scholarly journals Allergic contact dermatitis caused by polyhexamethylene biguanide may contribute to work‐related hand eczema

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michaela Kolodziej ◽  
Alexander Kiewert ◽  
Christoph Skudlik ◽  
Richard Brans
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Allergic Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Hand Eczema ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Polyhexamethylene Biguanide ◽  
Allergic Contact

Allergic contact dermatitis caused by prednicarbate presenting as chronic hand eczema

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
María-Mercedes Otero-Rivas ◽  
Inmaculada Ruiz-González ◽  
Alicia Pérez-Bustillo ◽  
Manuel-Ángel Rodríguez-Prieto
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Allergic Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Hand Eczema ◽  
Chronic Hand Eczema ◽  
Allergic Contact

scholarly journals Common Contact Sensitizers among Patients with Hand Eczema: A Multicenter-Study in Nepal

2016 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
S. Bhattarai ◽  
A. Rijal ◽  
S. Agrawal
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Allergic Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Patch Test ◽  
Patch Testing ◽  
Potassium Dichromate ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Hand Eczema ◽  
Contact Allergens ◽  
Allergic Contact

Introduction: Allergic contact dermatitis in Nepal is not an uncommon disorder. Patch testing is a well established method of diagnosing allergic contact dermatitis. Patients with contact dermatitis are well known to have impaired quality of life which often leads to frequent dermatological consultations.Objective: Lack of data from Nepal has prompted us to undertake this study with the aims to know the frequency of allergic contact dermatitis and the commonest contact allergens among the patients with Hand eczema attending the out-patient department of dermatology, B.P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences and Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital.Material and Methods: A total of 256 patients were included in the study. Out of them 195 with hand eczema agreed to participate and undergo patch testing. The antigens used included the Indian standard series of patch test allergens approved by Contact and Occupational Dermatoses Forum of India.Results: Hundred and ten cases (56.4%) were patch test positive (PTP) at 48 as well as 96 hours to at least one allergen. PTP was seen more commonly in females. The most common allergen in females was nickel sulphate followed by cobalt chloride, gentamicin and mercapto mix while males were positive to potassium dichromate, followed by epoxy resin, fragrance mix and nickel sulphate.Conclusion: Patch testing has proved a useful tool for the detection of allergic contact dermatitis and for identification of contact allergens. When positive reactions correlate with environmental exposure the test usually assists the physician in establishing the cause of dermatitis, hence treating the patients and improving their quality of life.Nepal Journal of Dermatology, Venereology & Leprology, Vol.14(1) 2016, pp.14-17

scholarly journals Allergic contact dermatitis among construction workers detected in a clinic that did not specialize in occupational dermatitis

2012 ◽  
Vol 87 (4) ◽  
pp. 567-571 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosana Lazzarini ◽  
Ida Alzira Gomes Duarte ◽  
Juliana Mayumi Sumita ◽  
Rogério Minnicelli
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Allergic Contact Dermatitis ◽  
High Frequency ◽  
Construction Workers ◽  
Occupational Dermatitis ◽  
Patch Tests ◽  
Work Related ◽  
Primary Contact ◽  
The Common ◽  
Allergic Contact

BACKGROUND: Contact dermatitis is one of the common work-related dermatoses. Among bricklayers, cement can cause both allergic contact dermatitis and primary contact irritative dermatitis. The personal protective equipment (rubber gloves) may favor the development of allergic contact dermatitis. OBJECTIVES: 1) to evaluate the frequency of allergic contact dermatitis among construction workers between January 2005 and December 2009; 2) to determine the major sensitizing agents in the study group; and 3) to compare the data obtained from the construction workers to that of a group of patients who were not construction workers. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patch tests. Patients were separated into two groups: 1) bricklayers and 2) non-bricklayers. RESULTS: Of the 525 patch tests analyzed, 466 (90%) were from non-bricklayers and 53 (10%) from bricklayers. The hands were affected in 38 (61%) of them. 13 patients (24%) had irritative contact dermatitis and 40 (76%) had allergic contact dermatitis. The group of construction workers had a high frequency of sensitization to cement, and 29 (54.7%) had sensitization to rubber vulcanizing agents. 23 patients (43.4%) had sensitization to both cement and rubber. CONCLUSIONS: Among the bricklayers the presence of allergic contact dermatitis to rubber and cement in the same patient is common and demonstrates the importance of the patch test.

scholarly journals Mixed occupational and iatrogenic allergic contact dermatitis in a hairdresser

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (7) ◽  
pp. 523-526
Author(s):  
J E Koblinski ◽  
D Hamann
Keyword(s):  
Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Allergic Contact Dermatitis ◽  
Contact Allergy ◽  
Delayed Diagnosis ◽  
Occupational Exposures ◽  
Hand Eczema ◽  
Topical Steroids ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Allergic Contact

Summary Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a common occupational disease. Hairdressers and beauticians are at increased risk of occupational chronic hand eczema. We present a case of mixed occupational, non-occupational and iatrogenic ACD in a hairdresser which illustrates that delayed diagnosis can result in high morbidity, and unnecessary treatment and cost. A hairdresser with chronic hand and facial eczema failed medical management with topical steroids and dupilumab. Patch testing revealed contact allergy to multiple occupational exposures, home exposures and topical medicaments.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document