Guided bone regeneration with particulate vs. block xenogenic bone substitutes: a pilot cone beam computed tomographic investigation

2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (11) ◽  
pp. e262-e270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran I. Benic ◽  
Daniel S. Thoma ◽  
Ronald E. Jung ◽  
Ignacio Sanz-Martin ◽  
Silvan Unger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Substitutes ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Xenogenic Bone

scholarly journals Guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with particulated and block xenogenic bone substitutes

2015 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 567-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goran I. Benic ◽  
Daniel S. Thoma ◽  
Fernando Muñoz ◽  
Ignacio Sanz Martin ◽  
Ronald E. Jung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Substitutes ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Xenogenic Bone

scholarly journals Guided bone regeneration using resorbable membrane and different bone substitutes: Early histological and molecular events

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 409-423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Elgali ◽  
Alberto Turri ◽  
Wei Xia ◽  
Birgitta Norlindh ◽  
Anna Johansson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Substitutes ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Molecular Events

Guided Bone Regeneration of Femoral Segmental Defects using Equine Bone Graft: An In-Vivo Micro-Computed Tomographic Study in Rats

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 456-466 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammed Awadh Binsalah ◽  
Sundar Ramalingam ◽  
Mohammed Alkindi ◽  
Nasser Nooh ◽  
Khalid Al-Hezaimi
Keyword(s):  
Bone Graft ◽  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Equine Bone

Effect of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 Associated With a Variety of Bone Substitutes on Vertical Guided Bone Regeneration in Rabbit Calvarium

2013 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 360-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristiane Ibanhes Polo ◽  
Júlio Leonardo Oliveira Lima ◽  
Leandro De Lucca ◽  
Christiano Borges Piacezzi ◽  
Maria da Graça Naclério-Homem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Morphogenetic Protein ◽  
Bone Substitutes ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Human Bone ◽  
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2 ◽  
Morphogenetic Protein ◽  
Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein ◽  
Recombinant Human Bone

Simultaneous in vivo comparison of bone substitutes in a guided bone regeneration model

Biomaterials ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (22) ◽  
pp. 3195-3200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dieter Busenlechner ◽  
Stefan Tangl ◽  
Birgit Mair ◽  
Georg Fugger ◽  
Reinhard Gruber ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Bone Substitutes ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration

scholarly journals Guided Bone Regeneration of an Atrophic Mandible with a Heterologous Bone Block

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 088-093 ◽  
Author(s):  
DaniloAlessio Di Stefano ◽  
GianBattista Greco ◽  
Francesco Riboli
Keyword(s):  
Bone Regeneration ◽  
Guided Bone Regeneration ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Bone Block ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Lower Jaw ◽  
Computed Tomography Scans ◽  
Horizontal Augmentation ◽  
Ridge Width

The aim of this work was to test the effectiveness of using enzymatically deantigenated equine bone block as a scaffold for guided bone regeneration (GBR) during a horizontal augmentation of the lower jaw. A partially edentulous atrophic mandible was augmented using an equine-derived block with an expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membrane. After 8.5 months, two bone core samples were collected at the augmentation site, and implants were placed. A definitive prosthesis delivered 6 months after implant placement provided excellent functional and aesthetic rehabilitation throughout the follow-up period. Histological and histomorphometrical analysis of the biopsies showed newly formed bone to be present and the residual biomaterial was still undergoing remodeling. Comparison of cone beam computed tomography scans taken before augmentation and 26 months later showed maintenance of ridge width and possible corticalization of the vestibular augmented ridge side. The equine-derived bone block placed in accordance with GBR principles provided a successful clinical, radiographic, and histological outcome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document