scholarly journals Effects of soft tissue augmentation procedures on peri-implant health or disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 32-49 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Thoma ◽  
Nadja Naenni ◽  
Elena Figuero ◽  
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle ◽  
Frank Schwarz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Tissue Augmentation

Linear and profilometric changes of the mucosa following soft tissue augmentation in the zone of aesthetic priority: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (S21) ◽  
pp. 138-156
Author(s):  
Gerry M. Raghoebar ◽  
Anke Korfage ◽  
Henny J. A. Meijer ◽  
Barzi Gareb ◽  
Arjan Vissink ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Tissue Augmentation

Soft tissue augmentation around osseointegrated and uncovered dental implants: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renzo G. Bassetti ◽  
Alexandra Stähli ◽  
Mario A. Bassetti ◽  
Anton Sculean
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Tissue Augmentation

scholarly journals A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 ◽  
pp. 146-165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Thoma ◽  
Goran I. Benić ◽  
Marcel Zwahlen ◽  
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle ◽  
Ronald E. Jung
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Augmentation Techniques

Soft tissue augmentation procedures at second-stage surgery: a systematic review

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1369-1387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renzo G. Bassetti ◽  
Alexandra Stähli ◽  
Mario A. Bassetti ◽  
Anton Sculean
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Second Stage ◽  
Tissue Augmentation

scholarly journals Collagen Matrix vs. Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft for Soft Tissue Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1810
Author(s):  
Cristina Vallecillo ◽  
Manuel Toledano-Osorio ◽  
Marta Vallecillo-Rivas ◽  
Manuel Toledano ◽  
Alberto Rodriguez-Archilla ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Connective Tissue ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Soft Tissue Augmentation ◽  
Total Width ◽  
Collagen Matrices ◽  
Connective Tissue Graft ◽  
Tissue Graft

Soft tissues have been shown to be critical for the maintenance of both teeth and implants. Currently, regenerative soft tissue techniques propose the use of collagen matrices, which can avoid the drawbacks derived from the obtainment of autogenous tissue graft. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to ascertain the efficacy of collagen matrices (CM) compared to autogenous connective tissue graft (CTG) to improve soft tissue dimensions. An electronic and manual literature searches were performed to identify randomized clinical trials (RCT) or controlled clinical trials (CCT) that compared CTG and CM. Pooled data of width of keratinized tissue (KT) and mucosal thickness (MT) were collected and weighted means were calculated. Heterogeneity was determined using Higgins (I2). If I2 > 50% a random-effects model was applied. Nineteen studies were included based on the eligibility criteria. When using CTG a higher MT gain (0.32 mm, ranging from 0.49 to 0.16 mm) was obtained than when employing CM. Similar result was obtained for the width of KT gain, that was 0.46 mm higher (ranging from 0.89 to 0.02 mm) when employing CTG. However, it can be stated that, although autogenous CTG achieves higher values, CM are an effective alternative in terms of total width of KT and MT gain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document