scholarly journals A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia‐ceramic and metal‐ceramic single crowns

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (S16) ◽  
pp. 199-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarni E Pjetursson ◽  
Nicola A Valente ◽  
Malin Strasding ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
Shiming Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Metal Ceramic ◽  
Single Crowns

scholarly journals A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia‐ceramic and metal‐ceramic multiple‐unit fixed dental prostheses

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (S16) ◽  
pp. 184-198 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Sailer ◽  
Malin Strasding ◽  
Nicola Alberto Valente ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
Shiming Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Zirconia Ceramic ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
Metal Ceramic ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Multiple Unit

scholarly journals All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part I: Single crowns (SCs)

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 603-623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irena Sailer ◽  
Nikolay Alexandrovich Makarov ◽  
Daniel Stefan Thoma ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Metal Ceramic ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Single Crowns

scholarly journals A systematic review and meta‐analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all‐ceramic implant‐supported single crowns

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (S21) ◽  
pp. 254-288
Author(s):  
Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson ◽  
Irena Sailer ◽  
Andrey Latyshev ◽  
Kerstin Rabel ◽  
Ralf‐Joachim Kohal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Single Crowns ◽  
Ceramic Implant

scholarly journals All-ceramic or metal-ceramic tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs)? A systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Part II: Multiple-unit FDPs

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 624-639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bjarni Elvar Pjetursson ◽  
Irena Sailer ◽  
Nikolay Alexandrovich Makarov ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
Daniel Stefan Thoma
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Dental Prostheses ◽  
All Ceramic ◽  
Metal Ceramic ◽  
Fixed Dental Prostheses ◽  
Multiple Unit

scholarly journals Influence of testing parameters on the load-bearing capacity of prosthetic materials used for fixed dental prosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 470
Author(s):  
Mutlu Özcan ◽  
Julia Höhn ◽  
Dayanne Duarte Moura ◽  
Rodrigo Souza
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Bearing Capacity ◽  
Fracture Strength ◽  
Composite Resin ◽  
Load Bearing Capacity ◽  
Load Bearing ◽  
Metal Ceramic ◽  
Static Fracture ◽  
Materials Used ◽  
Single Crowns

<p>The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to assess static fracture strength tests applied for FDPs and analyze the impact of periodontal ligament (PDL) simulation on the fracture strength. Original scientific papers published in MEDLINE (PubMed) database between 01/01/1981 and 01/06/2010 were included in this systematic review. Data were analyzed considering the test method (static loading), material type (metal-ceramic-MC, oxide all-ceramic-AC, fiber reinforced composite resin-FRC, composite resin-C), PDL (without or with) and restoration type (single crowns, 3-unit, 4-unit, inlay-retained and cantilever FDPs). The selection process resulted in the 72 studies. In total, 377 subgroups revealed results from static load-bearing capacity of different materials. Fourteen metal-ceramic, 190 AC, 121 FRC, 45 C resin groups were identified as subgroups. Slightly decreased results were observed with the presence of PDL for single crowns (without PDL=1117±215 N; with PDL=876±69 N), 3-unit FDPs (without PDL=791±116 N; with PDL=675±91 N) made of AC, 3-unit FDP (without PDL=1244±270 N; with PDL=930±76 N) and inlay-retained FDP (without PDL=848±104 N; with PDL=820±91 N) made of FRC and 4-unit FDPs (without PDL=548±26 N; with PDL=393±67 N) made of C. Overall, for single crowns, fracture strength of FRC was higher than that of AC and MC; for 3-unit FDPs FRC=C&gt;AC=MC; for 4-unit FDPs AC&gt;FRC&gt;C and for inlay-retained FDPs, FRC=AC. An inclination for decreased static fracture strength could be observed with the simulation of PDL but due to insufficient data this could not be generalized for all materials used for FDPs.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document