Fine‐needle aspiration cytology and core‐needle biopsy in the diagnosis of lymphadenopathies: words of endorsement

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mousa Al‐Abbadi ◽  
Helena Barroca ◽  
Beata Bode‐Lesniewska ◽  
Maria Calaminici ◽  
David C Chhieng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

scholarly journals The role of core needle biopsies in the management of neck lumps

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-196
Author(s):  
A Kalra ◽  
G-M Prucher ◽  
S Hodges
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

Introduction King’s College Hospital has proudly provided a one-stop neck lump clinic since 2012. These multidisciplinary clinics allow for rapid diagnoses due to in-clinic investigations. In April 2013, ultrasound-guided core needle biopsies were introduced as an alternative/adjunct to fine-needle aspiration cytology and open biopsies for obtaining histological diagnoses. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of core needle biopsies on the diagnosis of neck lumps compared with fine-needle aspiration cytology and open biopsies between April 2015 and May 2016. Materials and methods Data were collected prospectively between April 2015 and May 2016 and analysed for numbers of fine-needle aspiration cytology, core needle biopsies and open biopsies performed and diagnoses made. Results A total of 190 patients were seen on the clinic; 51 had fine-needle aspiration cytology and 19 procedures gave a diagnosis. Of the remainder of these patients, 21 went on to have a core needle biopsy and 12 biopsies gave a diagnosis. An additional eight patients only had a core needle biopsy, of which five biopsies gave a diagnosis. Of the ten patients who had an open biopsy, four had a previous fine-needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy, three only a core needle biopsy, two had neither and one had fine-needle aspiration cytology. Conclusion The introduction of core needle biopsies has reduced the number of open biopsies performed. With increasing acceptance of this minimally invasive technique, core needle biopsies appear to be forming the key diagnostic investigation in patients with neck lumps.

Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of parotid gland swellings

2008 ◽  
Vol 123 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-452 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Pratap ◽  
A Qayyum ◽  
N Ahmed ◽  
P Jani ◽  
L H Berman
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

AbstractObjective:To determine whether ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy is a safe and reliable investigation in cases of parotid swelling in which fine needle aspiration cytology has failed to give a definitive diagnosis.Design:Analysis of 66 ultrasound-guided core biopsy specimens of the parotid gland (the largest series reported thus far) sample number refers to histological samples throughout the paper.Subjects:All the 184 cases of parotid surgery with a histological diagnosis were included.Main outcome measures:The sensitivity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology and ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy, as compared with the final histological analysis.Results:Of a total of 184 patients, 89.1 per cent (164/184) had benign parotid lesions excised. The sensitivity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology for benign lesions were 76.2, 84.2 and 87.5 per cent, respectively, and those of ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy were 91.7, 98.2 and 96.4 per cent, respectively. Twenty of 184 patients (10.9 per cent) had malignant lesions. The sensitivity, positive predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology for detection of malignant lesions were 60, 75 and 75 per cent, respectively, while those of ultrasound-guided core biopsy were 89, 100 and 100 per cent, respectively. Non-diagnostic rates were 25.8 per cent for fine needle aspiration cytology and 4.5 per cent for ultrasound-guided core biopsy. Only one case of complications (a sub-clinical haematoma) occurred in the ultrasound-guided core biopsy group.Conclusion:We propose ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy as a very safe and effective tool in cases of parotid swelling in which fine needle aspiration cytology has failed to give a definitive diagnosis.

scholarly journals Comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy findings with excisional biopsy in breast malignancy

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 1564-1570
Author(s):  
Uma Bhatta ◽  
Shovana Karki ◽  
Gita Sayami ◽  
Dosti Regmi
Keyword(s):  
Fine Needle Aspiration ◽  
Core Needle Biopsy ◽  
Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Needle Biopsy ◽  
Excisional Biopsy ◽  
Needle Aspiration ◽  
Aspiration Cytology ◽  
Core Needle ◽  
Fine Needle ◽  
Needle Aspiration Cytology

Background: Fine needle aspiration cytology and core needle biopsy are reliable procedures for breast cancer detection. Core needle biopsy is an established alternative to surgical biopsy for diagnosis and prognostication. However, there may be a concern that core needle biopsy may be less reliable than excisional biopsy. The aim of this study was to compare the cytological/core needle biopsy finding with excisional histopathological diagnosis and determine their hormonal status. Materials and Methods: A prospective study of 65 patients was conducted after obtaining a detailed clinical data. The comparison of the fine needle aspiration cytology/core needle biopsy finding with excisional histopathological diagnosis of breast malignancy was carried out after data analysis. Their ER, PR and HER-2/neu status was also studied in available cases. Results: Out of the 65 cases of breast malignancy, 69.2% of cases had undergone fine needle aspiration, 60% cases core needle biopsy and 93.8% cases excisional biopsy. The most common carcinoma was invasive carcinoma of no special type. The diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration and core needle biopsy was almost equal, however, core needle biopsy could assess the histological typing and biomarker status. The hormonal status was assessed in 69.23% cases, among them 35.6% cases were triple negative carcinomas. Conclusions: Core needle biopsy was superior to fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of breast lesions in terms of diagnostic accuracy. Thus, our result provides valuable prognostic information to guide the decision-making process for the treatment of a patient with invasive carcinoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document