scholarly journals Asking young Aboriginal people who use illicit drugs about their healthcare preferences using audio‐computer‐assisted self‐interviewing

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 482-493
Author(s):  
Marianne Dowsett ◽  
M. Mofizul Islam ◽  
Christopher Ganora ◽  
Carolyn Day ◽  
K. S. Kylie Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Illicit Drugs ◽  
Aboriginal People ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Audio Computer

Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing in reproductive health research: reliability assessment among women in Harare, Zimbabwe

Contraception ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 75 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra M. Minnis ◽  
Angella Muchini ◽  
Stephen Shiboski ◽  
Magda Mwale ◽  
Charles Morrison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reproductive Health ◽  
Health Research ◽  
Reliability Assessment ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Audio Computer

Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interview Alcohol, Smoking and Substance Involvement Screening Test

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer McNeely ◽  
Shiela M. Strauss ◽  
John Rotrosen ◽  
Arianne Ramautar ◽  
Marc N. Gourevitch
Keyword(s):  
Screening Test ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Audio Computer ◽  
Substance Involvement

scholarly journals Completing Self-administered Questionnaires: Hmong Older Adults and Their Family Helpers

Field Methods ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-273
Author(s):  
Maichou Lor ◽  
Nora Cate Schaeffer ◽  
Roger L. Brown ◽  
Barbara J. Bowers
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Video Recordings ◽  
English Speaking ◽  
Interview Instrument ◽  
Audio Computer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Answering Questions

This study describes a method for collecting data from nonliterate, non-English-speaking populations. Our audio computer-assisted self-interview instrument with color-labeled response categories was designed for use with helper assistance. The study included 30 dyads of nonliterate older Hmong respondents and family helpers answering questions about health. Analysis of video recordings identified respondents’ problems and helpers’ strategies to address these problems. Seven dyads displayed the paradigmatic question–answer sequence for all items, while 23 departed from the paradigmatic sequence at least once. Reports and pauses were the most common signs of problems displayed by respondents. Paraphrasing questions or response categories and providing examples were the most common helper strategies. Future research could assess the impact of helpers’ strategies on data quality.

Sexually Active HIV-Positive Patients Frequently Report Never Using Condoms in Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviews Conducted at Routine Clinical Visits

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 123-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce R. Schackman ◽  
Zubin Dastur ◽  
Quanhong Ni ◽  
Mark A. Callahan ◽  
Judith Berger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hiv Positive ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Sexually Active ◽  
Audio Computer

The Carryover Effects of Preceding Interviewer–Respondent Interaction on Responses in Audio Computer-Assisted Self-Interviewing (ACASI)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanyu Sun ◽  
Frederick G Conrad ◽  
Frauke Kreuter
Keyword(s):  
Social Presence ◽  
Computer Assisted ◽  
Sensitive Information ◽  
Carryover Effects ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Audio Recordings ◽  
The Face ◽  
Audio Computer ◽  
Main Effects ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) has been widely used to collect sensitive information from respondents in face-to-face interviews. Interviewers ask questions that are not sensitive or only moderately sensitive and then allow respondents to self-administer more sensitive questions, listening to audio recordings of the questions and typically entering their responses directly into the same device that the interviewer has used. According to the conventional thinking, ACASI is taken as independent of the face-to-face interaction that almost always precedes it. Presumably as a result of this presumed independence, the respondents’ prior interaction with the interviewer is rarely considered when assessing the quality of ACASI responses. There is no body of existing research that has experimentally investigated how the preceding interviewer–respondent interaction may create sufficient social presence to affect responses in the subsequent ACASI module. The study reported here, a laboratory experiment with eight professional interviewers and 125 respondents, explores the carryover effects of preceding interactions between interviewer and respondent on responses in the subsequent ACASI. We evaluated the impact of the similarity of the live and recorded interviewer’s voice for each respondent as well as respondents’ rapport with interviewers in the preceding interview. We did not find significant main effects of vocal similarity on disclosure in ACASI. However, we found significant interaction effects between vocal similarity and respondents’ rapport ratings in the preceding interview on disclosure in ACASI. When the ACASI voice was similar to the interviewer’s voice in the preceding interaction, respondent-rated rapport led to more disclosure but, when the ACASI voice is clearly different from the interviewer’s voice, respondent-rated rapport in the prior interaction did not affect disclosure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document