scholarly journals Influence of implant dimensions and position on primary and secondary stability – A prospective clinical study in mandible using resonance frequency analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (S19) ◽  
pp. 522-522
Author(s):  
Carlo Rengo ◽  
Antonio Nappo ◽  
Antonino Fiorino ◽  
Giuseppe Pantaleo ◽  
Gianrico Spagnuolo ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 245-252
Author(s):  
Sayali Prashant Pradhan ◽  
Supriya Nambiar ◽  
Shravan Shetty ◽  
Siddarth Shetty ◽  
Nidhin Philip Jose

Objectives: The objectives of the study were to determine the association of gingival biotype and secondary stability of orthodontic mini-implants using resonance frequency analysis. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients, each receiving two mini-implants, were divided into two groups; thick and thin gingival biotype based on the thickness of gingiva before mini-implant placement. Implant stability was assessed at the time of placement; at the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th month by resonance frequency analysis. Peri-implant soft-tissue conditions were also examined at each month till 4 months interval using periodontal indices. Results: Thick and thin gingival biotype groups showed statistically different implant stability quotient (ISQ). Mini-implants showing signs of failure consistently displayed lesser ISQ. Statistically significant difference was observed in the scores of peri-implant indices of failure and no failure group of mini-implants. Conclusion: Mini-implants in thin gingival biotype are more susceptible to failure and peri-implantitis compared to thick gingival biotype. Longitudinal assessment of mini-implant stability may help predict failure so as to avoid long duration and cost of orthodontic treatment.


Author(s):  
María Guerrero-González ◽  
Francesca Monticelli ◽  
David Saura García-Martín ◽  
Mariano Herrero-Climent ◽  
Blanca Ríos-Carrasco ◽  
...  

Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) requires abutment disconnection to monitor implant stability. To overcome this limitation, an experimental transepithelial abutment was designed to allow a SmartPeg to be screwed onto it, in order to determine the prototype abutments repeatability and reproducibility using Osstell ISQ and to assess whether implant length and diameter have an influence on the reliability of these measurements. RFA was conducted with a SmartPeg screwed directly into the implant and onto experimental abutments of different heights of 2, 3.5 and 5 mm. A total of 32 patients (116 implants) were tested. RFA measurements were taken twice for each group from mesial, distal, buccal and palatal/lingual surfaces. Mean values and SD were calculated and Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) (p < 0.05, IC 95%). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) mean values were 72.581 measured directly to implant and 72.899 (2 mm), 72.391 (3.5 mm) and 71.458 (5 mm) measured from the prototypes. ICC between measurements made directly to implant and through 2-, 3.5- and 5-mm abutments were 0.908, 0.919 and 0.939, respectively. RFA values registered through the experimental transepithelial abutments achieved a high reliability. Neither the implant length nor the diameter had any influence on the measurements’ reliability.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document