The urine light chain/glomerular filtration rate (GFR) quotient shows a high sensitivity and specificity to detect cast nephropathy in monoclonal light chain disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raoul Bergner ◽  
Martin Hoffmann ◽  
Michael Uppenkamp ◽  
Peter Paschka ◽  
David Klank
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Light Chain ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Cast Nephropathy ◽  
Light Chain Disease

scholarly journals Serum Cystatin C as a Potential Marker for Glomerular Filtration Rate in Patients with Cholangiocarcinoma

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mang Ngaih Ciin ◽  
Tanakorn Proungvitaya ◽  
Tanakorn Proungvitaya ◽  
Temduang Limpaiboon ◽  
Sittiruk Roytrakul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Cystatin C ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Fundamental Aspect ◽  
Serum Cystatin C ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Serum Cystatin ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is the second most common primary hepatobiliary cancer. These patients have meager prognosis and short-term survival. Precise assessment of glomerular filtration rate is a fundamental aspect of clinical care in cancer patients. Cystatin C has been proposed to be superior to creatinine, a well-known marker of renal function. This study aimed to evaluate cystatin C as a marker of GFR calculation in CCA patients. Materials and Methods: One hundred thirty serum samples from CCA patients and 32 from controls were included in this study. Serum cystatin C was measured using immunoturbidity assay. Estimated glomerular filtration rate was calculated by three equations established by chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration (based on creatinine and/or cystatin C). Results: Serum cystatin C in CCA patients was higher than that of controls (p=0.0002). Cystatin C was positively correlated with BUN in CCA group (p=0.019). eGFR based on cystatin C and based on both cystatin C and creatinine in CCA was low with significantly different from those of control (p<0.001). Although there was no difference in eGFR using three equations in control, creatinine based eGFR was high with significantly different from eGFR based on cystatin C and on both creatinine and cystatin C in CCA (P=0.000). Proportion in each eGFR stage by three equations showed a high sensitivity with significantly different in CCA (p<0.05). Conclusion: There was a high sensitivity of cys C with significant difference between creatinine and/or cystatin C based eGFR in CCA patients. It should be taken into consideration of mild changes in eGFR by cystatin C which is important in managing drug dosage for CCA patients.

Performance of the CKD-EPI and MDRD equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate: a systematic review of Latin American studies

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Brañez-Condorena ◽  
Sergio Goicochea-Lugo ◽  
Jessica Hanae Zafra-Tanaka ◽  
Naysha Becerra-Chauca ◽  
Virgilio E Failoc-Rojas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry ◽  
Grade Methodology ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
Latin American Countries

Abstract BackgroundMost commonly used equations to estimate the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are the CKD-Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD). However, it is not clear which one shows a better performance in Latin America. Objective To assess the performance of both estimated GFR (eGFR) equations in Latin American countries. Methods In January 2019, we performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and “Biblioteca Regional de Medicina” (BIREME) to identify studies that reported eGFR using CKD-EPI and MDRD equations and compared them with a measured GFR (mGFR) using exogenous filtration markers, among adults from Latin American countries. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias evaluation were performed by two reviewers independently. We performed meta-analyses of P30, bias (using mean difference [MD] and its 95% confidence intervals [95% CI]), sensitivity, and specificity; and evaluated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Results We included 12 papers, six of them were meta-analyzed (5 from Brazil and 1 from Mexico). Meta-analyses that compared CKD-EPI using creatinine measured with calibration traceable to isotope dilution mass spectrometry (CKD-EPI-Cr IDMS) and MDRD-4 IDMS did not show statistically significant differences in bias (5 studies, MD: 0.55 mL/min/1.73m 2 , 95% CI: -3.34 to 4.44), P30 (2 studies, MD: 4%, 95% CI: -4% to 13%), sensitivity (2 studies, 76% and 75%), and specificity (2 studies, 91% and 89%), with very low certainty of evidence for bias and P30, and low certainty of evidence for sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions We found that the performance of CKD-EPI-Cr IDMS and MDRD-4 IDMS do not differ significantly, although CKD-EPI-Cr IDMS tends to have a non-significant better performance in terms of P30. However, since most of the meta-analyzed studies were from Brazil, results may not be extrapolated to other Latin American countries. Trial registration CRD42019123434, PROSPERO. Registered 18 February 2019.

scholarly journals Cystatin C: An Improved Estimator of Glomerular Filtration Rate?

