Abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. O13-O24 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Emile ◽  
H. A. Elfeki ◽  
M. Youssef ◽  
M. Farid ◽  
S. D. Wexner
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Internal Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Abdominal Rectopexy

Focus on abdominal rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse: meta-analysis of literature

2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Cadeddu ◽  
P. Sileri ◽  
M. Grande ◽  
E. De Luca ◽  
L. Franceschilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Abdominal Rectopexy

A Comparison of Open vs. Laparoscopic Abdominal Rectopexy for Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse: A Meta-Analysis

2005 ◽  
Vol 48 (10) ◽  
pp. 1930-1940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanjay Purkayastha ◽  
Paris Tekkis ◽  
Thanos Athanasiou ◽  
Omer Aziz ◽  
Paraskeva Paraskevas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Full Thickness ◽  
Abdominal Rectopexy

Sclerotherapy for rectal prolapse in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 54 (5) ◽  
pp. 1083-1088
Author(s):  
Graeme Charles Hintz ◽  
Vito Zhaoxin Zou ◽  
Robert Baird
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Robot-assisted or conventional laparoscoic rectopexy for rectal prolapse? Systematic review and meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. S153-S159 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Rondelli ◽  
W. Bugiantella ◽  
F. Villa ◽  
A. Sanguinetti ◽  
M. Boni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Robot Assisted

scholarly journals Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
H S Lobb ◽  
C C Kearsey ◽  
S Ahmed ◽  
R Rajaganeshan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Complete Rectal Prolapse ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Suture Rectopexy ◽  
Ventral Mesh Rectopexy ◽  
Mesh Rectopexy

Abstract Background This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare recurrence rates of rectal prolapse following ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) and suture rectopexy (SR). Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on the recurrence rates of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) or intussusception (IS) after SR and VMR. Results were pooled and procedures compared; a subgroup analysis was performed comparing patients with CRP and IS who underwent VMR using biological versus synthetic meshes. A meta-analysis of studies comparing SR and VMR was undertaken. The Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies score, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to assess the quality of studies. Results Twenty-two studies with 976 patients were included in the SR group and 31 studies with 1605 patients in the VMR group; among these studies, five were eligible for meta-analysis. Overall, in patients with CRP, the recurrence rate was 8.6 per cent after SR and 3.7 per cent after VMR (P < 0.001). However, in patients with IS treated using VMR, the recurrence rate was 9.7 per cent. Recurrence rates after VMR did not differ with use of biological or synthetic mesh in patients treated for CRP (4.1 versus 3.6 per cent; P = 0.789) and or IS (11.4 versus 11.0 per cent; P = 0.902). Results from the meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity, and the difference in recurrence rates between SR and VMR groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.76). Conclusion Although the systematic review showed a higher recurrence rate after SR than VMR for treatment of CRP, this result was not confirmed by meta-analysis. Therefore, robust RCTs comparing SR and biological VMR are required.

The effects of low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA on biomarkers of inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Inflammation Markers ◽  
Pufa Supplementation ◽  
Long Chain

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document