Resonance frequency analysis with two different devices after conventional implant placement with ridge preservation: A prospective pilot cohort study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost E. I. G. Brouwers ◽  
Sharon Buis ◽  
Philip G. Groot ◽  
Bas Laat ◽  
Jasper A. Remijn
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Ridge Preservation ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Placement

Comparison of Delayed Implant Placement vs Immediate Implant Placement Using Resonance Frequency Analysis: A Pilot Study on Rabbits

2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashish T. Kunnekel ◽  
Mohit T. Dudani ◽  
Chandrasekharan K. Nair ◽  
E. M. Naidu ◽  
G. Sivagami
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Test Group ◽  
Placement Test ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Immediate Placement ◽  
Immediate Implant ◽  
Delayed Implant Placement

Ten identical implants were equally divided into 2 groups. In the immediate placement (control) group, implants were placed immediately following osteotomy preparation, and in the delayed placement (test) group, implants were placed 2 weeks following osteotomy preparation, in rabbit femurs. Implant stability quotient values for both groups were measured using resonance frequency analysis immediately following placement and at day 40. Results were statistically analyzed and indicate that delayed placement of implants leads to faster rates of osseointegration.

scholarly journals Influence of Implant Dimensions and Position on Implant Stability: A Prospective Clinical Study in Maxilla Using Resonance Frequency Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Nappo ◽  
Carlo Rengo ◽  
Giuseppe Pantaleo ◽  
Gianrico Spagnuolo ◽  
Marco Ferrari
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Dental Implant ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Prospective Clinical Study ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Implant Stability Quotient ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Implant System

Implant stability is relevant for the correct osseointegration and long-term success of dental implant treatments. The aim of this study has been to evaluate the influence of implant dimensions and position on primary and secondary stability of implants placed in maxilla using resonance frequency analysis. Thirty-one healthy patients who underwent dental implant placement were enrolled for the study. A total of 70 OsseoSpeed TX (Astra Tech Implant System—Dentsply Implants; Mölndal, Sweden) implants were placed. All implants have been placed according to a conventional two-stage surgical procedure according to the manufacturer instructions. Bone quality and implant stability quotient were recorded. Mean implant stability quotient (ISQ) at baseline (ISQ1) was statistically significant lower compared to 3-months post-implant placement (ISQ2) (p < 0.05). Initial implant stability was significantly higher with 4 mm diameter implants with respect to 3.5 mm. No differences were observed within maxilla regions. Implant length, diameter and maxillary regions have an influence on primary stability.

scholarly journals Comparison of Implant Stability between Regenerated and Non-Regenerated Bone. A Prospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 3220
Author(s):  
Marta Vallecillo-Rivas ◽  
Candela Reyes-Botella ◽  
Cristina Vallecillo ◽  
María Jesús Lisbona-González Manuel Vallecillo-Capilla ◽  
María Victoria Olmedo-Gaya
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Native Bone ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Implant Stability Quotient ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Secondary Stability

Implant stability is one of the main indicators of successful osseointegration. Although it has been measured in numerous studies, there has been little research on implant stability in regenerated bone. The study compares primary and secondary stability between implants placed in regenerated versus native bone and evaluates the influence of bone quality on the results. Sixty implants were placed in 31 patients: 30 implants inserted in native bone (non-regenerated) after a healing period of at least 6 months post-exodontia and 30 inserted in regenerated bone at 6 months after grafting with xenograft. Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) was used to obtain implant stability quotient (ISQ) values at baseline (implant placement), 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Statistically significant differences were found between implants placed in regenerated bone and those placed in native bone at all measurement time points (p < 0.05). ISQ values were significantly influenced by bone quality at baseline (p < 0.05) but not at 8 or 12 weeks. Greater stability was obtained in implants placed in native bone; however, those placed in regenerated bone showed adequate primary and secondary stability for prosthetic loading. Bone quality influences the primary but not secondary stability of the implants in both native and regenerated bone.

scholarly journals Measurement of Primary and Secondary Stability of Dental Implants by Resonance Frequency Analysis Method in Mandible

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mehran Shokri ◽  
Arash Daraeighadikolaei
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Dental Implants ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Placement ◽  
Stability Measurement ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Over 40 Years ◽  
Secondary Stability

Background.There is no doubt that the success of the dental implants depends on the stability. The aim of this work was to measure the stability of dental implants prior to loading the implants, using a resonance frequency analysis (RFA) by Osstell mentor device.Methods.Ten healthy and nonsmoker patients over 40 years of age with at least six months of complete or partial edentulous mouth received screw-type dental implants by a 1-stage procedure. RFA measurements were obtained at surgery and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 11 weeks after the implant surgery.Results.Among fifteen implants, the lowest mean stability measurement was for the 4th week after surgery in all bone types. At placement, the mean ISQ obtained with the magnetic device was 77.2 with 95% confidence interval(CI)  =2.49, and then it decreased until the 4th week to 72.13 (95%CI=2.88), and at the last measurement, the mean implant stability significantly (Pvalue<0.05) increased and recorded higher values to 75.6 (95%CI=1.88), at the 11th week.Conclusions.The results may be indicative of a period of time when loading might be disadvantageous prior to the 4th week following implant placement. These suggestions need to be further assessed through future studies.

