scholarly journals Impact of performance status on overall survival in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: Real‐life outcomes of daratumumab treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 196-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garbriel Afram ◽  
Charlotte Gran ◽  
Johanna Borg Bruchfeld ◽  
Arnika Kathleen Wagner ◽  
Alamdar Hussain ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Life Outcomes ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

scholarly journals Carfilzomib-Dexamethasone Versus Bortezomib-Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Updated Overall Survival, Safety, and Subgroups

2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 522-530.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Z. Orlowski ◽  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Ruben Niesvizky ◽  
Heinz Ludwig ◽  
Albert Oriol ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

scholarly journals Overall survival with oral selinexor plus low‐dose dexamethasone versus real‐world therapy in triple‐class‐refractory multiple myeloma

eJHaem ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Ajai Chari ◽  
Dan T. Vogl ◽  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Real World ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Non-Myeloablative Allogeneic Transplantation in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2759-2759
Author(s):  
Sabine Gerull ◽  
Ute Hegenbart ◽  
Martin Goerner ◽  
Axel Benner ◽  
Thomas Moehler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Chronic Gvhd ◽  
Autologous Transplantation ◽  
Conditioning Regimen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Allogeneic Transplantation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Patients with recurrent and refractory multiple myeloma have a very limited survival expectance. Allogeneic transplantation might offer an option for cure in myeloma and the recent development of non-myeloablative conditioning regimens has reduced transplant related morbidity and mortality and rendered this treatment feasible in elderly patients. The role of non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation for multiple myeloma however, has not yet been defined. We have analyzed the results of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma treated at our institution. Between 08/1999 and 02/2004, 56 patients with relapsed (n=54) or refractory (n=2) myeloma were treated with non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation. The median beta2microglobulin at the time of diagnosis was 2.75 mg/l, and median age at the time of transplant was 54.5 years (39.2–67.8). The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 3.6 years. Prior to allogeneic transplantation, patients received reinduction chemotherapy which included an autologous transplantation for 30 patients. The median number of previous cycles of conventional chemotherapy was 9. The conditioning regimen was 2 Gy TBI with (n=43) or without (n=3) fludarabin 3 x 30 mg/m² for 46 patients, the remaining 10 patients received a melphalan containing regimen. Acute toxicity was low with a WBC < 500/μl and platelets < 50/μl for a median of 0 days. Engraftment was prompt with 90 % of patients having achieved > 90 % donor chimerism by day 56. Acute GvHD Grade II-IV occurred in 36 % of patients with 22 % Grade III-IV, and 61 % experienced chronic GvHD. Total transplant related mortality reached 20 %, with a day 100 TRM of 5 %. 32 patients experienced relapse or progressive disease, and 32 % of patients died due to relapse. The Kaplan-Meier estimate of overall survival and progression free survival at 18 months was 40 % and 25 %, respectively, with a median follow up of survivors of 21 months. Patients who experienced cGvHD had a significantly higher overall survival estimate (60 % vs. 20 % at 18 months, p=0.03). The number of cycles of pretreatment before allogeneic transplantation had a statistically significant negative influence on overall (p=0.02) and progression free survival (p=0.006). We conclude that non-myeloablative allogeneic transplantation is feasible in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. The significant poor prognostic factors we identified were absence of chronic GvHD and number of cycles of pretreatment. Allogeneic transplantion should therefore be considered as an option earlier in the course of the disease.

