PROTOCOLS FOR INDUCING HOMEOSTATIC PLASTICITY REFLECTED IN THE CORTICOSPINAL EXCITABILITY IN HEALTHY HUMAN PARTICIPANTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META‐ANALYSIS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priscilla G. Wittkopf ◽  
Dennis B. Larsen ◽  
Thomas Graven‐Nielsen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Homeostatic Plasticity ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Human Participants

Sham transcranial electrical stimulation and its effects on corticospinal excitability: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 223-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thusharika D. Dissanayaka ◽  
Maryam Zoghi ◽  
Michael Farrell ◽  
Gary F. Egan ◽  
Shapour Jaberzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Random Noise ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Placebo Effects ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Transcranial Random Noise Stimulation ◽  
Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation

AbstractSham stimulation is used in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess the efficacy of active stimulation and placebo effects. It should mimic the characteristics of active stimulation to achieve blinding integrity. The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature to identify the effects of sham transcranial electrical stimulation (tES) – including anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS, c-tDCS), transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) and transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) – on corticospinal excitability (CSE), compared to baseline in healthy individuals. Electronic databases – PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Science Direct and MEDLINE (Ovid) – were searched for RCTs of tES from 1990 to March 2017. Thirty RCTs were identified. Using a random-effects model, meta-analysis of a-tDCS, c-tDCS, tACS, tRNS and tPCS studies showed statistically non-significant pre-post effects of sham interventions on CSE. This review found evidence for statically non-significant effects of sham tES on CSE.

Influence of Beverage Temperature on Palatability and Fluid Ingestion During Endurance Exercise: A Systematic Review

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catriona A. Burdon ◽  
Nathan A. Johnson ◽  
Phillip G. Chapman ◽  
Helen T. O’Connor
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Body Weight ◽  
Fluid Intake ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Drinking Behavior ◽  
Hydration Status ◽  
Heat Illness ◽  
Fluid Consumption ◽  
Fluid Ingestion ◽  
Human Participants

Beverage palatability is known to influence fluid consumption during exercise and may positively influence hydration status and help prevent fatigue, heat illness, and decreased performance.Purpose:The aims of this review were to evaluate the effect of beverage temperature on fluid intake during exercise and investigate the influence of beverage temperature on palatability.Methods:Citations from multiple databases were searched from the earliest record to November 2010 using the terms beverage, fluid, or water and palatability, preference, feeding, and drinking behavior and temperature. Included studies (N = 14) needed to use adult (≥18 yr) human participants, have beverage temperatures ≤50 °C, and measure consumption during exercise and/or palatability.Results:All studies reporting palatability (n = 10) indicated that cold (0–10 °C) or cool (10–22 °C) beverages were preferred to warmer ones (control, ≥22 °C). A meta-analysis on studies reporting fluid consumption (n = 5) revealed that participants consumed ~50% (effect size = 1.4, 0.75–2.04, 95% CI) more cold/cool beverages than control during exercise. Subanalysis of studies assessing hydration status (n = 4) with consumption of cool/cold vs. warm beverages demonstrated that dehydration during exercise was reduced by 1.3% of body weight (1.6–0.9%, 95% CI; p < .001).Conclusion:Cool beverage temperatures (<22 °C) significantly increased fluid palatability, fluid consumption, and hydration during exercise vs. control (≥22 °C).

scholarly journals Reproducible and Opposing Microbiome Signatures Distinguish Autoimmune Diseases and Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Md Zohorul Islam ◽  
Melissa Tran ◽  
Tao Xu ◽  
Braden T. Tierney ◽  
Chirag Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
Gut Microbiome ◽  
Sulfur Metabolism ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Underlying Mechanism ◽  
Fold Change ◽  
Analysis Model ◽  
Healthy Human ◽  
Cancer Studies

Abstract Background: The gut microbiome promotes specific immune responses, and in turn the immune system has a hand in shaping the microbiome. Cancer and autoimmune diseases are two major disease families that result from the contrasting manifestations of immune dysfunction. We hypothesized that the opposing immunological profiles between cancer and autoimmunity yield analogously inverted gut microbiome signatures. To test this, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on gut microbiome signatures and their directionality in cancers and autoimmune conditionsMethodology: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBAS to identify relevant articles to be included in this study. The study was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statements and PRISMA 2009 checklist. Study estimates were pooled by a generic inverse variance random-effects meta-analysis model. The relative abundance of microbiome features was converted to log fold-change and the standard error was calculated from the p-values, sample size and fold-change. Results: We screened 3,874 potentially relevant publications. A total of 82 eligible studies comprising 37 autoimmune and 45 cancer studies with 4,208 healthy human controls and 5,957 disease cases from 27 countries were included in this study. We identified a set of microbiome features that show consistent, opposite directionality between cancers and autoimmune diseases in multiple studies. Fusobacterium and Peptostreptococcus were the most consistently increased genera among the cancer cases which were found to be associated in a remarkable 13 (+0.54 log fold-change in 5 studies) and 11 studies (+3.75 log fold-change in 5 studies), respectively. Conversely, Bacteroides was the most prominent genus, which was found to be increased in 12 autoimmune studies (+0.24 log fold-change in 6 studies) and decreased in six cancer studies (-0.32 log fold-change in 4 studies). Sulfur-metabolism pathways were found to be the most frequent pathways among the member of cancer-increased genus and species.Conclusions: The surprising reproducibility of these associations across studies and geographies suggests a shared underlying mechanism shaping the microbiome across cancers and autoimmune diseases.

scholarly journals Changes in Spinal and Corticospinal Excitability in Patients with Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1037 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung-Min Kim ◽  
Joo-Sung Kim ◽  
David Cruz-Díaz ◽  
Seungho Ryu ◽  
Minsoo Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Ankle Instability ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chronic Ankle Instability ◽  
H Reflex ◽  
Corticospinal Excitability ◽  
Spinal Reflex ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Neural Excitability ◽  
Ankle Muscles

The objective of this systematic review with meta-analysis was to determine alterations in spinal and corticospinal excitability of ankle muscles in patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI) compared to uninjured controls. Independent researchers performed comprehensive literature searches of electronic databases and included studies that compared groups with and without CAI and investigated neural excitability with Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and/or transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS). A fixed-effect meta-analysis was conducted to determine group differences for (1) soleus and fibularis maximal H-reflex (Hmax)/maximal M-wave (Mmax)-ratios, and (2) soleus and fibularis longus cortical motor thresholds (CMTs). Seventeen studies were included in the current meta-analysis. They showed that the Hmax/Mmax-ratios of the soleus and the fibularis longus in the CAI group were significantly lower than those in the uninjured control group (soleus: d = −0.41, p < 0.001; fibularis longus: d = −0.27, p = 0.04). There was no evidence for changes in the CMT. This systematic review is the first to demonstrate evidence that patients with CAI present decreased spinal reflex excitability in the soleus and fibularis longus. However, there is no evidence of changes in supraspinal excitability when considering only the CMT. The latter result needs to be interpreted with caution as all except one study demonstrate some changes at the supraspinal level with CAI.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document