scholarly journals Identifying payments for ecosystem services participants through social or spatial targeting? Exploring the outcomes of group level contracts

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesca L. McGrath ◽  
Beria Leimona ◽  
Sacha Amaruzaman ◽  
Nana P. Rahadian ◽  
Luis R. Carrasco
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Payments For Ecosystem Services ◽  
Group Level ◽  
Spatial Targeting

Spatial targeting of payments for ecosystem services Based on SWAT Model and cost-benefit analysis

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (24) ◽  
pp. 7722-7729 ◽  
Author(s):  
宋晓谕 SONG Xiaoyu ◽  
刘玉卿 LIU Yuqing ◽  
邓晓红 DENG Xiaohong ◽  
徐中民 XU Zhongmin
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Swat Model ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Payments For Ecosystem Services ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Spatial Targeting

scholarly journals Allocating Group-Level Payments for Ecosystem Services: Experiences from a REDD+ Pilot in Tanzania

Resources ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 43 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Robinson ◽  
H. Albers ◽  
Razack Lokina ◽  
Charles Meshack
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Payments For Ecosystem Services ◽  
Group Level

A systematic review of scientific publications on the effects of payments for ecosystem services in Latin America, 2000–2020

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 101270
Author(s):  
Maria Perevochtchikova ◽  
Ricardo Castro-Díaz ◽  
Alfonso Langle-Flores ◽  
Juan José Von Thaden Ugalde
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Latin America ◽  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Payments For Ecosystem Services ◽  
Scientific Publications

Multi-level social-ecological networks in a payments for ecosystem services programme in central Veracruz, Mexico

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Alfonso Langle-Flores ◽  
Adriana Aguilar Rodríguez ◽  
Humberto Romero-Uribe ◽  
Julia Ros-Cuéllar ◽  
Juan José Von Thaden
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Spatial Scales ◽  
Payments For Ecosystem Services ◽  
Collaboration Network ◽  
Governmental Organizations ◽  
Social Ecological ◽  
Non Governmental Organizations ◽  
Conservation Activity ◽  
Ecological Importance ◽  
Hydrological Services

Summary Payments for ecosystem services (PES) programmes have been considered an important conservation mechanism to avoid deforestation. These environmental policies act in social and ecological contexts at different spatial scales. We evaluated the social-ecological fit between stakeholders and ecosystem processes in a local PES programme across three levels: social, ecological and social-ecological. We explored collaboration among stakeholders, assessed connectivity between forest units and evaluated conservation activity links between stakeholders and forest units. In addition, to increase programme effectiveness, we classified forest units based on their social and ecological importance. Our main findings suggest that non-governmental organizations occupy brokerage positions between landowners and government in a dense collaboration network. We also found a partial spatial misfit between conservation activity links and the forest units that provide the most hydrological services to Xalapa. We conclude that conservation efforts should be directed towards the middle and high part of the Pixquiac sub-watershed and that the role of non-governmental organizations as mediators should be strengthened to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the local PES programme.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document