Race, Gender, Exclusion, and Divine Discontent: Pauli Murray and the Intersections of Liberation and Reconciliation

CrossCurrents ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 373-399
Author(s):  
Gary Dorrien
Keyword(s):  
Gender Exclusion

Left-behind women: gender exclusion and inequality in rural-urban migration in China†

2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 910-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingzhong Ye ◽  
Huifang Wu ◽  
Jing Rao ◽  
Baoyin Ding ◽  
Keyun Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Urban Migration ◽  
Left Behind ◽  
Rural Urban Migration ◽  
Gender Exclusion

scholarly journals The Effect of Poverty, Gender Exclusion, and Child Labor on Out-of-School Rates for Female Children

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 162-181
Author(s):  
Leopoldo Laborda Castillo ◽  
Daniel Sotelsek Salem ◽  
Leopold Remi Sarr
Keyword(s):  
Child Labor ◽  
Female Children ◽  
Out Of School ◽  
Gender Exclusion

Gender exclusion in social security protection: evidence from Korea

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 62-78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joonmo Cho ◽  
Jaeseong Lee ◽  
Taehee Kwon
Keyword(s):  
Social Security ◽  
Gender Exclusion

The 1992 Revision of the Good News Bible: The Context for Revision

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 347-365
Author(s):  
David G. Burke
Keyword(s):  
New Testament ◽  
Old Testament ◽  
Good News ◽  
Revision Process ◽  
Spoken English ◽  
Bible Translations ◽  
Rapid Shift ◽  
Gender Exclusion

This article surveys the wider context in the 1970s–1980s that compelled Bible publishers to prepare revisions of their translations: the rapid shift in spoken English was making the masculine-heavy English of major Bible translations feel antiquated to readers. The Good News Bible New Testament was first published in 1966 and its Old Testament in 1976, but already by the mid-1980s revision was being contemplated by the American Bible Society. The revision process was thoroughgoing and collaborative, with all English-using Bible Societies participating. More than 6,000 revisions were proposed and reviewed, with about 2,500 meeting consensus. Most were related to gender-exclusion, but a few were exegetical. Although the United Bible Societies’ Hebrew Old Testament Text Project recommendations on almost 6,000 textual cruxes were published in preliminary form by 1979, the Good News Bible revision process could not incorporate those data. An addendum discusses the addition of the deuterocanonical books in 1979.

scholarly journals Ms. Categorized: Gender, notability, and inequality on Wikipedia

2021 ◽  
pp. 146144482110237
Author(s):  
Francesca Tripodi
Keyword(s):  
Quantitative Analysis ◽  
Gender Inequality ◽  
English Language ◽  
Social Scientists ◽  
Gender Exclusion

Gender is one of the most pervasive and insidious forms of inequality. For example, English-language Wikipedia contains more than 1.5 million biographies about notable writers, inventors, and academics, but less than 19% of these biographies are about women. To try and improve these statistics, activists host “edit-a-thons” to increase the visibility of notable women. While this strategy helps create several biographies previously inexistent, it fails to address a more inconspicuous form of gender exclusion. Drawing on ethnographic observations, interviews, and quantitative analysis of web-scraped metadata, this article demonstrates that biographies about women who meet Wikipedia’s criteria for inclusion are more frequently considered non-notable and nominated for deletion compared to men’s biographies. This disproportionate rate is another dimension of gender inequality previously unexplored by social scientists and provides broader insights into how women’s achievements are (under)valued.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document