scholarly journals Long‐term outcomes of open versus closed rectal defect after Transanal Endoscopic Microscopic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Altaf ◽  
Simone Slawik ◽  
Dana Sochorova ◽  
Sukhpreet Gahunia ◽  
Timothy Andrews ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Microscopic Surgery ◽  
Open Versus

Open Versus Minimally Invasive Resection of Gastric GIST: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Short- and Long-Term Outcomes

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 2941-2948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danielle A. Bischof ◽  
Yuhree Kim ◽  
Rebecca Dodson ◽  
M. Carolina Jimenez ◽  
Ramy Behman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Institutional Analysis ◽  
Gastric Gist ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short And Long Term ◽  
Open Versus

scholarly journals SP1.1.15Long-term Outcomes of Open Verses Closed Rectal Defect After Transanal Endoscopic Microscopic Surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kiran Altaf ◽  
Sukhpreet Gahunia ◽  
Simone Slawik ◽  
Timothy Andrews ◽  
Ashley Kehoe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Defect Group ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Defect Management ◽  
Patient Demographics ◽  
Microscopic Surgery ◽  
Defect Groups ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Pros And Cons

Abstract Aims Management of rectal defect after TEMS is a matter of debate. Data are lacking on the effect of these techniques on long term outcomes and continence of patients. We sought to analyse these in our patient cohort. Methods Patients who underwent TEMS between 2012 and 2019 were examined retrospectively from a prospectively maintained database. These were divided into two groups – open and closed rectal defect. Patient demographics were recorded and outcomes assessed including oncological staging, morbidity, mortality, length of stay and FISI scores. Results 170 matched patients were included, with 70 patients in the open and 100 in the closed rectal defect group. Short-term complications were 18.8% with no significant difference between the two groups. Most of the defects were well healed upon endoscopic follow-up; more unhealed/sinus formation was noticed in the open group (p = 0.01); more strictures were encountered in the closed group (p = 0.04). Overall, there was a significant difference in pre and post TEMS FISI scores in all three groups (p < 0.00001, p < 0.00001, p = 0.02). Comparing the open and closed defect groups, there was no difference in the functional outcome of patients in those who developed sinus or stricture but a significant difference in those with healed scar, with those in closed rectal defect group with worsening function (p = 0.02) Conclusion Both the approaches of rectal defect management are associated with pros and cons. Long term complications should be expected and actively followed up for. Patients should be thoroughly counselled about these and possible deterioration in continence post-TEMS

scholarly journals Conventional Open Versus Hybrid Arch Repair of Aortic Arch Disease: Early and Long-Term Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 1380-1388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Chel Joo ◽  
Young-Nam Youn ◽  
Jung-Hwan Kim ◽  
Seung Hyun Lee ◽  
Sak Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Aortic Arch ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Open Versus

Population-based long-term outcomes of open versus endovascular aortic repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms

2020 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 1867-1878.e8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Konrad Salata ◽  
Mohamad A. Hussain ◽  
Charles de Mestral ◽  
Elisa Greco ◽  
Hadeel Awartani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Endovascular Aortic Repair ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Aortic Repair ◽  
Abdominal Aortic ◽  
Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms ◽  
Open Versus

scholarly journals IP181. Early and Long-Term Outcomes of Open Versus Endovascular Repair Using Covered Stents for TASC C-D Aortoiliac Obstructive Lesions in Low-Risk and Young Patients∗

2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. e135-e136
Author(s):  
Michele Piazza ◽  
Francesco Squizzato ◽  
Riccardo Bozza ◽  
Sandro Lepidi ◽  
Mirko Menegolo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endovascular Repair ◽  
Young Patients ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Covered Stents ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Open Versus

scholarly journals Open versus percutaneous release for trigger digits: Reversal between short-term and long-term outcomes

2016 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 340-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chin-Jung Lin ◽  
Hui-Kuang Huang ◽  
Shih-Tien Wang ◽  
Yi-Chao Huang ◽  
Chien-Lin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Percutaneous Release ◽  
Open Versus

Traumatic Brain Injury: A Trauma Surgeon's Perspective

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 82-89
Author(s):  
Oscar D. Guillamondegui
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Multidisciplinary Approach ◽  
Trauma Team ◽  
The United States ◽  
Long Term Outcomes ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Injured Brain ◽  
The Moment

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a serious epidemic in the United States. It affects patients of all ages, race, and socioeconomic status (SES). The current care of these patients typically manifests after sequelae have been identified after discharge from the hospital, long after the inciting event. The purpose of this article is to introduce the concept of identification and management of the TBI patient from the moment of injury through long-term care as a multidisciplinary approach. By promoting an awareness of the issues that develop around the acutely injured brain and linking them to long-term outcomes, the trauma team can initiate care early to alter the effect on the patient, family, and community. Hopefully, by describing the care afforded at a trauma center and by a multidisciplinary team, we can bring a better understanding to the armamentarium of methods utilized to treat the difficult population of TBI patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document