Outcome after high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

2018 ◽  
Vol 101 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-20
Author(s):  
Katharina Kriegsmann ◽  
Michael Rieger ◽  
Mark-Alexander Schwarzbich ◽  
Sören Sitter ◽  
Mark Kriegsmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Busulfan, Melphalan and Etoposide Followed by Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation on Patients with Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Multicenter Study From Consortium for Improving Survival of Lymphoma (CISL) in Korea

Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 2021-2021
Author(s):  
Kyoung Ha Kim ◽  
Won Seog Kim ◽  
Sung-Kyu Park ◽  
Mark Hong Lee ◽  
Sang Kyun Sohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Abstract Abstract 2021 Background: High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has become the standard approach for relapsed or high risk non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Several different high dose therapy (HDT) conditioning regimens have been used for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), such as BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, melphalan), BEAC (carmustine, etoposide, cytosine arabinoside, cyclophosphamide), and CBV (cyclophosphamide, carmustine, etoposide). Carmustine is an active drug in the HDT of NHL but the supply of carmustine is limited in some countries including Korea. Intravenous busulfan containing regimens as conditioining regimen have been used for both allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with hematologic and non –hematologic malignancies. The purpose of this prospective multicenter phase II study was evaluate the efficacy and safety of iv busulfan/melphalan/etoposide regimen as a conditioining regimen for high dose chemotherapy in the patients with relapsed or high risk NHL. Methods: Patients with relapsed or primary refractory NHL or chemosensitive high risk NHL underwent high dose chemotherapy followed by ASCT at 13 centers in Korea. The conditioning regimen consisted of iv busulfan 3.2mg/kg/day i.v. on days −8, −7 and −6, etoposide 400mg/m2/day i.v. on days −5 and −4 and melphalan 50mg/m2/day i.v. on days −3 and −2. Results: Fifty one patients were enrolled onto the study. Main subgroups were DLBCL (n=25, 49%) and T cell lymphoma (n=19, 37%). At the time of ASCT, the disease status of patients was as follows: 13 patients were high risk in remission, 16 were primarily refractory to inducton therapy, 15 patients were in chemosensitive relapse. All patients had successful stem cell engraftment with a median time to neutrophil recovery of more than 500/mm3 of 10 days (range, 2 to 30 days). Platelet recovery of more than 20,000/mm3 was seen after a median of 10 days (range, 2 to 51 days) with delayed recovery in one patient. Treatment related toxicities included nausea/vomiting in 28 patients (55%), diarrhea in 28 patients (55%) and mucositis in 33 patients (65%), which were grade I or II in the majority of cases. Grade I/II hepatic toxicities occurred in 24% (n=12) and grade III in 6% (n=3). There were no VOD and treatment related death. The median duration of hospitalization for ASCT was 30 days (range, 12 to 80 days). Forty one patients (80%) achieved a complete response 1 month after ASCT, while three patients showed progressive disease. At a median follow up of 14.7 months, 21(41%) patients exhibited a relapse or progression, while 11 patients had died of disease and one patient had died of heart failure. The estimated 2-year overall and progression free survival for all patients was 64% and 40%, respectively. Conclusion: This preliminary analysis suggests that conditioning regimen of i.v. busulfan/melphalan/etoposide would be well tolerated and effective in patients with relapsed or high risk NHL. Accordingly, this regimen may be regarded as an important treatment option to substitute for BEAM regimen. Disclosures: Lee: Novartis: Research Funding.

BEAM or BuCyE high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7097-7097
Author(s):  
J. Kim ◽  
E. Kim ◽  
B. Sohn ◽  
D. Yoon ◽  
C. Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

7097 Background: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of two high-dose regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL): BEAM (BCNU, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) and BuCyE (busulfan, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide). Methods: We analysed 65 NHL patients, who underwent high-dose chemotherapy with BEAM (N=43) or BuCyE (N=22), followed by ASCT, at the Asan Medical Center. BEAM was used from February 2002 to October 2005, and BuCyE was used from November 2005 to April 2008. Results: Median age was 46 years (range: 15–68), and baseline characteristics, such as gender, International Prognostic Index (IPI), age adjusted IPI, stage and status of disease at ASCT, and median number of infused CD 34+cells/kg were well balanced between groups. The incidence of mucositis, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea and bleeding, and the number of events clinically important infections during ASCT did not differ between groups. Median follow-up for survivors was 49.3 months in the BEAM group and 21.5 months in the BuCyE group. Median overall survival (OS) was 30.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.19–53.0 months) and 22.6 months (95% CI, 12.1–33.1 months) and median event-free survival (EFS) was 16.1 months (95% CI, 0.0–53.6 months) and 11.2 months (95% CI, 0.0–22.5 months) in the BEAM and BuCyE group, respectively. There were no significant differences in OS (p=0.636) and EFS (p=0.575) between the two groups. Conclusions: In our analysis, BuCyE appeared to be not inferior to BEAM for survival. And we found that regimen-related toxicities did not differ significantly between the two groups. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Long-Term Outcome after LACE (Lomustine, Ara-C, Cyclophosphamide, Etoposide) Conditioned Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Relapsed or Refractory Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: A Single Centre Experience.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5502-5502
Author(s):  
Jolanta B. Perz ◽  
Chrissy M. Giles ◽  
Donald MacDonald ◽  
Jane F. Apperley ◽  
Edward J. Kanfer
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Secondary Malignancy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Long Term Outcome

