scholarly journals Otaru consensus on biliary stenting for unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 58-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akio Katanuma ◽  
Atushi Irisawa ◽  
Takao Itoi
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Biliary Stenting ◽  
Hilar Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

scholarly journals Percutaneous stent placement for malignant hilar biliary obstruction: side-by-side versus stent-in-stent technique

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei-zhong Zhou ◽  
Sheng Liu ◽  
Zheng-Qiang Yang ◽  
Yu-Tao Xian ◽  
Hong-Dou Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Serum Bilirubin Level ◽  
Stent Insertion ◽  
Technical Success ◽  
Stent Deployment ◽  
Stent Patency ◽  
Hilar Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Bilateral Stenting ◽  
Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction

Abstract Background: Currently, side-by-side (SBS) and stent-in-stent (SIS) are the two main techniques for stent deployment to treat hilar biliary obstructions. Previous studies comparing these two techniques are very limited, and thus, no consensus has been reached on which technique is better. The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of SBS and SIS deployment via a percutaneous approach for malignant hilar biliary obstruction.Methods: From July 2012 to April 2019, 65 patients with malignant hilar biliary obstruction who underwent bilateral stenting using either the SBS or SIS techniques were included in this study. Among them, 27 patients underwent SIS stent insertion (SIS group), and the remaining 38 patients underwent SBS stent insertion (SBS group). Technical success, improvement of jaundice, complications, duration of stent patency, and overall survival were evaluated.Results: Technical success was achieved in all patients in the two groups. The serum bilirubin level decreased more rapidly 1 week after the procedures in the SBS group than in the SIS group (P=0.02). Although the total complication rate did not differ between the two groups, cholangitis was found to be more frequent in the SIS group (P=0.04). The median stent patency was significantly longer in the SBS group (149 days) than in the SIS group (75 days; P=0.02). The median overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups (SBS vs. SIS, 155 days vs. 143 days; P>0.05).Conclusions: Percutaneous transhepatic bilateral stenting using either the SBS or SIS technique is safe and effective in the management of malignant hilar biliary obstruction. However, SBS offers a quicker improvement of jaundice, a lower incidence of cholangitis after the procedure, and a longer stent patency period than SIS.

Management of malignant hilar biliary obstruction by endoscopy results and prognostic factors

1992 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 778-783 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ducreux ◽  
Cl. Liguory ◽  
J. F. Lefebvre ◽  
O. Ink ◽  
A. Choury ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Hilar Biliary Obstruction ◽  
Malignant Hilar Biliary Obstruction
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document