Lateral reticular nucleus modulates the cardiosomatic reflex evoked by intrapericardial capsaicin in the rat

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 1511-1518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Man Han ◽  
Xiao-Hua Liu ◽  
Na Sun ◽  
Jian-Qing Du ◽  
Juan-Xia Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Reticular Nucleus

The effect of the lateral reticular nucleus of the medulla oblongata on the cerebellar cortex

1971 ◽  
Vol 2 (6) ◽  
pp. 439-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yu. I. Arshavskii ◽  
M. B. Berkinblit ◽  
I. M. Gel'fand ◽  
O. I. Fukson
Keyword(s):  
Cerebellar Cortex ◽  
Medulla Oblongata ◽  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Reticular Nucleus

Cutaneous afferent responses in neurones of the lateral reticular nucleus

1972 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingmar Rose´n ◽  
Peter Scheid
Keyword(s):  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Reticular Nucleus

Caudolateral areas of medulla-mediating release of ACTH in cats

1986 ◽  
Vol 251 (5) ◽  
pp. R934-R940
Author(s):  
D. A. Bereiter ◽  
D. S. Gann
Keyword(s):  
Brain Stem ◽  
Stimulus Pattern ◽  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Plasma Acth ◽  
Acth Stimulation ◽  
Afferent Information ◽  
Burst Pattern ◽  
Stimulation Of ◽  
Acth Release

The effect of electrical stimulation of the caudolateral brain stem on plasma adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) was assessed in cats anesthetized with alpha-chloralose-urethan. To examine the influence of stimulus pattern on ACTH release, an equal number of pulses was presented in a continuous pattern and in a burst pattern at each electrode site. Stimulation of the magnocellular portion (layers 4-6) of trigeminal nucleus caudalis evoked a significant (P less than 0.01) and equal peak change in plasma ACTH after continuous pattern (+121 +/- 32 pg/ml) and after burst pattern stimuli (+126 +/- 30 pg/ml, n = 21). In contrast, stimulation of more ventromedial portions (layers 7-8) of nucleus caudalis had no significant effect on plasma ACTH. Stimulation of the trigeminal lateral cervical region the caudal extent of the A1 noradrenergic cell group, or the lateral reticular nucleus evoked significant peak increases in plasma ACTH regardless of stimulus pattern. Transient changes in arterial pressure accompanied brain stem stimulation and were not correlated with the changes in ACTH. The results indicate that stimulation of trigeminal subnucleus caudalis, a brain stem region that processes nociceptor afferent information, evokes a prompt increase in plasma ACTH. Stimulation of brain stem regions that process autonomic and cardiovascular afferent information (A1 region, lateral reticular nucleus) also facilitate ACTH release. No significant influence of stimulus pattern on brain stem-evoked ACTH release was seen. The results support the hypothesis that the influence of the central nervous system on ACTH release may be processed by parallel pathways at the caudal brain stem level.

Quantitative characterization and spinal pathway mediating inhibition of spinal nociceptive transmission from the lateral reticular nucleus in the rat

1988 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 226-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Janss ◽  
G. F. Gebhart
Keyword(s):  
Electrical Stimulation ◽  
Spontaneous Activity ◽  
Pulse Duration ◽  
Neuronal Response ◽  
Response Threshold ◽  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Descending Inhibition ◽  
Nociceptive Transmission ◽  
Spinal Pathway

