scholarly journals Corrigendum to: Integrating real‐world data and modeling to project changes in femoral neck bone mineral density and fracture risk in premenopausal women

2021 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Real World ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data

scholarly journals Genome-Wide Association Study of Bone Mineral Density in Premenopausal European-American Women and Replication in African-American Women

2010 ◽  
Vol 95 (4) ◽  
pp. 1802-1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel L. Koller ◽  
Shoji Ichikawa ◽  
Dongbing Lai ◽  
Leah R. Padgett ◽  
Kimberly F. Doheny ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
African American ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Genome Wide Association ◽  
European American ◽  
Supporting Evidence ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Genome Wide

Abstract Context: Several genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been performed to identify genes contributing to bone mineral density (BMD), typically in samples of elderly women and men. Objective: The objective of the study was to identify genes contributing to BMD in premenopausal women. Design: GWAS using the Illumina 610Quad array in premenopausal European-American (EA) women and replication of the top 50 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for two BMD measures in African-American (AA) women. Subjects: Subjects included 1524 premenopausal EA women aged 20–45 yr from 762 sibships and 669 AA premenopausal women aged 20–44 yr from 383 sibships. Interventions: There were no interventions. Main Outcome Measures: BMD was measured at the lumbar spine and femoral neck by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Age- and weight-adjusted BMD values were tested for association with each SNP, with P values determined by permutation. Results: SNPs in CATSPERB on chromosome 14 provided evidence of association with femoral neck BMD (rs1298989, P = 2.7 × 10−5; rs1285635, P = 3.0 × 10−5) in the EA women, and some supporting evidence was also observed with these SNPs in the AA women (rs1285635, P = 0.003). Genes identified in other BMD GWAS studies, including IBSP and ADAMTS18, were also among the most significant findings in our GWAS. Conclusions: Evidence of association to several novel loci was detected in a GWAS of premenopausal EA women, and SNPs in one of these loci also provided supporting evidence in a sample of AA women.

Vertebral Fracture Risk Is Reduced for Women Who Lose Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density During Teriparatide Treatment

2008 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nelson B. Watts ◽  
Paul D. Miller ◽  
Robert Marcus ◽  
Peiqi Chen ◽  
Jody Arsenault ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Vertebral Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Teriparatide Treatment ◽  
Vertebral Fracture Risk

scholarly journals Diabetes and Femoral Neck Strength: Findings from The Hip Strength Across the Menopausal Transition Study

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 190-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinya Ishii ◽  
Jane A. Cauley ◽  
Carolyn J. Crandall ◽  
Preethi Srikanthan ◽  
Gail A. Greendale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Areal Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Femoral Neck Strength ◽  
Composite Indices ◽  
Neck Strength

Context: Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased hip fracture risk, despite being associated with higher bone mineral density in the femoral neck. Objective: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that composite indices of femoral neck strength, which integrate dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry derived femoral neck size, femoral neck areal bone mineral density, and body size and are inversely associated with hip fracture risk, would be lower in diabetics than in nondiabetics and be inversely related to insulin resistance, the primary pathology in type 2 diabetes. Design: This was a cross-sectional analysis. Setting and Participants: The study consisted of a multisite, multiethnic, community-dwelling sample of 1887 women in pre- or early perimenopause. Outcome Measurements: Composite indices for femoral neck strength in different failure modes (axial compression, bending, and impact) were measured. Results: Adjusted for age, race/ethnicity, menopausal stage, body mass index, smoking, physical activity, calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and study site, diabetic women had higher femoral neck areal bone mineral density [+0.25 sd, 95% confidence interval (CI) (+0.06, +0.44) sd] but lower composite strength indices [−0.20 sd, 95% CI (−0.38, −0.03) sd for compression, −0.19 sd, 95% CI (−0.38, −0.003) sd for bending, −0.19 sd, 95% CI (−0.37, −0.02) sd for impact] than nondiabetic women. There were graded inverse relationships between homeostasis model-assessed insulin resistance and all three strength indices, adjusted for the same covariates. Conclusions: Despite having higher bone density, diabetic women have lower indices of femoral neck strength relative to load, consistent with their documented higher fracture risk. Insulin resistance appears to play an important role in bone strength reduction in diabetes.