Safety and Efficacy of Bortezomib (VELCADE™) in 104 Patients with Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Who Have Received at Least Two Previous Lines of Therapy: Impact of Cytogenetics on Response from a Canadian Cohort.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 5118-5118
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Mikhael ◽  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Andrew Belch ◽  
Nizar J. Bahlis ◽  
Deepa Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Partial Response ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Karnofsky Performance Status ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
M Protein ◽  
Cytogenetic Abnormalities ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background: Bortezomib (VELCADE™) is a reversible proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to be safe and efficacious in patients (pts) with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM) using a dose of 1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 & 11 of a 21-day cycle. Certain cytogenetic abnormalities are associated with poor prognosis in MM, including deletion 13, t(4;14) and the p53 deletion.(Stewart et al, JCO2005; 23(26):6339–44). Bortezomib has demonstrated the ability to overcome the poor prognosis associated with deletion 13 (Jagannath, JCO2005; 23(16S) 6501). The impact of bortezomib on a broader range of cytogenetic abnormalities, such as t(4;14) has yet to be determined. Methods: In this multicentre, open-label, non-randomized, phase 3b study, pts with MM across 13 centres in Canada, who had received at least 2 previous lines of therapy and who were refractory to or had relapsed after their last therapy were enrolled. Pts received up to eight 3-week cycles of bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8 & 11. Dexamethasone 20 mg PO was administered on each day of and day after bortezomib administration if the pts either experienced progressive disease after receiving at least 2 treatment cycles of bortezomib or had no change in disease status from baseline after receiving at least 4 treatment cycles of bortezomib. Results: 104 pts were enrolled; the mean age in this cohort was 60.7 years, and 65 (62.5%) were male. Approximately 30% of pts had a Karnofsky performance status of 70 or less at baseline. 71 pts (68.3%) had received prior thalidomide therapy, 32 (30.8%) had received a prior autotransplant and 4 (3.8%) had received prior bortezomib treatment. 74 (71.2%) received 3 or more lines of prior MM therapy. During the study, mean number of bortezomib cycles completed was 4.6 (range, 0–11 cycles), and the number of pts that completed 8 cycles of therapy was 36 (34.6%). 15.2% of pts received dexamethasone at cycle 3 and 19.2% at cycle 5. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on approximately half of the pts. Response data for cycle 5 is currently available for 69/99 (69.7%) of evaluable pts (see Table 1). Overall, 76.9% of the pts experienced Grade 3 & 4 adverse events. Safety profile observed is similar to past trial results with bortezomib. Conclusion: In this large Canadian cohort of extensively pre-treated patients with mulitple myeloma, bortezomib demonstrated good response, consistent with previous studies. Analysis correlating cytogenetic profile and response rate is ongoing and will be available at the time of conference. In addition, a detailed safety analysis and impact of prior treatment on response will be analyzed and made available at the time of conference. Table 1. Response to Bortezomib Category of Response* No. of Patients (%) *Modified SWOG: CR 100% M-protein reduction; R 75–99%; PR 50–74%; MR 25–49%; SD<25%, PD increasing M-protein Any Response (CR + VGPR + PR + MR) 47 (68.1) ---Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) ---22 (31.9) ---Partial Response (PR) + Minimal Response (MR) ---25 (36.2) Stable Disease 10 (14.5) Progressive Disease 12 (17.4)

scholarly journals Refractory IgD Multiple Myeloma Treated with Daratumumab: A Case Report and Literature Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Husnain ◽  
Sandra Kurtin ◽  
Nikki Barkett ◽  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Amit Agarwal
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Median Overall Survival ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Human Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Proteasome Inhibitors ◽  
Recent Analysis ◽  
Immunomodulatory Drugs ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma have poor prognosis. A recent analysis of patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma who were refractory to both proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs showed the median overall survival of 9 months only. Daratumumab is the first-in-class human monoclonal antibody against CD38 cells which was studied in phase I/II trials for treatment of these patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. It showed an overall response rate of 36% and a median overall survival (OS) of 17 months in these patients. We report a case of 40-year-old man with immunoglobulin D (IgD) multiple myeloma whose disease was refractory to at least 5 different chemotherapy regimens including proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs. The clinical studies assessing daratumumab did not include any patients with IgD myeloma which is a rare form of multiple myeloma and to our knowledge is the first study reporting use of daratumumab in IgD myeloma.

scholarly journals Comparison of the Freiburg and Charlson Comorbidity Indices in Predicting Overall Survival in Elderly Patients with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sung Min Kim ◽  
Moon Jin Kim ◽  
Hyun Ae Jung ◽  
Kihyun Kim ◽  
Seok Jin Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Solid Cancer ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
History Of ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
And Performance ◽  
The Impact

Multiple myeloma occurs primarily in elderly patients. Considering the high prevalence of comorbidities, comorbidity is an important issue for the management of myeloma. However, the impact of comorbidity on clinical outcomes has not been fully investigated. We retrospectively analyzed patients with newly diagnosed myeloma. Comorbidities were assessed based on the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the Freiburg comorbidity index (FCI). The CCI is a summary measure of 19 comorbid conditions. FCI is determined by performance status, renal impairment, and lung disease. This study included 127 patients with a median age of 71 years. Approximately half of the patients had additional disorders at the time of diagnosis, and diabetes mellitus was the most frequent diagnosis (18.9%). The most significant factors for prognosis among patient-related conditions were a history of solid cancer and performance status (ECOG ≥ 2). The FCI score was divided into 3 groups (0, 1, and 2-3), and the CCI score was divided into 2 groups (2-3 and ≥4). FCI was a strong prognostic tool for OS (P>0.001) and predicted clinical outcome better than CCI (P=0.059). In conclusion, FCI was more useful than CCI in predicting overall survival in elderly patients with myeloma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document