scholarly journals Effects of lateral bone augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 18-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignacio Sanz-Sánchez ◽  
Ana Carrillo de Albornoz ◽  
Elena Figuero ◽  
Frank Schwarz ◽  
Ronald Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bone Augmentation

scholarly journals Bone augmentation using autogenous bone versus biomaterial in the posterior region of atrophic mandibles: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 76 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecília Alves de Sousa ◽  
Cleidiel Aparecido Araújo Lemos ◽  
Joel Ferreira Santiago-Júnior ◽  
Leonardo Perez Faverani ◽  
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Posterior Region ◽  
Autogenous Bone ◽  
Bone Augmentation

scholarly journals Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation prior to implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 287-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadja Naenni ◽  
Hyun-Chang Lim ◽  
Spyridon N. Papageorgiou ◽  
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals Efficacy of lateral bone augmentation performed simultaneously with dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 46 ◽  
pp. 257-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Thoma ◽  
Stefan P. Bienz ◽  
Elena Figuero ◽  
Ronald E. Jung ◽  
Ignacio Sanz-Martín
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Implant Placement

scholarly journals Synthetic Blocks for Bone Regeneration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (17) ◽  
pp. 4221 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tumedei ◽  
Savadori ◽  
Del Fabbro
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Animal Models ◽  
Bone Formation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
In Vivo Studies ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
New Bone Formation ◽  
Bias Assessment

This systematic review is aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of synthetic block materials for bone augmentation in preclinical in vivo studies. An electronic search was performed on Pubmed, Scopus, EMBASE. Articles selected underwent risk-of-bias assessment. The outcomes were: new bone formation and residual graft with histomorphometry, radiographic bone density, soft tissue parameters, complications. Meta-analysis was performed to compare new bone formation in test (synthetic blocks) vs. control group (autogenous blocks or spontaneous healing). The search yielded 214 articles. After screening, 39 studies were included, all performed on animal models: rabbits (n = 18 studies), dogs (n = 4), rats (n = 7), minipigs (n = 4), goats (n = 4), and sheep (n = 2). The meta-analysis on rabbit studies showed significantly higher new bone formation for synthetic blocks with respect to autogenous blocks both at four-week (mean difference (MD): 5.91%, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 1.04, 10.79%, p = 0.02) and at eight-week healing (MD: 4.44%, 95% CI: 0.71, 8.17%, p = 0.02). Other animal models evidenced a trend for better outcomes with synthetic blocks, though only based on qualitative analysis. Synthetic blocks may represent a viable resource in bone regenerative surgery for achieving new bone formation. Differences in the animal models, the design of included studies, and the bone defects treated should be considered when generalizing the results. Clinical studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of synthetic blocks in bone augmentation procedures.

Vertical Ridge Gain with Various Bone Augmentation Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 421-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Hasan Hameed ◽  
Meisha Gul ◽  
Robia Ghafoor ◽  
Farhan Raza Khan
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bone Augmentation ◽  
Augmentation Techniques

The effects of low-ratio n-6/n-3 PUFA on biomarkers of inflammation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yali Wei ◽  
Yan Meng ◽  
Na Li ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Liyong Chen
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Fatty Acid ◽  
Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Chain Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid ◽  
Inflammation Markers ◽  
Pufa Supplementation ◽  
Long Chain

The purpose of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine if low-ratio n-6/n-3 long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) supplementation affects serum inflammation markers based on current studies.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document