scholarly journals Effects of national forest-management regimes on unprotected forests of the Himalaya

2017 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 1271-1282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jodi S. Brandt ◽  
Teri Allendorf ◽  
Volker Radeloff ◽  
Jeremy Brooks
Keyword(s):  
Forest Management ◽  
National Forest ◽  
National Forest Management ◽  
Management Regimes ◽  
The Himalaya

scholarly journals Fuelwood territorialities: <i>Chantier d'Aménagement Forestier</i> and the reproduction of “political forests” in Burkina Faso

2018 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muriel Côte ◽  
Denis Gautier
Keyword(s):  
Forest Management ◽  
Burkina Faso ◽  
Management Programme ◽  
Forest Governance ◽  
National Forest ◽  
Resource Model ◽  
National Forest Management ◽  
International Donors ◽  
State Actors

Abstract. This paper investigates the endurance of a national forest management programme in Burkina Faso called Chantier d'Aménagement Forestier (CAF), which focuses on the participatory sustainable production of fuelwood and is widely supported by international donors despite evidence of its shortcomings. We analyse the surprising persistence of the CAF model as a case of the territorialisation of state power through the reproduction of “political forests” – drawing on the work of Peluso and Vandergeest (2001, 2011). Analysing some the shortcomings and incoherencies of the model, we bring to light the role of non-state actors in the reproduction of the CAF as a “political forest”. We show that informal regulatory arrangements have emerged between state and non-state actors, namely merchants and customary authorities, over the production of fuelwood. We call these arrangements “fuelwood territorialities” because they have contributed to keeping the CAF's resource model unquestioned. With fuelwood territorialities, we draw attention to the role of non-state actors in the reproduction of “political forests”, that is, the process of state territorialisation through forest governance. This analysis helps clarify how certain areas, such as the CAFs, keep being officially represented as “forest” even though they are dominated by a patchwork of fields, fallows, and savannahs and do not have the ecological characteristics of one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document