Evaluation of relationship between preoperative bone density values derived from cone beam computed tomography and implant stability parameters: a clinical study

2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (9) ◽  
pp. 1016-1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fariz Salimov ◽  
Ufuk Tatli ◽  
Mehmet Kürkçü ◽  
Mücahide Akoğlan ◽  
Haluk Öztunç ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Clinical Study ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Stability Parameters ◽  
Density Values

scholarly journals Applicability of cone beam computed tomography gray values for estimation of primary stability of dental implants

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahnaz Sheikhi ◽  
Mehdi Karami ◽  
Somayeh Abbasi ◽  
Amirhossein Moaddabi ◽  
Parisa Soltani
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Bone Density ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Insertion Torque ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Preoperative Selection ◽  
Gray Values

Objective: To evaluate the relationship between bone density measured by computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) (Sirona’s Galileos scanner) with primary stability of dental implants. Material and methods: 20 fresh bovine femoral heads were prepared by removal of soft tissue, sectioning of the bone, and placement of markers for location and angulation of implants. Bone density of peri-implant areas was determined preoperatively by CT and CBCT scanning of the prepared bone samples represented by Hounsfield units (HUs) and gray values (GVs), respectively. Then, 60 implants in three sizes (diameter = 4 mm, length = 8, 10, and 12 mm) were inserted into the bones and maximum insertion torque (IT) was recorded. Osstell device was also used for determining the implant stability quotient (ISQ) for each implant. Statistical analysis was performed on the data (alpha = 0.05). Results: Mean ± SD values of GV, HU, and ISQ were 1592.75 ± 231.82, 675.26 ± 115.38 and 61.90 ± 10.14, respectively. Moreover, the most frequent IT limit was 30-35 Ncm (41.4%). Significant relationships were observed between HU and IT, GV and IT, HU and ISQ, GV and ISQ, and IT and ISQ in all implant sizes. Moreover, GV and HU also significantly correlated to each other. Conclusion: Bone density values in CBCT and CT scans are positively associated to primary stability of dental implants. Therefore, GVs obtained from Galileos CBCT scanner can be used for preoperative selection of edentulous sites which allow for better implant stability or locations which require further procedures for enhancing the success rate of dental implants.  KEYWORDSComputed tomography; Cone beam computed tomography; Dental implant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document