Abstract Introduction: The majority of patients with Hodgkin’s lymphoma are cured with initial therapy. However, in patients with primary refractory or relapsed disease, high-dose therapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation has been shown to be the best option. We analysed patients (pts) who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) following LACE (Lomustine 200 mg/m2, Ara-C 4 g/m2, Cyclophosphamide 4.8 g/m2, Etoposide 1 g/m2) conditioning for relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma at the Hammersmith Hospital, London, between 1991 and 2004. Patients and methods: 67 pts (46 m, 21 f) initially diagnosed with Hodgkin’s lymphoma (stage I; n=2, stage II; n=29, stage III; n=22 and stage IV; n=14) received first-line chemotherapy with ABVD or COP/ABVD (n=20), BEMOP-CA (n=29), COPP or similar (n=14) or mantle radiotherapy alone (n=4). High dose chemotherapy (HDC) with LACE and ASCT was undertaken in 45 of these pts in 1st relapse, 15 pts in 2nd or subsequent relapse and 7 pts with refractory disease. Median age at the time of HDC was 32 y (17 – 70 y). Prior to ASCT further chemotherapy achieved a complete or partial remission in 41 pts (chemosensitive), but 26 pts had no significant response (chemoresistant). Stem cells were mobilised with Etoposide (1.8 g/m2) and G-CSF in 56 pts, and bone marrow harvest was performed in the other 11 pts. Results: Two pts suffered a treatment-related mortality (TRM) within the first 100 days (3%). Two pts (3%) developed secondary malignancy (acute myeloid leukaemia). With a median follow-up of 43.3 months (range 0.5 – 145.5 months) the cumulative probabilities of overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) at both 5 and 10 years was 70% and 62% respectively. Pts who had chemosensitive disease at the time of ASCT had a better OS (p=0.008) and PFS (p=0.08) when compared with pts who had chemoresistant disease. Median PFS has not yet been reached for chemosensitive pts but was 23.4 months for chemoresistant pts. Median OS has not yet been reached for either group. Conclusions: The outcome for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin’s lymphoma following high dose chemotherapy and ASCT has been sufficiently encouraging to suggest that ASCT should be considered early in chemosensitive patients. However, new therapeutic strategies are needed to improve the clinical outcome of patients with chemoresistant disease.

Brentuximab Vedotin in Pretreated Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 3866-3866
Author(s):  
Dada Reyad ◽  
Fawwaz Khalid Yassin ◽  
Mohamed Bayoumy
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Transplantation ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Brentuximab Vedotin ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose

Abstract Introduction : The outcome of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) has improved over the past 20 years. However, the probability of relapse after response to initial treatment is currently approximately 10 to 15 percent for localized HL (i.e. stage I and II) and 20 to 40 percent for advanced stages (i.e. IIIB and IV), dependent on prognostic factors [1]. In young patients eligible for dose intensive chemotherapy, salvage chemotherapy with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is a frequently used therapy option and can be considered as standard [2, 3]. Patients who relapse following ASCT and those not eligible for myeloablative therapy are being treated with conventional chemotherapy or new novel agents such brentuximab vedotin (BV). Since approval of BV several study groups published the results of their experience in treating refractory/relapsed HL patients with BV. Patients and methods: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of BV on outcome of patients with refractory and relapsed HL. In this systematic review we analyzed the published data on refractory / relapsed Hodgkin lymphoma patients who received BV as single agent. A systematic literature search was performed and included studies published from 1st January 2000 to 1st July 2015 in PubMed, electronic databases EMBASE (Dialog), Cochrane Library, DIMDI-Recherche and MEDPILOT. We used the key words brentuximab, brentuximab vedotein, adcetris, CD30 antibody and SGN-35. Recent conference abstracts from the American Society for Clinical Oncology (ASCO) (2012-2015) and American Society of Hematology (ASH) (2012-2014) were also included. Serial reports of 5 patients and more were included. If several publications from same author and group were published, the publications were re-scanned whether the reported patients' cohorts are the same. We included patients treated with BV pre- and post-transplantation as well as those not eligible for transplantation. Publications reporting about experience with BV in several diseases, e.g. T cell lymphoma and HL, underwent special analysis in order to extract only the HL data. Studies using BV in combination with radiation were disqualified for our analysis. Results: 51 out of 5369 screened records met the eligibility criteria. After exclusion of duplicates and serial reports with <5 patients total of 22 records (17 full articles and 5 abstracts) were included. Data of 903 patients treated with BV as salvage treatment was collected. The median age of the cohort was 31 year (range: 26-45). The patients received in median 4 lines (range: 1-9) of chemotherapy prior to BV. Median follow up was 16.1 months (range: 4.5-45.1). Most patients were heavily pretreated, 529/903 and 232/903 underwent high dose chemotherapy and autologous stem transplantation or received allogeneic stem transplantation prior of BV respectively. The response rate was 62.7% (range: 30-100%). The complete remission, partial remission, stable disease and progressive disease rates were 31.8%, 35.1%, 19.5% and 11.7% respectively. The one year progression free survival and estimated one year overall survival were 47.7% and 70% respectively. Conclusion: Significant number of the cohort received autologous and/or allogeneic stem cell transplantation prior BV. Response rate of 62.7% and complete remission rate of 31.8% are supporting results of the pivotal study [4] and establish the solid basis for using BV in heavily pretreated HL patients. Litreature: 1. Josting, A., et al., New prognostic score based on treatment outcome of patients with relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma registered in the database of the German Hodgkin's lymphoma study group. J Clin Oncol, 2002. 20 (1): p. 221-30. 2. Sirohi, B., et al., Long-term outcome of autologous stem-cell transplantation in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. Ann Oncol, 2008. 19 (7): p. 1312-9. 3. Rancea, M., et al., High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013. 6: p. CD009411. 4. Younes, A., et al., Results of a pivotal phase II study of brentuximab vedotin for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's lymphoma. J Clin Oncol, 2012. 30 (18): p. 2183-9. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document