scholarly journals Digital workflow used to fabricate implant-supported three-unit fixed dental prosthesis

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 358-358
Keyword(s):  
Dental Prosthesis ◽  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Fixed Dental Prosthesis

scholarly journals A Comparative Study of the Fitness and Trueness of a Three-Unit Fixed Dental Prosthesis Fabricated Using Two Digital Workflows

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (14) ◽  
pp. 2778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daehee Jang ◽  
Keunbada Son ◽  
Kyu-bok Lee
Keyword(s):  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Dental Prosthesis ◽  
Test Model ◽  
3D Analysis ◽  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Open Type ◽  
Fixed Dental Prosthesis ◽  
Closed Type ◽  
Computer Aided ◽  
Internal Fit

The purpose of this study was to measure and correlate the fitness and trueness of a 3-unit fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) fabricated using two digital workflows. The 3-unit FDPs were fabricated using two digital workflows (N = 15). The digital workflows were divided into chairside (closed type) and in-lab (open type) groups. The scanning, computer-aided design (CAD), and computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) processes were conducted with 3shape E1 scanner, exocad CAD software, and DDS EZIS HM, respectively, in the in-lab group; and with CEREC omnicam intraoral scanner, CEREC CAD software, and CEREC MC XL, respectively, in the chairside group. The fitness of the fabricated 3-unit FDPs was evaluated by scanning the silicone replica of the cement space and analyzing the thickness of the silicone replica in the three-dimensional (3D) inspection software (Geomagic control X). The trueness of the milling unit was analyzed by 3D analysis of the CAD reference model, which is the design file of the 3-unit FDP, and the CAD test model, which is the scanned file of the 3-unit FDP. In the statistical analysis, comparison of the two groups was conducted by Mann–Whitney U test, and the correlation between the fitness and trueness was conducted by Pearson correlation test (α = 0.05). The marginal and internal fit were significantly lower in the in-lab group at all measurement positions (p < 0.001). The trueness of the milling unit was significantly higher in the in-lab group compared to the chairside group (p < 0.001). There was a positive correlation between the trueness and internal fit (correlation coefficient = 0.621) in the in-lab group (p = 0.013). The use of appropriate equipment in an in-lab (open type) digital workflow enables a better fabrication of 3-unit FDPs than a chairside (closed type) digital workflow, and poor trueness on the inner surface of the crown adversely affects the internal fit.

scholarly journals Technical and Biological Complications of Screw-Retained (CAD/CAM) Monolithic and Partial Veneer Zirconia for Fixed Dental Prostheses on Posterior Implants Using a Digital Workflow: A 3-Year Cross-Sectional Retrospective Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Paolo De Angelis ◽  
Giulio Gasparini ◽  
Francesca Camodeca ◽  
Silvio De Angelis ◽  
Margherita Giorgia Liguori ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Digital Workflow ◽  
Fixed Dental Prosthesis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Cad Cam ◽  
Study Population ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Technical Complication ◽  
Ceramic Restorations

Objective. The introduction of CAD/CAM and the development of zirconia-based restorations have allowed clinicians to use less expensive materials and faster manufacturing procedures. The purpose of the study was to analyze the differences, in terms of mechanical and biological complication, in multiunit zirconia fixed dental prosthesis (FPDs) on posterior implants produced using a digital workflow. Method and Materials. This study was a retrospective investigation, and patients treated with screw-retained monolithic or partial veneer FPDs on dental implants were selected. Periapical radiographs were taken at baseline and at the 3-year follow-up. Complications were recorded and classified as technical and biological ones. Results. The study population included 25 patients. The occlusal and interproximal corrections were not clinically significant. In the study sample, the survival rate and success rate of the FPDs after 3 years were 100% and 96%, respectively. One implant failed immediately after placement. Conclusion. Monolithic zirconia FPDs and partial veneer FPDs showed a 100% survival rate, presenting an interesting alternative to metal ceramic restorations. The partial veneer FPDs had a higher technical complication rate than the monolithic FPDs; however, no statistically significant difference was found.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document