2002 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-707 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar F Laterza ◽  
Christopher P Price ◽  
Mitchell G Scott
Keyword(s):  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Cystatin C ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Reference Interval ◽  
Interval Data ◽  
Serum Markers ◽  
Reference Intervals ◽  
Specific Patient

Abstract Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is routinely assessed by measuring the concentrations of endogenous serum markers such as blood urea nitrogen and serum creatinine (SCr). Although widely used, these endogenous markers are not ideal and do not perform optimally in certain clinical settings. The purpose of this review is to critically review the potential utility of cystatin C (CysC), especially in patient populations in which CysC may have an advantage over routinely used endogenous markers of GFR. Approach: In a narrative approach, we extensively review publications, primarily from the last 5 years, that address the development of methods to measure CysC, reference intervals, and the diagnostic accuracy of CysC to assess GFR. Between June 2000 and September 2001 Medline was searched using “cystatin c” as a textword, and articles that examined &gt;75 individuals (except for renal transplant studies) and/or used accepted “gold standards” for assessing GFR were selected for inclusion. A total of 17 studies are reviewed that provide reference interval data for several populations. A total of 24 studies make conclusions about the utility of CysC vs SCr and/or creatinine clearance, with 20 providing data on the sensitivity and specificity of CysC for detecting impaired GFR. These publications are organized into subgroups that deal with specific patient populations or clinical situations. Content: This review focuses on two areas: (a) the evolution of immunoassays used to determine the concentration of CysC in serum, their analytic sensitivity, and reference intervals; and (b) the diagnostic performance of CysC against other renal markers in the general population and in specific subpopulations of patients. Summary: Studies of reference intervals for CysC overwhelmingly demonstrated that CysC values in blood are independent of age and sex. Of the 24 studies that examined clinical utility, 15 concluded that CysC is superior to SCr, whereas 9 concluded that CysC is equivalent but provides no advantage. Summary ROC plot analysis of 20 studies that provide sensitivity and specificity data strongly suggests that CysC will be superior to SCr for detecting impaired GFR. Taken together, it is clear that CysC performs at least as well as SCr in the population at large and that it is likely to be superior to SCr in specific patient populations.

Clinical Renal Function Testing by External Double Isotope Monitoring Technique

1971 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 16-24
Author(s):  
J. Fog Pedersen ◽  
M. Fog Pedersen ◽  
Paul Madsen
Keyword(s):  
Renal Function ◽  
Glomerular Filtration Rate ◽  
Glomerular Filtration ◽  
Plasma Flow ◽  
Filtration Rate ◽  
Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Feedback System ◽  
Effective Renal Plasma Flow ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages

SummaryAn accurate catheter-free technique for clinical determination simultaneouslyof glomerular filtration rate and effective renal plasma flow by means of radioisotopes has been developed. The renal function is estimated by the amount of radioisotopes necessary to maintain a constant concentration in the patient’s blood. The infusion pumps are steered by a feedback system, the pumps being automatically turned on when the radiation measured over the patient’s head falls below a certain preset level and turned off when this level is again readied. 131I-iodopyracet was used for the estimation of effective renal plasma flow and125I-iothalamate estimation of the glomerular filtration rate. These clearances were compared to the conventional bladder clearances and good correlation was found between these two clearance methods (correlation coefficients 0.97 and.90 respectively). The advantages and disadvantages of this new clearance technique are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document