1. The modulation of spinal nociceptive transmission from the lateral reticular nucleus (LRN) was characterized for 47 spinal dorsal horn neurons in pentobarbital-anesthetized, paralyzed rats. All 47 units studied had receptive fields confined to the glabrous skin of the plantar surface of the ipsilateral hind foot and responded to mechanical stimulation as well as noxious heating (50 degrees C). Rostral projections contained in the ventrolateral quadrant of the cervical spinal cord were demonstrated for 15 of the 47 units by antidromic invasion. Glutamate- and stimulation-produced descending inhibition, the spinal pathway, and tonic descending inhibition from the LRN were systematically examined. 2. Inhibition of unit responses to heating of the skin by electrical stimulation in the LRN varied with the intensity, pulse duration (100 or 400 microseconds), and frequency (25–100 Hz) of stimulation. Greater inhibition was produced at lower intensities of stimulation with the 400-microseconds pulse duration and a frequency of 100 Hz. The effects of stimulation on spontaneous activity and responses to heat were compared in 16 experiments; inhibition of spontaneous activity was intensity dependent and did not differ significantly in magnitude from stimulation-produced inhibition of responses to heating of the skin. 3. Tracking experiments established that stimulation in the ipsilateral and contralateral ventrolateral medulla reliably attenuated unit responses to noxious heating of the skin and that stimulation in the LRN produced maximal inhibition at a low intensity of stimulation. Descending inhibition was quantitatively characterized from sites within (n = 32) and outside (n = 30) the LRN. Both the extrapolated mean stimulation threshold for inhibition and mean intensity inhibiting unit responses to heat to 50% of control were significantly lower for sites in the LRN. 4. The responses of seven spinal units to graded noxious heating of the skin were studied; all exhibited linear monotonic stimulus-response functions (SRFs) throughout the temperature range examined (42–50 degrees C). Electrical stimulation in the LRN significantly decreased the slope (42 +/- 4% of control) of the SRFs and increased the neuronal response threshold (2.0 +/- 0.7 degrees C). 5. S-glutamate (50 nmol, 0.5 microliter) was microinjected into stimulation sites within (n = 15) and distant from (n = 6) the LRN. Glutamate produced a transient (less than 7 min) but significant attenuation of neuronal responses to heat to 35 +/- 6% of control only when microinjected into the LRN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Renal and somatic input to spinal neurons antidromically activated from the ventrolateral medulla

1988 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 1967-1981 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. S. Ammons
Keyword(s):  
Reticular Formation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Ventrolateral Medulla ◽  
Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Lateral Reticular Nucleus ◽  
Spinal Neurons ◽  
C Fiber ◽  
Somatic Input ◽  
Fiber Stimulation ◽  
Stimulation Of

1. Studies were done to characterize responses of spinal neurons backfired from the ventrolateral medulla to renal and somatic stimuli. Experiments were performed on 31 cats that were anesthetized with alpha-chloralose. Sixty-six spinal neurons were antidromically activated from the area of the lateral reticular nucleus or the ventrolateral reticular formation just rostral to the lateral reticular nucleus contralateral to the recording site. These cells could not be backfired from the medial reticular formation or from the spinothalamic tract just caudal to the thalamus. 2. Cells were located in laminae I, V, and VII of the T12-L2 segments. Antidromic conduction velocities averaged 35.9 +/- 7.2 m/s. Conduction velocities were unrelated to the projection site or laminar location of the cells. Termination sites of 21 cells were located in antidromic mapping experiments. Terminals were localized to the ventrolateral reticular formation, including the lateral reticular nucleus. 3. Responses to electrical stimulation of the renal nerves were always excitatory. Stimulation of renal A-delta-fibers excited 33 cells. These cells failed to respond to stimulation of renal C-fibers. The other 33 cells responded to both A-delta- and C-fiber stimulation. Latencies to A-delta-fiber stimulation averaged 9 +/- 2 ms, whereas latencies to C-fiber stimulation averaged 57 +/- 10 ms. 4. Renal mechanoreceptors were activated by occlusion of the renal vein or upper portion of the ureter. Renal vein occlusion excited 14 of 32 cells tested. Activity increased from 6 +/- 2 to 14 +/- 4 spike/s. Ureteral occlusion increased activity of 19 of 32 cells from 7 +/- 2 to 16 +/- 5 spikes/s. Cells responding to one of the mechanical stimuli were significantly more likely to receive A-delta-and C-fiber input compared with nonresponding cells. Nonresponders were more likely than responders to receive only A-delta input. 5. All cells received somatic input in addition to renal input. Twelve cells were classified as wide dynamic range, 46 as high threshold, and 8 as Deep. Somatic receptive fields most often included skin and muscle of the left flank and abdomen. Thirty-two cells had bilateral receptive fields, and 22 had inhibitory fields in addition to excitatory fields. 6. These data show that spinal neurons projecting to the ventrolateral medulla receive convergent inputs from the kidney and somatic structures. These cells may participate in a variety of functions including autonomic reflexes of renal origin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document