scholarly journals POS1106 FRAX AND THE EFFECT OF TERIPARATIDE ON BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN SECONDARY OSTEOPOROSIS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 833.2-834
Author(s):  
S. Garcia ◽  
B. M. Fernandes ◽  
M. Rato ◽  
F. Oliveira Pinheiro ◽  
D. Fonseca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Fracture Probability ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
T Score

Background:Teriparatide has been shown to increase spine and hip bone mineral density (BMD) and to reduce vertebral and non-vertebral fractures. (1) It is currently not clear whether the effect of teriparatide is dependent on the baseline risk of fracture or osteoporosis (OP) type, a finding that could have an impact on our therapeutic decision.Objectives:Investigate if there is a relationship between teriparatide effect in BMD and baseline 10-year fracture probability, assessed using FRAX®, in primary and secondary OP patients.Methods:This is a longitudinal, retrospective study including consecutive patients with the diagnosis of OP treated with teriparatide for 24 months, with a ten-year follow-up period, at our rheumatology department. Demographic, clinical, laboratorial, BMD and occurrence of fracture data were collected. The 10-year risk of osteoporotic fracture was estimated using the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) v 4.1 with the Portuguese population reference. Statistical analysis was performed using the software SPSS 23.0. Correlations between continuous variables were evaluated with spearman coefficient. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Eighty patients (88.8% female, median age 65.00 (59; 75)) were included. Forty-nine patients (61.3%) has secondary OP, mainly of cortisonic etiology (61.2%, n=30). Before treatment, median lumbar spine BMD was 0.870 [0.767, 0.964] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.60 (-3.30, -1.90); median total femur BMD was 0.742 [0.667, 0.863] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.10 (-2.80, -1.30); median femoral neck BMD was 0.671 [0.611, 0.787] g/cm2, median T-score of -2.50 [-3.20, -1.85]. Regarding fracture risk, median FRAX-based 10-year major fracture risk (with BMD) at baseline was 16% [10.0; 23], and median hip fracture risk was 7.2% [3.4; 13.8].The median variation of BMD, after finishing teriparatide treatment, in the spine was 0.107 [0.029; 0.228]; median BMD variation in total femur was 0.013 [-0.013; 0.068] and median BMD femoral neck was 0.046 [-0.002; 0.109]. We observed a numerically superior effect, albeit without any statistical significance, of teriparatide on bone mineral density gain in secondary OP (versus primary OP) at lumbar spine, total femur and femoral neck.Most patients continued anti-osteoporotic treatment with a bisphosphonate (81.2%, n=65) and, during follow-up, 17 patients had an incident fracture (8 hip fractures and 6 vertebral fractures), median of 5 [1.75, 8.25] years after ending teriparatide.We found a discrete correlation between FRAX-based hip fracture probability and the variation of bone mineral density in total femur (Spearman’s coefficient 0.248, p = 0.04). There was no correlation between FRAX-based major fracture probability and and the variation of bone mineral density in the spine or femur. When we separately analyze the relationship between the variation in total hip BMD and the FRAX-based fracture risk, depending on whether it is a secondary or primary OP, we find that the correlation is stronger and only remains in secondary OP (Spearman’s coefficient 0.348, p = 0.03).Conclusion:Our data suggest that teriparatide could be an important weapon in the treatment of secondary cause OP, particularly cortisonic, and in patients at high fracture risk, although further larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.References:[1]Kendler DL, Marin F, Zerbini CAF, Russo LA, Greenspan SL, Zikan V, Bagur A, Malouf-Sierra J, Lakatos P, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Lespessailles E, Minisola S, Body JJ, Geusens P, Möricke R, López-Romero P. Effects of teriparatide and risedronate on new fractures in post-menopausal women with severe osteoporosis (VERO): a multicentre, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2018 Jan 20;391(10117):230-240. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32137-2.Disclosure of Interests:None declared.

