The efficacy of immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla with dehiscence in the facial alveolar bone: A case series

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichiro Mizuno ◽  
Tamaki Nakano ◽  
Takuya Shimomoto ◽  
Yuya Fujita ◽  
Shoichi Ishigaki
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement: Report of Case Series

2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-115
Author(s):  
M. Koray ◽  
I. Ozcan ◽  
B. Alkan ◽  
O. Kesmez ◽  
H. Tanyeri
Keyword(s):  
Tooth Extraction ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Surgical Interventions ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Implant Positioning ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

SUMMARYObjective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcome of immediate postextraction implant placement. Immediate placement of dental implants have been claimed of the potential advantages such as reductions in the number of surgical interventions, a shorter treatment time, an ideal 3-dimensional implant positioning, the presumptive preservation of alveolar bone at the site of the tooth extraction and soft tissue aesthetics.Method: In this case series we reported to extract 15 teeth in 12 patients (8 males; 4 females, mean age: 46.08 years) and replace the teeth with implants immediately.Results: There were no signs of inflammation or infection and none of the patients had complaints subsequently. All implants were osseointegrated at the time of abutment connection. Postoperative healing was uneventful in all of the patients. No complications were observed.Conclusion: Within the limits of the present study, immediate implant placement was a predictable treatment.

Socket Shield Technique Used in Conjunction With Immediate Implant Placement in the Anterior Maxilla: A Case Series

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 64-68
Author(s):  
Vinh Giap Nguyen ◽  
Dennis Flanagan ◽  
John Syrbu ◽  
Thomas T. Nguyen
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant

scholarly journals Gingival recession behavior with immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla with buccal dehiscence without additional augmentation—a pilot study

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1455-1464
Author(s):  
Veronika Pohl ◽  
Lukas Fürhauser ◽  
Robert Haas ◽  
Sebastian Pohl
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Tissue Level ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Background Immediate implant placement in the presence of intact extraction alveoli has frequently been reported, while hardly any reports on immediate implant placement in missing buccal bone can be found in literature. Objectives This pilot study evaluates esthetic outcome and soft and hard tissue level changes of immediate implant placement with immediate provisionalization in patients with partially/completely missing buccal bone without any further augmentation procedure in the maxillary anterior zone. Material and methods Twelve patients (TG) with partially to completely missing buccal bone designated for extraction and flapless immediate implant insertion in the anterior zone of the maxilla were included. Patients randomly selected out of a larger group of patients with immediate implants with intact alveoli served as controls (CG). Immediate provisionalization was done without any further augmentation of the alveolar ridge. Marginal hard and soft tissue levels, PES, and implant success were evaluated during a 1-year observation period. Results The defect of the buccal alveolar bone was 4.96 mm (min., 2.26 mm; max., 9.68 mm) and the mean mesio-distal extension 4.25 mm (min., 3.2 mm; max., 5.91 mm). Preoperative PES differed significantly between TG (9.68) and CG (12.25) and improved in TG postoperatively with no significant difference to CG after 1 year (TG, 10.91; CG, 11.3). The buccal soft tissue level remained almost unchanged over the observation period (TG preop, 0.86 mm ± 0.90 mm; 1 year, 0.91 mm ± 0.96 mm; CG preop, 0.98 mm ± 0.87 mm; 1 year, 0.98 mm ± 0.87 mm and did not show any correlation with either the mesial/distal bone level or the initial buccal vertical defect at any point of time. Conclusions These clinical results provide evidence that immediate implant placement without additional augmentation, but with immediate provisionalization might be a viable treatment alternative even with missing buccal plate in the esthetic maxillary zone.

scholarly journals Immediate Implant Placement In Anterior Maxilla – A Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (SPL3) ◽  
pp. 1452-1457
Author(s):  
Shreya Svitlana Anand ◽  
Ashok Velayudhan ◽  
Jaiganesh Ramamurthy
Keyword(s):  
Alveolar Bone ◽  
Pearson Correlation ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Male Population ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implants ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Maxillary Region

Tooth failure in the region more generally results in a lack of bone volume in the vertical and horizontal direction. On attempts to reduce this alveolar bone resorption to preserve periodontal construction, implant placement was advised immediately after tooth extraction. A retrospective analysis was performed for patients attending a private hospital in Chennai, India. The aim of the study is to study the prevalence of immediate implant placement in the anterior maxilla. Patients who have undergone immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla from June 2019 to March 2020 were included in the study. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel and tabulated. Following which data was imported into the SPSS software by IBM. Data analysis was performed in the statistical software SPSS and data were analyzed by descriptive analysis and Pearson correlation. Within the limits of the study, a total of 77 implants in the anterior maxilla were placed, out of which, 21 implants were immediate implants. From the 21 immediate implants placed, 6 [7.8%] were placed in the anterior maxilla region alone. Immediate Implant in the anterior maxillary region was placed most commonly among the age group 19 to 35 years (14.28%), followed by 9.52% among the age group 55 to 75 years. Immediate Implant in the anterior maxillary region was placed most commonly among the male population (23.81%). Analyzing the etiology of extraction for Immediate Implant Placement, decay (14.29%) was the most common cause of extraction, followed by trauma (9.5%). Replacement assessments can be and guided by the patient's wishes.

Aesthetic rehabilitation with immediate implant placement in anterior maxilla after traumatic avulsive injury. A case report

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahad Umer ◽  
Saqib Habib
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Cortical Plate ◽  
Radiographic Examination ◽  
Incisor Tooth ◽  
Anterior Maxilla ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
And Function ◽  
Variable Clinical Presentation

Traumatic oral injuries present their own unique restorative challenges to the clinician due to their variable clinical presentation. In such cases, achieving optimum aesthetics and function in the maxillary aesthetic zone is challenging. This case report describes the rehabilitation of a patient with immediate implant placement after suffering trauma to the oral cavity resulting in a complete loss (avulsion) of a permanent central incisor tooth. In order to preserve the existing soft and hard tissue and to achieve predictable and aesthetically pleasing results, we decided to place an immediate implant as opposed to replantation of the avulsed tooth. Flapless implant surgery was planned and a dental implant (Bio horizons Implant Systems, Inc.) was placed following non-submerged protocol. At six month’s follow-up, the clinical and radiographic examination revealed a well osseo-integrated implant with an intact buccal cortical plate. Continuous...

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document