scholarly journals Digital technologies to support planning, treatment, and fabrication processes and outcome assessments in implant dentistry. Summary and consensus statements. The 4th EAO consensus conference 2015

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 97-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle ◽  
Luca Cordaro ◽  
Nele van Assche ◽  
Goran I. Benic ◽  
Michael Bornstein ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 2153-2160 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Rohan Jeyarajah ◽  
Russell S. Berman ◽  
Majella Doyle ◽  
Sunil K. Geevarghese ◽  
Mitchell C. Posner ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl E. Misch ◽  
Charles J. Goodacre ◽  
Jon M. Finley ◽  
Craig M. Misch ◽  
Mark Marinbach ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1402-1414
Author(s):  
Aisling McFall ◽  
Tuuli M Hietamies ◽  
Ashton Bernard ◽  
Margaux Aimable ◽  
Stuart M Allan ◽  
...  

Assessment of outcome in preclinical studies of vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is heterogenous. Through an ARUK Scottish Network supported questionnaire and workshop (mostly UK-based researchers), we aimed to determine underlying variability and what could be implemented to overcome identified challenges. Twelve UK VCI research centres were identified and invited to complete a questionnaire and attend a one-day workshop. Questionnaire responses demonstrated agreement that outcome assessments in VCI preclinical research vary by group and even those common across groups, may be performed differently. From the workshop, six themes were discussed: issues with preclinical models, reasons for choosing functional assessments, issues in interpretation of functional assessments, describing and reporting functional outcome assessments, sharing resources and expertise, and standardization of outcomes. Eight consensus points emerged demonstrating broadly that the chosen assessment should reflect the deficit being measured, and therefore that one assessment does not suit all models; guidance/standardisation on recording VCI outcome reporting is needed and that uniformity would be aided by a platform to share expertise, material, protocols and procedures thus reducing heterogeneity and so increasing potential for collaboration, comparison and replication. As a result of the workshop, UK wide consensus statements were agreed and future priorities for preclinical research identified.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 137-140 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Wismeijer ◽  
Urs Bragger ◽  
Christopher Evans ◽  
Theodoros Kapos ◽  
Robert Kelly ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 32 (S21) ◽  
pp. 245-253
Author(s):  
Frank Schwarz ◽  
Gil Alcoforado ◽  
Adrian Guerrero ◽  
Daniel Jönsson ◽  
Björn Klinge ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 261-271
Author(s):  
Soundaria Saravanan ◽  
◽  
Chalakuzhiyil Abraham Mathew ◽  
Suresh Kumar Singaravelu ◽  
Praveene Kumar Raju ◽  
...  

Implants are considered as potential alternatives while replacing missing teeth. Accurate planning and placement of implants in a predetermined position, plays an important role in determining the success of the prosthesis. Digital technology refers to the usage of computer controlled components that minimize manual work. In the past decade, digital technologies, like cone beam computer tomography, have been used right from diagnostic phase to treatment planning phase. With the advent of augmented reality, digital technology can be used even during the surgical phase.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document