Language Reflects “Core” Cognition: A New Theory About the Origin of Cross-Linguistic Regularities

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 70-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent Strickland
Keyword(s):  
Core Cognition

The Epistemic Role of Core Cognition

2020 ◽  
Vol 129 (2) ◽  
pp. 251-298 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zoe Jenkin
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Psychology ◽  
Mental States ◽  
Picture Perception ◽  
Epistemic Status ◽  
Object Representations ◽  
Basing Relation ◽  
The Core ◽  
Core Cognition ◽  
Epistemic Role

According to a traditional picture, perception and belief have starkly different epistemic roles. Beliefs have epistemic statuses as justified or unjustified, depending on how they are formed and maintained. In contrast, perceptions are “unjustified justifiers.” Core cognition is a set of mental systems that stand at the border of perception and belief, and has been extensively studied in developmental psychology. Core cognition's borderline states do not fit neatly into the traditional epistemic picture. What is the epistemic role of these states? Focusing on the core object system, the author argues that core object representations have epistemic statuses like beliefs do, despite their many prototypically perceptual features. First, the author argues that it is a sufficient condition on a mental state's having an epistemic status as justified or unjustified that the state is based on reasons. Then the author argues that core object representations are based on reasons, through an examination of both experimental results and key markers of the basing relation. The scope of mental states that are subject to epistemic evaluation as justified or unjustified is not restricted to beliefs.

A unified account of abstract structure and conceptual change: Probabilistic models and early learning mechanisms

2011 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 129-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison Gopnik
Keyword(s):  
Conceptual Change ◽  
Probabilistic Models ◽  
Conceptual Structure ◽  
Early Learning ◽  
Learning Mechanisms ◽  
Core Cognition ◽  
Abstract Structure ◽  
Radical Discontinuity

AbstractWe need not propose, as Carey does, a radical discontinuity between core cognition, which is responsible for abstract structure, and language and “Quinian bootstrapping,” which are responsible for learning and conceptual change. From a probabilistic models view, conceptual structure and learning reflect the same principles, and they are both in place from the beginning.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document