scholarly journals Short implants with a nanometer-sized CaP surface provided with either a platform-switched or platform-matched abutment connection in the posterior region: a randomized clinical trial

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (12) ◽  
pp. 1316-1324 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Telleman ◽  
H. J. A. Meijer ◽  
A. Vissink ◽  
G. M. Raghoebar
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Posterior Region ◽  
Short Implants

Randomized clinical trial evaluating the effect of splinting crowns on short implants in the mandible 3 years after loading

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (11) ◽  
pp. 1061-1071
Author(s):  
Omar Al‐Sawaf ◽  
Taskin Tuna ◽  
Anne Rittich ◽  
Thomas Kern ◽  
Stefan Wolfart
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Short Implants

scholarly journals Two short implants versus one short implant with a cantilever ‐ 5‐year results of a randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (S20) ◽  
pp. 18-18
Author(s):  
Franz Strauss ◽  
Karin Wolleb ◽  
Roman Schellenberg ◽  
Ronald Jung ◽  
Christoph Hämmerle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Short Implant

Narrow- and regular-diameter implants in the posterior region of the jaws to support single crowns: A 3-year split-mouth randomized clinical trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 100-107 ◽  
Author(s):  
André Barbisan de Souza ◽  
Flávia Sukekava ◽  
Livia Tolentino ◽  
João Batista César-Neto ◽  
João Garcez-Filho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Posterior Region ◽  
Single Crowns

scholarly journals Evaluation of Short and Regular Implants after Prosthesis Placement in the Mandible: A Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 1122-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederico S Lages ◽  
Carolina P Rivera ◽  
Ana P de Souza Faloni
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Posterior Region ◽  
Controlled Clinical Trial ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Radiographic Measurements ◽  
Short Implants

ABSTRACT Aim The aim of this nonrandomized controlled preliminary clinical trial was to compare treatment using short and conventional implants in the posterior region of the mandible after prosthesis installation by means of clinical, resonance frequency, and radiographic analyses. Materials and methods A total of 10 patients with 40 dental implants already installed were included in this study. Four implants were installed for each subject, in which the length of the implants (short and conventional) was distributed according to the reminiscent alveolar bone in the left and right side of the mandible. All implants received splinted prosthesis after the osseointegration period. Analyses were performed immediately after prosthesis installation (T1), and 3 (T2) and 6 months (T3) after prosthesis placement. Results The 6-month survival and success rates were 100% for the short and conventional implants. Probing depths (PDs) after 6 months did not show statistical differences between short and conventional implants. All groups showed mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) values above 60 in all periods evaluated, demonstrating great implant stability, and no differences were found between groups at T3. Radiographic measurements showed an increased bone loss for conventional implants compared with short implants in all the three periods evaluated. Conclusion Our findings suggest that treatment of resorbed posterior regions in the mandible with shorter dental implants is as reliable as treatment with conventional implants after 6 months of splinted prosthesis installation. Clinical significance Short implants might be considered a predictable treatment alternative to bone augmentation or extensive surgical techniques in regions of restricted vertical bone height in the posterior region of the mandible. How to cite this article de Molon RS, Lages FS, Rivera CP, de Souza Faloni AP, Margonar R, Queiroz TP. Evaluation of Short and Regular Implants after Prosthesis Placement in the Mandible: A Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Contemp Dent Pract 2017;18(12):1122-1129.

scholarly journals Two short implants versus one short implant with a cantilever – 5‐year results of a randomized clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel S. Thoma ◽  
Karin Wolleb ◽  
Roman Schellenberg ◽  
Franz‐Josef Strauss ◽  
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trial ◽  
Short Implants ◽  
Short Implant
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document