scholarly journals UK Head and neck cancer surgical capacity during the second wave of the COVID—19 pandemic: Have we learned the lessons? COVIDSurg collaborative

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Shaw ◽  
Andrew G Schache ◽  
Michael Wing Sung Ho ◽  
Stuart C Winter ◽  
James Glasbey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Surgical Capacity ◽  
Second Wave

scholarly journals UK Head and neck cancer surgical capacity during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic -- have we learned the lessons? COVIDSurg collaborative

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
richard shaw ◽  
Paul Nankivell ◽  
Stuart Winter ◽  
Andrew Schache ◽  
Michael Ho
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Cancer Surgery ◽  
Surgical Capacity ◽  
Specialist Service ◽  
Tertiary Hospitals ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Second Wave

Objectives - The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in surgical capacity for head and neck cancer in the UK between the first wave (March-June 2020) and the current wave (Jan-Feb 2021) of the COVID-19 pandemic. Design – REDcap online based survey of hospital capacity. Setting - UK secondary and tertiary hospitals providing head and neck cancer surgery. Participants – One representative per hospital was asked to report the capacity for head and neck cancer surgery in that institution. Main outcome measures – The principal measures of interests were new patient referrals, capacity in outpatients, theatres and critical care; therapeutic compromises constituting delay to surgery, de-escalated surgery and therapeutic migration to non-surgical primary modality. Results – Data was returned from approximately 95% of UK hospitals with a head and neck cancer surgery specialist service. 50% of UK head and neck cancer patients requiring surgery have significantly compromised treatments during the second wave: 28% delayed, 10% have received radiotherapy based treatment instead of surgery and 12% have received de-escalated surgery. Surgical capacity has been more severely constrained in the second wave (58% of pre-pandemic level) compared with the first wave (62%) despite the time to prepare. Conclusions - Some hospitals are overwhelmed by COVID-19 and unable to offer essential cancer surgery, but all have neighbouring hospitals in their region retaining good (or even normal) capacity. It is noteworthy that very few patients have been appropriately re-directed away from the hospitals most constrained by their burden of COVID-19. The paucity of an effective central or regional strategic response to this evident mismatch between demand and surgical capacity is to the detriment of our head and neck cancer patients.

scholarly journals Uniform infection screening allowed safe head and neck surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Japan

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiko Ito ◽  
Kenya Kobayashi ◽  
Mika Shiotsuka ◽  
Tetsufumi Sato ◽  
Go Omura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Epidemic Area ◽  
Screening Protocol ◽  
Second Wave

Abstract Background The purpose of this study was to determine whether a uniform infection screening protocol could be used to safely perform head and neck cancer surgery during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic and clarify how surgical treatment changed compared with the pre-pandemic period. Materials and methods During the unprecedented coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic in Tokyo, we continued providing head and neck cancer care, guided by our own uniform screening protocol. In this study, medical records of 208 patients with head and neck malignancy, who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital during the first and second wave of pandemic for each 2-month period (first wave: 30 March 2020–30 May 2020, second wave: 14 July 2020–14 September 2020) and the 2-month pre-pandemic period (30 October 2019–30 December 2020), were analysed. Results A total of 133 patients were admitted for surgical treatment and all, except six patients with emergency tracheostomy, were screened according to the protocol. As a result, all 127 patients received surgical treatment as planned, and all 1247 medical staff members involved in the surgeries were uninfected by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. During the first wave of pandemic, 20% reduction of head and neck surgery was requited; however, restrictions of surgery were not necessary during the second wave. Surgical procedure, length of hospitalization, postoperative complications and number of medical staff were unchanged compared with pre-pandemic period. Conclusion Our data indicate that continuation of head and neck anticancer surgical treatment in an epidemic area during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic were safe and feasible, if adequate and strict preventive measures are vigorously and successfully carried out.

Nutritional status as a prognostic factor in advanced head and neck cancer

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 376-376
Author(s):  
Quak ◽  
Van Bokhorst ◽  
Klop ◽  
Van Leeuwen ◽  
Snow
Keyword(s):  
Head And Neck Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factor ◽  
Nutritional Status ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Neck Cancer ◽  
Advanced Head
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document