scholarly journals Immoral Professors and Malfunctioning Tools: Counterfactual Relevance Accounts Explain the Effect of Norm Violations on Causal Selection

2019 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan F. Kominsky ◽  
Jonathan Phillips
2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Scott Phillips ◽  
Jonathan F. Kominsky

This repository contains the supporting materials for the manuscript: Jonathan Kominsky & Jonathan Phillips, (submitted). Immoral professors and malfunctioning tools: Counterfactual relevance accounts explain the effect of norm violations on causal selection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimmo Eriksson ◽  
Pontus Strimling ◽  
Michele Gelfand ◽  
Junhui Wu ◽  
Jered Abernathy ◽  
...  

AbstractNorm enforcement may be important for resolving conflicts and promoting cooperation. However, little is known about how preferred responses to norm violations vary across cultures and across domains. In a preregistered study of 57 countries (using convenience samples of 22,863 students and non-students), we measured perceptions of the appropriateness of various responses to a violation of a cooperative norm and to atypical social behaviors. Our findings highlight both cultural universals and cultural variation. We find a universal negative relation between appropriateness ratings of norm violations and appropriateness ratings of responses in the form of confrontation, social ostracism and gossip. Moreover, we find the country variation in the appropriateness of sanctions to be consistent across different norm violations but not across different sanctions. Specifically, in those countries where use of physical confrontation and social ostracism is rated as less appropriate, gossip is rated as more appropriate.


2021 ◽  
Vol 91 ◽  
pp. 103120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilian Mihailov ◽  
Blanca Rodríguez López ◽  
Florian Cova ◽  
Ivar R. Hannikainen

2021 ◽  
pp. 019251212097258
Author(s):  
Kerstin Schembera

Regional organisations (ROs) increasingly act as promoters of democracy by applying sanctions against members who do not comply with collectively agreed norms. Despite the absence of an official sanctions policy, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) does interfere in certain ways into member states’ internal issues in some cases of norm violations. This study empirically explores how and why ASEAN decides to interfere or not in such situations. The findings derived from case studies on Cambodia and Myanmar, drawing on evidence from documents, media, and interview data reveal novel insights on ASEAN regionalism in the context of non-compliant member behaviour. I argue that the informal approach to regionalism provides ASEAN with a lot of room for discretion in responding to members’ norm violations. The article identifies geopolitical preferences, extra-regional interference, and legitimation as explanatory factors for the RO’s varying punitive actions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document