Metapopulation analysis indicates native and non-native fishes respond differently to effects of wildfire on desert streams

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 376-392 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Whitney ◽  
Keith B. Gido ◽  
Tyler J. Pilger ◽  
David L. Propst ◽  
Thomas F. Turner
Keyword(s):  
Native Fishes ◽  
Desert Streams

Landscape-scale survey of non-native fishes near ornamental aquaculture facilities in Florida, USA

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 223-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quenton M. Tuckett ◽  
Jared L. Ritch ◽  
Katelyn M. Lawson ◽  
Jeffrey E. Hill
Keyword(s):  
Landscape Scale ◽  
Native Fishes ◽  
Aquaculture Facilities

Native Fishes of Idaho

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Wallace ◽  
◽  
Donald W. Zaroban ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Native Fishes

scholarly journals An Intermittent Stream Supports Extensive Spawning of Large‐River Native Fishes

2019 ◽  
Vol 148 (2) ◽  
pp. 426-441 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zachary E. Hooley‐Underwood ◽  
Summer B. Stevens ◽  
Nicholas R. Salinas ◽  
Kevin G. Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Large River ◽  
Intermittent Stream ◽  
Native Fishes

scholarly journals Evaluating the Conservation Potential of Tributaries for Native Fishes in the Upper Colorado River Basin

Fisheries ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 194-206 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian G. Laub ◽  
Gary P. Thiede ◽  
William W. Macfarlane ◽  
Phaedra Budy
Keyword(s):  
River Basin ◽  
Colorado River ◽  
Colorado River Basin ◽  
Upper Colorado River Basin ◽  
Native Fishes

Invasion of a Headwater Stream by Non-Native Fishes in the Swartkops River System, South Africa

2011 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-46 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce R. Ellender ◽  
Olaf L.F. Weyl ◽  
Ernst R. Swartz
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
River System ◽  
Headwater Stream ◽  
Native Fishes

scholarly journals The first unified inventory of non-native fishes of the South Caucasian countries, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia

2021 ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Tatia Kuljanishvili ◽  
Levan Mumladze ◽  
Bella Japoshvili ◽  
Namig Mustafayev ◽  
Shaig Ibrahimov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Black Sea ◽  
Fish Species ◽  
Caspian Sea ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Biological Diversity ◽  
Native Fish ◽  
The Black Sea ◽  
The South ◽  
In The Wild ◽  
Native Fishes

The South Caucasus (SC) region is recognized for its high biological diversity and various endemic animal taxa. The area has experienced many fish introductions over the years, but the overall information about non-native fishes in the three SC countries, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia did not exist. Although these three countries belong to the Kura River drainage, Caspian Sea basin (only the western half of Georgia drains into the Black Sea), the legislative framework for each country regarding introduction of non-native fish species and their treatment is different and poorly developed. The goal of the present study was to make an initial inventory of non-native fish species in the three SC countries, and summarize the existing knowledge as a basis for future risk assessment models and formulation of regional management policies. Here, we present a unified list of 27 non-native species recorded in the wild in Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia. Among these 27 species, eight were translocated from the Black Sea basin to the Caspian Sea basin. Out of these 27 non-native fishes, 15 species have become established (three of them being considered invasive) and six fish species could not survive in the wild.

scholarly journals What is needed to restore native fishes in Australia’s Murray–Darling Basin?

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (11) ◽  
pp. 1464
Author(s):  
John D. Koehn ◽  
Stephen R. Balcombe ◽  
Lee J. Baumgartner ◽  
Christopher M. Bice ◽  
Kate Burndred ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
First Nations ◽  
Native Species ◽  
Cultural Practices ◽  
Native Fish ◽  
The Past ◽  
Murray Darling Basin ◽  
Native Fishes ◽  
Conservation Concern ◽  
First Nations People

The Murray–Darling Basin (MDB) is Australia’s food bowl, contributing 40% of agricultural production and supporting a population of over 4 million people. Historically, the MDB supported a unique native fish community with significant cultural, subsistence, recreational, commercial and ecological values. Approximately one-quarter of the MDB’s native species are endemic. Changes to river flows and habitats have led to a >90% decline in native fish populations over the past 150 years, with almost half the species now of conservation concern. Commercial fisheries have collapsed, and important traditional cultural practices of First Nations People have been weakened. The past 20 years have seen significant advances in the scientific understanding of native fish ecology, the effects of human-related activities and the recovery measures needed. The science is well established, and some robust restoration-enabling policies have been initiated to underpin actions. What is now required is the political vision and commitment to support investment to drive long-term recovery. We present a summary of 30 priority activities urgently needed to restore MDB native fishes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document