scholarly journals Barriers and facilitators in the implementation of recommendations for hand eczema prevention among healthcare workers

2015 ◽  
Vol 72 (5) ◽  
pp. 325-336 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther W. C. van der Meer ◽  
Joost W. J. van der Gulden ◽  
Diana van Dongen ◽  
Cécile R. L. Boot ◽  
Johannes R. Anema
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-102
Author(s):  
Anca E. Chiriac ◽  
Doina Azoicai ◽  
Uwe Wollina ◽  
Anca Chiriac ◽  
Cristian Podoleanu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Hand eczema, in time of COVID-19, is one of the most frequently diagnosed skin disorders in nurses. In this study, we sought to investigate whether smoking could be an additional risk factor for hand eczema in nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: Using a questionnaire about smoking details and hand eczema, we conducted a study among nurses involved in the frontline management of COVID-19 patients. A total of 1,000 questionnaires were sent out. The questionnaires were anonymous and based on self-reported answers, with no clinical examination or medical data evaluation. All nurses enrolled in the study were women, working in shifts for the last three months since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: Two-hundred forty-seven questionnaires were accepted for the study, after eliminating non-responders and nurses without hand eczema. The majority of nurses denied smoking (87.85%) in the past and at the moment of the study. Statistics related to years of smoking and occurrence of hand eczema showed no increase in the number of cases in correlation with the number of years of smoking. Similarly, a random distribution of cases of hand eczema was observed when compared to the number of cigarettes per day. Conclusion: Our data does not support the hypothesis that smoking is an independent risk factor for the development of occupational hand eczema during the COVID-19 pandemic.


BMJ ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 345 (dec12 1) ◽  
pp. e8370-e8370 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Thomas ◽  
J. English

2012 ◽  
Vol 66 (5) ◽  
pp. 247-253 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina S. Ibler ◽  
Gregor B. E. Jemec ◽  
Tove Agner

2020 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 422-423
Author(s):  
Yasemin Erdem ◽  
Ilknur K. Altunay ◽  
Aslı Aksu Çerman ◽  
Sena Inal ◽  
Ece Ugurer ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (24) ◽  
pp. 1664-1664
Author(s):  
Danqi Huang ◽  
Zengqi Tang ◽  
Xiaonan Qiu ◽  
Xiuting Liu ◽  
Zhixuan Guo ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Tu ◽  
Hayley Elling ◽  
Nikki Behnke ◽  
Jennifer Mmodzi Tseka ◽  
Holystone Kafanikhale ◽  
...  

Abstract The burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) is greater in low- and middle-income countries than in high-income countries. Inadequate environmental health (EH) conditions and work systems contribute to HAIs in countries like Malawi. We collected qualitative data from 48 semi-structured interviews with healthcare workers (HCWs) from 45 healthcare facilities (HCFs) across Malawi and conducted a thematic analysis. The facilitators of infection prevention and control (IPC) practices in HCFs included disinfection practices, patient education, and waste management procedures. HCWs reported barriers such as lack of IPC training, bottlenecks in maintenance and repair, hand hygiene infrastructure, water provision, and personal protective equipment. This is one of the most comprehensive assessments to date of IPC practices and environmental conditions in Malawian HCFs in relation to HCWs. A comprehensive understanding of barriers and facilitators to IPC practices will help decision-makers craft better interventions and policies to support HCWs to protect themselves and their patients.


Author(s):  
Holly Blake ◽  
Mehmet Yildirim ◽  
Ben Wood ◽  
Steph Knowles ◽  
Helen Mancini ◽  
...  

Supported Wellbeing Centres have been set up in UK hospital trusts in effort to mitigate the psychological impact of COVID-19 on healthcare workers, although the extent to which these are utilised and the barriers and facilitators to access are not known. The aim of the study was to determine facility usage and gather insight into employee wellbeing and the views of employees towards this provision. The study included i) 17-week service use monitoring, ii) employee online survey with measures of wellbeing, job stressfulness, presenteeism, turnover intentions, job satisfaction, and work engagement as well as barriers and facilitators to accessing the Wellbeing Centres. Over 17 weeks, 14,934 facility visits were recorded across two sites (peak attendance in single week n= 2,605). Facilities were highly valued, but the service model was resource intensive with 134 wellbeing buddies supporting the centres in pairs. 819 hospital employees completed an online survey (88% female; 37.7% working in COVID-19 high risk areas; 52.4% frontline workers; 55.2% had accessed a wellbeing centre). There was moderate-to-high job stress (62.9%), low wellbeing (26.1%), presenteeism (68%) and intentions to leave (31.6%). Wellbeing was higher in those that accessed a wellbeing centre. Work engagement and job satisfaction were high. Healthcare organisations are urged to mobilise access to high-quality rest spaces and Psychological First Aid, but this should be localised and diversified. Strategies to address presenteeism and staff retention should be prioritised, and high dedication of healthcare workers should be recognised.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document