Influence of Bone Quality, Drilling Protocol, Implant Diameter/Length on Primary Stability: An In Vitro Comparative Study on Insertion Torque and Resonance Frequency Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 182-189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Farronato ◽  
Mattia Manfredini ◽  
Michele Stocchero ◽  
Mattia Caccia ◽  
Lorenzo Azzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Primary Stability ◽  
Mean Difference ◽  
Insertion Torque ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Bone Response ◽  
Implant Length

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of bone quality, drilling technique, implant diameter, and implant length on insertion torque (IT) and resonance frequency analysis (RFA) of a prototype-tapered implant with knife-edge threads. The investigators hypothesized that IT would be affected by variations in bone quality and drilling protocol, whereas RFA would be less influenced by such variables. The investigators implemented an in vitro experiment in which a prototype implant was inserted with different testing conditions into rigid polyurethane foam blocks. The independent variables were: bone quality, drilling protocol, implant diameter, and implant length. Group A implants were inserted with a conventional drilling protocol, whereas Group B implants were inserted with an undersized drilling protocol. Values of IT and RFA were measured at implant installation. IT and RFA values were significantly correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient: 0.54). A multivariable analysis showed a strong model. Higher IT values were associated with drilling protocol B vs A (mean difference: 71.7 Ncm), implant length (3.6 Ncm increase per mm in length), and substrate density (0.199 Ncm increase per mg/cm3 in density). Higher RFA values were associated with drilling protocol B vs A (mean difference: 3.9), implant length (1.0 increase per mm in length), and substrate density (0.032 increase per mg/cm3 in density). Implant diameter was not associated with RFA or IT. Within the limitations of an in vitro study, the results of this study suggest that the studied implant can achieve good level of primary stability in terms of IT and RFA. A strong correlation was found between values of IT and RFA. Both parameters are influenced by the drilling protocol, implant length, and substrate density. Further studies are required to investigate the clinical response in primary stability and marginal bone response.

scholarly journals Effects of photofunctionalization on early osseointegration of titanium dental implants in the maxillary posterior region: a randomized double-blinded clinical trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bada Choi ◽  
Ye Chan Lee ◽  
Kyung Chul Oh ◽  
Jae Hoon Lee
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Bone Quality ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Posterior Region ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Group Iii ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Double Blinded

Abstract Background This study aimed to investigate the effects of ultraviolet (UV) photofunctionalization on the stability of implants during the early phase in the posterior region of the maxilla. The study was a randomized double-blinded clinical trial. Half of the participants received conventional commercial implants while the other half received UV-irradiated implants. The surgical sites were classified into three bone quality groups (II, III, IV) based on the grayscale value measured on cone-beam computed tomography. The values obtained from resonance frequency analysis were recorded immediately after implant placement and at 4 weeks and at 4 months postoperatively. The marginal bone level of the implants was evaluated using periapical radiographs at 4 weeks, 4 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Results Fifty-seven implants placed in 34 participants were analyzed in this study. In group III, significant differences were observed in terms of the differences of resonance frequency analysis values at 4 weeks (p = 0.004) and 4 months (p = 0.017) postoperatively. In group II, the UV-treated group showed significantly lesser bone loss at 4 weeks post-operatively (p = 0.037). Conclusions Within the limitation of the present study, we concluded that UV surface treatment on implants may increase the initial stability in the region of the maxilla with poor bone quality.

scholarly journals Does the manual insertion torque of smartpegs affect the outcome of implant stability quotients (ISQ) during resonance frequency analysis (RFA)?

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ingrid Kästel ◽  
Giles de Quincey ◽  
Jörg Neugebauer ◽  
Robert Sader ◽  
Peter Gehrke
Keyword(s):  
Resonance Frequency ◽  
Frequency Analysis ◽  
Insertion Torque ◽  
Resonance Frequency Analysis ◽  
Implant Stability ◽  
Reliable Determination ◽  
Torque Values ◽  
Finger Pressure

Abstract Background There is disagreement about the optimal torque for tightening smartpegs for resonance frequency analysis (RFA). Subjective finger pressure during hand tightening could affect the reliability of the resulting values. The aim of the current study was therefore to assess whether or not the insertion torque of a smartpeg magnetic device influences the implant stability quotient (ISQ) value during RFA. Methods Thirty self-tapping screw implants (XiVE S, Dentsply Sirona Implants, Bensheim, Germany) with a diameter of 3.8 mm and a length of 11 mm were inserted in three cow ribs with a bone quality of D1. The RFA value of each implant was measured (Ostell, FA W&H Dentalwerk, Bürmoos, Austria) in two orthogonal directions (mesial and buccal) after tightening the corresponding smartpeg type 45 with a mechanically defined value of 5 Ncm (Meg Torq device, Megagen, Daegu, South Korea) (test). Additionally, 4 different examiners measured the RFA after hand tightening the smartpegs, and the results were compared (control). Insertion torque values were determined by measuring the unscrew torque of hand seated smartpegs (Tohnichi Manufacturing Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Results The ISQ values varied from 2 to 11 Ncm by hand tightening and from 2 to 6 Ncm by machine tightening. The comparison of hand and machine tightening of smartpegs displayed only minor differences in the mean ISQ values with low standard deviations (mesial 79.76 ± 2,11, buccal 77.98 ± 2,) and no statistical difference (mesial p = 0,343 and buccal p = 0,890). Conclusions Manual tightening of smartpeg transducers allows for an objective and reliable determination of ISQ values during RFA.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document