The role of faecal diversion in low rectal cancer: a review of 1791 patients having rectal resection with anastomosis for cancer, with and without a proximal stoma

2013 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e309-e316 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Nurkin ◽  
V. R. Kakarla ◽  
D. E. Ruiz ◽  
W. G. Cance ◽  
H. I. Tiszenkel
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Faecal Diversion

OUTCOME OF SPHINCTER PRESERVING RECTAL RESECTION FOR LOW RECTAL CANCER

2017 ◽  
pp. 36-40
Author(s):  
Vinh Quy Truong ◽  
Anh Vu Pham ◽  
Quang Thuu Le
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Low Anterior Resection ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Anal Verge ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Central Hospital ◽  
Mesorectal Excision ◽  
Pull Through ◽  
Stage T1

Purpose: To evaluate the functional outcome of sphincter-preserving rectal resection for low rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: From April 2009 to January 2016, there are 52 patients who underwent sphincter-preserving rectal resection with total mesorectal excision with low rectal cancer (<6cm from the anal verge) at Hue Central Hospital, Hue, Vietnam. Results: the average age 62.7 ± 12.8, the distance of tumor from anal verge include four group (≤ 3cm 1.9%; 3 to ≤ 4cm 17.3%; 4 to ≤ 5cm 34.6%; > 5 cm). T stage T1/ T2/T3: 1.9%/28.8%/69.2%. The following time is 33.8 ± 18.9 month. Overall recurrence was 13/18(27.1%), local recurrence was 5 (10.4%). Total survival was 40.5 ± 2.9 month. Technique: intersphincteric preservation 14 (26.9%), low anterior resection 17 (32.7%) and pull-through procedure 21 (40.4%). The distance of anatomosis from anal verge: from 1 to ≤ 2 cm:14 (26.9%); from 2 to ≤ 3cm: 21 (40.4%); from 3 to ≤ 4 cm: 17 (32.7%). Bowels movement of 3 month: 4.7 ± 3.2 and 12th month: 2.7 ± 1.6 (p< 0.01). Conclusions: Sphincterpreserving rectal resection using may provide a good continence and oncologic safety. The patients are acceptable with the results of functional outcomes. Key words: Low rectal cancer, sphincter-preserving

scholarly journals Role of diversion ileostomy in low rectal cancer: A randomized controlled trial

2014 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 945-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mukhtar Thoker ◽  
Imtiaz Wani ◽  
Fazl Q. Parray ◽  
Nawab Khan ◽  
Shabeer A. Mir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled

697 Local recurrence after total rectal resection, mesorectum excision and coloendoanal anastomosis for treatment of low rectal cancer

1995 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. S145
Author(s):  
E. Leo ◽  
F. Belli ◽  
S. Andreola ◽  
M.T. Baldini ◽  
G. Gallina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer

The role of locoregional resection with TEM to treat small nonadvanced low rectal cancer: the key point to obtaining good results

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 584-585
Author(s):  
Giovanni Lezoche ◽  
Alessandro M. Paganini ◽  
Emanuele Lezoche
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer

Transanal Inside-Out Rectal Resection for Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 375-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yung-Sung Yeh ◽  
Ming-Jenn Chen ◽  
Hsiang-Lin Tsai ◽  
Ming-Yii Huang ◽  
Chao-Wen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer ◽  
Inside Out

Total rectal resection, mesorectum excision, and coloendoanal anastomosis: A therapeutic option for the treatment of low rectal cancer

1996 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 453
Author(s):  
Ermanno Leo ◽  
Filiberto Belli ◽  
Salvatore Andreola ◽  
Maria Teresa Baldini ◽  
Gian Francesco Gallino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Resection ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Low Rectal Cancer
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document