scholarly journals Analytical guidelines to increase the value of community science data: An example using eBird data to estimate species distributions

Author(s):  
Alison Johnston ◽  
Wesley M. Hochachka ◽  
Matthew E. Strimas‐Mackey ◽  
Viviana Ruiz Gutierrez ◽  
Orin J. Robinson ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iman Momeni‐Dehaghi ◽  
Joseph R. Bennett ◽  
Greg W. Mitchell ◽  
Trina Rytwinski ◽  
Lenore Fahrig

Evolution ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas M. Justyn ◽  
Corey T. Callaghan ◽  
Geoffrey E. Hill

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Borowicz ◽  
Heather J. Lynch ◽  
Tyler Estro ◽  
Catherine Foley ◽  
Bento Gonçalves ◽  
...  

Expansive study areas, such as those used by highly-mobile species, provide numerous logistical challenges for researchers. Community science initiatives have been proposed as a means of overcoming some of these challenges but often suffer from low uptake or limited long-term participation rates. Nevertheless, there are many places where the public has a much higher visitation rate than do field researchers. Here we demonstrate a passive means of collecting community science data by sourcing ecological image data from the digital public, who act as “eco-social sensors,” via a public photo-sharing platform—Flickr. To achieve this, we use freely-available Python packages and simple applications of convolutional neural networks. Using the Weddell seal (Leptonychotes weddellii) on the Antarctic Peninsula as an example, we use these data with field survey data to demonstrate the viability of photo-identification for this species, supplement traditional field studies to better understand patterns of habitat use, describe spatial and sex-specific signals in molt phenology, and examine behavioral differences between the Antarctic Peninsula’s Weddell seal population and better-studied populations in the species’ more southerly fast-ice habitat. While our analyses are unavoidably limited by the relatively small volume of imagery currently available, this pilot study demonstrates the utility an eco-social sensors approach, the value of ad hoc wildlife photography, the role of geographic metadata for the incorporation of such imagery into ecological analyses, the remaining challenges of computer vision for ecological applications, and the viability of pelage patterns for use in individual recognition for this species.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Johnston ◽  
WM Hochachka ◽  
ME Strimas-Mackey ◽  
V Ruiz Gutierrez ◽  
OJ Robinson ◽  
...  

AbstractCitizen science data are valuable for addressing a wide range of ecological research questions, and there has been a rapid increase in the scope and volume of data available. However, data from large-scale citizen science projects typically present a number of challenges that can inhibit robust ecological inferences. These challenges include: species bias, spatial bias, and variation in effort.To demonstrate addressing key challenges in analysing citizen science data, we use the example of estimating species distributions with data from eBird, a large semi-structured citizen science project. We estimate two widely applied metrics of species distributions: encounter rate and occupancy probability. For each metric, we assess the impact of data processing steps that either degrade or refine the data used in the analyses. We also test whether differences in model performance are maintained at different sample sizes.Model performance improved when data processing and analytical methods addressed the challenges arising from citizen science data. The largest gains in model performance were achieved with: 1) the use of complete checklists (where observers report all the species they detect and identify); and 2) the use of covariates describing variation in effort and detectability for each checklist. Occupancy models were more robust to a lack of complete checklists and effort variables. Improvements in model performance with data refinement were more evident with larger sample sizes.Here, we describe processes to refine semi-structured citizen science data to estimate species distributions. We demonstrate the value of complete checklists, which can inform the design and adaptation of citizen science projects. We also demonstrate the value of information on effort. The methods we have outlined are also likely to improve other forms of inference, and will enable researchers to conduct robust analyses and harness the vast ecological knowledge that exists within citizen science data.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (9) ◽  
pp. e0257226
Author(s):  
Mei-Ling Emily Feng ◽  
Judy Che-Castaldo

Biodiversity loss is a global ecological crisis that is both a driver of and response to environmental change. Understanding the connections between species declines and other components of human-natural systems extends across the physical, life, and social sciences. From an analysis perspective, this requires integration of data from different scientific domains, which often have heterogeneous scales and resolutions. Community science projects such as eBird may help to fill spatiotemporal gaps and enhance the resolution of standardized biological surveys. Comparisons between eBird and the more comprehensive North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) have found these datasets can produce consistent multi-year abundance trends for bird populations at national and regional scales. Here we investigate the reliability of these datasets for estimating patterns at finer resolutions, inter-annual changes in abundance within town boundaries. Using a case study of 14 focal species within Massachusetts, we calculated four indices of annual relative abundance using eBird and BBS datasets, including two different modeling approaches within each dataset. We compared the correspondence between these indices in terms of multi-year trends, annual estimates, and inter-annual changes in estimates at the state and town-level. We found correspondence between eBird and BBS multi-year trends, but this was not consistent across all species and diminished at finer, inter-annual temporal resolutions. We further show that standardizing modeling approaches can increase index reliability even between datasets at coarser temporal resolutions. Our results indicate that multiple datasets and modeling methods should be considered when estimating species population dynamics at finer temporal resolutions, but standardizing modeling approaches may improve estimate correspondence between abundance datasets. In addition, reliability of these indices at finer spatial scales may depend on habitat composition, which can impact survey accuracy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 422 ◽  
pp. 108927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Johnston ◽  
Nick Moran ◽  
Andy Musgrove ◽  
Daniel Fink ◽  
Stephen R. Baillie

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paige E. Howell ◽  
Patrick K. Devers ◽  
Orin J. Robinson ◽  
J. Andrew Royle

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Christopher B. Mowry ◽  
Adel Lee ◽  
Zachary P. Taylor ◽  
Nadeem Hamid ◽  
Shannon Whitney ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 248 ◽  
pp. 108653 ◽  
Author(s):  
Montague H.C. Neate-Clegg ◽  
Joshua J. Horns ◽  
Frederick R. Adler ◽  
M. Çisel Kemahlı Aytekin ◽  
Çağan H. Şekercioğlu

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary M. Gardiner ◽  
Kayla I. Perry ◽  
Christopher B. Riley ◽  
Katherine J. Turo ◽  
Yvan A. Delgado de la flor ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document