Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic near‐total colectomy and ileo‐distal sigmoid anastomosis as a modification of total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for prophylactic surgery in patients with adenomatous polyposis syndromes: a comparative study

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 799-805
Author(s):  
C. C. Anele ◽  
S. Nachiappan ◽  
A. Sinha ◽  
V. Cuthill ◽  
J. T. Jenkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Ileorectal Anastomosis ◽  
Total Colectomy ◽  
Prophylactic Surgery ◽  
Adenomatous Polyposis ◽  
Safety And Efficacy ◽  
Polyposis Syndromes ◽  
Distal Sigmoid

Incidence of methacronous cancer after total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis or total proctocolectomy in classical FAP patients.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 646-646
Author(s):  
Samuel Aguiar ◽  
Paulo Roberto Stevanato ◽  
Fabio Oliveira Ferreira ◽  
Erika Maria Monteiro Santos ◽  
Ranyell Spencer Sobreira Batista ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Ileal Pouch ◽  
Ileorectal Anastomosis ◽  
Total Colectomy ◽  
Salvage Surgery ◽  
Dentate Line ◽  
Hereditary Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Total Proctocolectomy ◽  
Adenomatous Polyposis ◽  
Rectal Anastomosis

646 Background: Total proctocolectomy (TPC) with ileal pouch is considered the procedure of choice in classic familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP), but total colectomy (TC) with rectal sparing can be performed in selected cases. The objective of this study is to determine and compare the incidence of methacronous cancer in the remanescent rectum in patients submitted to TPC or TC. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of 55 patients operated beteween 1992 and 2011. Patients were identified from 34 FAP families, registered at the AC Camargo Hereditary Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients with attenuated FAP were excluded. The main endpoint was the occurence of cancer at the remanescent rectum. Results: Thirty seven patients were submitted to TPC and 18 to TC with ileo-rectal anastomosis. Among patients submitted to TPC, just one (2.7%) had methacronous adenocarcinoma just above the dentate line. Among patients submitted to TC with rectal sparing, 4 (22.2%) have another cancer at the remanescente rectum. This difference was statistically significant (0.035). The stage was initial in all cases, and all patients were submitted to salvage surgery. No deaths related to rectal cancer had occured. Conclusions: Surgical treatment of classical FAP still remains proctocolectomy with ileal pouch, whenever possible. Considering that methacronous cancer uses to be detected in initial stages, rectal sparing can be considered in very selected cases of classical FAP.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document