Cytokine Production and Bone Mineral Density at the Lumbar Spine and Femoral Neck in Premenopausal Women

1998 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 466-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. Salamone ◽  
T. Whiteside ◽  
D. Friberg ◽  
R. S. Epstein ◽  
L. H. Kuller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Cytokine Production ◽  
Premenopausal Women ◽  
Mineral Density

scholarly journals SAT0482 FRAX 10-YR FRACTURE RISK IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS ASSESSED WITH AND WITHOUT BONE MINERAL DENSITY – ARE WE TREATING OUR PATIENTS UNDER bDMARDs?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1197.1-1198
Author(s):  
M. Rato ◽  
F. Pinheiro ◽  
S. Garcia ◽  
B. M. Fernandes ◽  
S. Ganhão ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
High Fracture ◽  
Erosive Disease

Background:Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) have a higher risk of osteoporosis not only due to chronic inflammation status, but also due to the treatment with glucocorticoids. FRAX is a computer-based algorithm developed by the World Health Organization for estimation of the 10-year risk of a hip or major osteoporotic fracture. Inclusion of femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) in the estimation is optional.Objectives:The study aimed to identify the RA patients under treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), who have FRAX scores, calculated with and without BMD, classified as high fracture risk and evaluate if they are receiving treatment for osteoporosis. The authors also investigated the intra-individual agreement between FRAX fracture risk calculated with and without BMD.Methods:Demographic and clinical data and BMD results from RA patients followed in a tertiary university hospital and registered in the Rheumatic Diseases Portuguese Register were used for analysis. Patients under 40 years of age at the last visit were excluded. McNemar test was applied for the identification of discordance of risk categories. The Wilcoxon test was used to characterize the intraindividual differences between paired FRAX risks with and without BMD. Correlations between pairs of variables were evaluated by the Spearman test. For independent variables Mann-Whitney test was used.Results:A total of 303 patients were included, 244 were females (80.5%) and 49 current smokers (16.2%). Mean age was 59.5 ± 9.54 years and mean disease duration 18.5 ± 10.4 years. Two hundred and twenty patients (72.4%) and 243 (80.2%) were RF and ACPA positive, respectively, and 51.5% had erosive disease. Mean disease activity score (DAS28-4V-CRP) was 3.08 ± 1.18 and mean femoral neck BMD 0.84 ± 0.12 g/cm2. One hundred and seventy nine patients (58.9%) were concomitantly treated with conventional synthetic DMARDs and 215 (70.7%) with glucocorticoids. Among all the patients, 35 (11.6%) had previous fractures and 19 (6.3%) have family history of fracture. The median 10-year risk of a major fracture and a hip fracture, calculated without BMD, was 6.0 (1.2-50) and 1.5 (0.1-39), respectively; with BMD it was 6.9 (1.3-61) and 1.7 (0-49). When FRAX score is calculated without BMD (n=303), 76 (25.1%) patients were categorized as high fracture risk. Among them, only 41 (54%) were receiving osteoporosis treatment. FRAX assessment with BMD (n=231) identified 99 (32.7%) patients with high fracture risk, 51 (51,5%) in treatment for osteoporosis. Thirty patients (21%) previously classified as low fracture risk using FRAX without BMD were recategorized as high risk (p<0.001). Despite that, there was a strong correlation between fracture risks assessed with and without BMD for both major and hip fracture (r = 0.867, p < 0.0001 and r = 0.728, p < 0.0001, respectively). ACPA and RF positive patients did not have higher FRAX scores (including or not BMA). Patients with erosive disease had a higher 10-year probability of major fracture evaluated by FRAX when it includes BMD (p=0.041).Conclusion:It is very important to accurately assess the risk of osteoporotic fractures in RA patients to treat them properly. The authors highlight the high number of patients who are not receiving treatment according to FRAX categorization. In spite of the correlation between estimated fracture risk by FRAX with and without BMD, there is a discordance in fracture risk categorization, as one fifth of patients of low risk were reclassified as high risk. For the RA population treated with bDMARDS, our findings raise the need to request a DXA not only for patients classified as having an intermediate risk of fracture, but also for low-risk patients.Disclosure of Interests:Maria Rato: None declared, Filipe Pinheiro: None declared, Salomé Garcia: None declared, Bruno Miguel Fernandes: None declared, Sara Ganhão: None declared, Rita Gaio: None declared, Miguel Bernardes Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Biogen, Eli-Lilly, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Alexandra Bernardo: None declared, Lúcia Costa: None declared

