-0.96 while that of specificity was 0.43-0.89. The AUC were 0.79 (The Canary System®), 0.87 (ICDAS), 0.90 (Inspektor™ Pro), and 0.94 (QLF-D Biluminator™ 2). Conclusion: ICDAS had the best combination of sensitivity and specificity followed by QLF-D Biluminator™ 2 at optimum threshold.


2008 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 461-461
Author(s):  
Michele Baffi Diniz ◽  
Jonas de Almeida Rodrigues ◽  
Andréia Bolzan de Paula ◽  
Rita de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro

2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. E189-E196 ◽  
Author(s):  
FVMD Cotta ◽  
LS de Castilho ◽  
AN Moreira ◽  
SM Paiva ◽  
EF Ferreira ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Objective The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical performance and to validate the Lesion Activity Assessment (LAA) in conjunction with the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) for occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent teeth. Methods Patients with erupted or partially erupted third molars were recruited from the surgery clinic of the School of Dentistry of the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil. A calibrated examiner evaluated 49 teeth using the ICDAS-LAA criteria. The histologic criterion proposed by Ekstrand and others was used to validate severity at the thresholds D1 (outer half of the enamel), D2 (inner half of the enamel and outer third of the dentin), and D3 (inner or middle third of the dentin). Lesion activity was validated using 0.1% methyl red solution. Results The method demonstrated good reliability (weighted kappa for severity=0.60; unweighted kappa for activity=0.61). The ICDAS presented a higher performance for lesion detection (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [Az]=0.79) using the threshold D3. At the thresholds D1 and D2, the results for Az were 0.57 and 0.74, respectively. Regarding the ICDAS-LAA, Az = 0.59. Conclusions Clinical protocols can use ICDAS for the severity diagnosis of occlusal caries, but the LAA performance was poor.


2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meryem Toraman Alkurt ◽  
Ilkay Peker ◽  
Hacer Deniz Arisu ◽  
Oya Bala ◽  
Bülent Altunkaynak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document