scholarly journals The Impact of Glucose Tolerance States on Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Rate

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A279-A280
Author(s):  
Maria Chang Villacreses ◽  
Panadeekarn Panjawatanan ◽  
Rudruidee Karnchanasorn ◽  
Horng-Yih Ou ◽  
Wei Feng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Glucose Tolerance ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Fracture Rate ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
The Impact

Abstract It is generally acknowledged that fracture rate is higher in diabetic subjects than non-diabetic subjects. However, the impact of diabetes on bone is less clear due to contradictory results of bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture rate. To date, most of reports were based on the studies from relatively small sample sizes. To clarify the issues, we examined the fracture rates and BMD across a spectrum of glucose tolerance in a representative US population. The participants of the National Health and Nutrition Survey 2005–2010 were used in this study. Among adult subjects (age≥20 years old) with reported BMI, we were able to define the states of glucose tolerance in 31,073 subjects cording to the diagnostic criteria based on HbA1c, fasting glucose, and/or 2-h post-changed glucose with established diabetes and using diabetes medications, into normal glucose tolerance (NGT), abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT), and diabetes mellitus (DM). Those who received osteoporosis medications were excluded from BMD analysis. Fracture information was available in 15,547 subjects; validated hip BMD was available in 12,317 subjects; and validated lumbar spine BMD was available in 10,329 subjects. Fracture rates were compared among 3 groups of glucose tolerance states and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated in reference to the NGT group with sample weighting. BMD was compared among 3 groups of glucose tolerance with consideration of covariates. The reported osteoporosis diagnosed rate differed among 3 groups of glucose tolerances (3.99%, 5.77%, and 8.41%, P&lt;0.001, for NGT, AGT, and DM respectively). Worsening states of glucose tolerance were associated increased fracture OR at Hip [AGT, 2.1770 (95% CI: 2.1732–2.1807) and DM, 2.7369 (95% CI: 2.7315–2.7423)], spine [AGT, 0.9924 (95% CI: 0.9912–0.9936); DM, 1.2405 (95% CI: 1.2387–1.2423)]. In contrast, a different trend was observed on the wrist fracture rate [AGT, 0.9556 (95% CI: 0.9551–0.9562); DM, 0.9053 (95% CI: 0.9045–0.9060)]. After adjustment for covariates, higher BMD was noted in AGT and DM when compared to NGT at total femur (NGT, 0.9760±0.0015 gm/cm2; AGT, 0.9853±0.0021 gm/cm2; DM 0.9847±0.0034 gm/cm2, mean±SE, P=0.001) and femoral neck (NGT, 0.8388±0.0015 gm/cm2; AGT, 0.8474±0.0020 gm/cm2; DM, 0.8496±0.0032 gm/cm2, P=0.0007) while no difference was found in lumbar spine BMD (NGT, 0.1.0441±0.0018 gm/cm2; AGT, 1.0406±0.0025 gm/cm2; DM, 1.0464±0.0041 gm/cm2, P=0.35). Our observed significant increased fracture risk at hip (OR: 2.7369) and lumbar spine (OR: 1.2405) in DM subjects when compared to NGT subjects. DM subjects had higher BMD at total femur and femoral neck than NGT subjects while no difference was noted at lumbar spine BMD when compared to NGT subjects. Further studies are required to explore the discrepancy between the increased fracture risk with higher BMDs in diabetes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document