Paraganglioma and other tumor detection rates in individuals with SDHx pathogenic variants by age of diagnosis and after the age of 50

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha E. Greenberg ◽  
Rachel Holman ◽  
Wendy Kohlmann ◽  
Luke Buchmann ◽  
Anne Naumer
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Detection ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis

Declining Detection Rates for APC and Biallelic MUTYH Pathogenic Variants in Polyposis Patients, Implications for DNA Testing Policy

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diantha Terlouw ◽  
Manon Suerink ◽  
Sunny Singh ◽  
J. T. van Wezel ◽  
J. J. P. Gille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Testing ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Pathogenic Variants

scholarly journals Assessment of genetic referrals and outcomes for women with triple negative breast cancer in regional cancer centres in Australia

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucie G. Hallenstein ◽  
Carol Sorensen ◽  
Lorraine Hodgson ◽  
Shelly Wen ◽  
Justin Westhuyzen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Cancer Genetics ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Genetics Services ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
Over Time

Abstract Background Guidelines for referral to cancer genetics service for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer have changed over time. This study was conducted to assess the changing referral patterns and outcomes for women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer across three regional cancer centres during the years 2014–2018. Methods Following ethical approval, a retrospective electronic medical record review was performed to identify those women diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer, and whether they were referred to a genetics service and if so, the outcome of that genetics assessment and/or genetic testing. Results There were 2441 women with newly diagnosed breast cancer seen at our cancer services during the years 2014–2018, of whom 237 women were diagnosed with triple negative breast cancer. Based on age of diagnosis criteria alone, 13% (31/237) of our cohort fulfilled criteria for genetic testing, with 81% (25/31) being referred to a cancer genetics service. Of this group 68% (21/31) were referred to genetics services within our regions and went on to have genetic testing with 10 pathogenic variants identified; 5x BRCA1, 4x BRCA2 and × 1 ATM:c.7271 T > G. Conclusions Referral pathways for women diagnosed with TNBC to cancer genetics services are performing well across our cancer centres. We identified a group of women who did not meet eligibility criteria for referral at their time of diagnosis, but would now be eligible, as guidelines have changed. The use of cross-discipline retrospective data reviews is a useful tool to identify patients who could benefit from being re-contacted over time for an updated cancer genetics assessment.

Comparative analysis of diagnostic procedures for tumor detection rates in paired data

2018 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1477-1488
Author(s):  
Yaeji Lim ◽  
Ji Soo Choi ◽  
Kiyoun Kim ◽  
Mira Park ◽  
Seonwoo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Positive Predictive Value ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Correct Diagnosis ◽  
Disease Status ◽  
Diagnostic Procedures ◽  
Tumor Detection ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Test Statistic ◽  
Paired Data ◽  
Detection Rates

Diagnostic procedures are mostly used to detect a particular disease, and each procedure indicates the presence or absence of the disease in an individual. Sensitivity and positive predictive value, which are measures of the effectiveness of a diagnostic procedure, are simply calculated as the proportion of the individuals diagnosed with the disease by the test among the patients with the disease, and of the diseased persons among the individuals in whom the disease was detected by the test, respectively. For a diagnosis with such a binary result, sensitivity and the positive predictive value of diagnostic procedures can be compared using the chi-square statistic. However, in the treatment of cancer patients, it is important not only to diagnose the disease status of an individual patient but also to detect the correct location of the cancer. The tumor location may be incorrectly identified in some subjects diagnosed with cancer. It is therefore of interest whether a procedure that diagnoses cancer also correctly indicates the tumor location. In this paper, we re-define the sensitivity and the positive predictive value of tumor detection as the ratio of the number of cases with a correct diagnosis of the tumor location by the test to the number of cases of cancer, and as the ratio of patients with a correct diagnosis of the tumor location to the number of individuals diagnosed with cancer by the test, respectively. We refer to these parameters as ‘semi-sensitivity’ and ‘semi-positive predictive value’. To compare these ratios between diagnostic procedures, test statistics are developed from binary diagnostic results. Simulation studies conducted to evaluate the nominal level and power are presented, and two sets of example data are also analyzed using the new test statistic.

scholarly journals Breast Cancer Screening Trials: Endpoints and Overdiagnosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ismail Jatoi ◽  
Paul F Pinsky
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Breast Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Detection ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Tumor Detection ◽  
Breast Cancer Detection ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Screening Strategies ◽  
Screening Trials

Abstract Screening mammography was assessed in 9 randomized trials initiated between 1963 and 1990, with breast cancer-specific mortality as the primary endpoint. In contrast, breast cancer detection has been the primary endpoint in most screening trials initiated during the past decade. These trials have evaluated digital breast tomosynthesis, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, and novel screening strategies have been recommended solely on the basis of improvements in breast cancer detection rates. Yet, the assumption that increases in tumor detection produce reductions in cancer mortality has not been validated, and tumor-detection endpoints may exacerbate the problem of overdiagnosis. Indeed, the detection of greater numbers of early stage breast cancers in the absence of a subsequent decline in rates of metastatic cancers and cancer-related mortality is the hallmark of overdiagnosis. There is now evidence to suggest that both ductal carcinoma in situ and invasive cancers are overdiagnosed as a consequence of screening. For each patient who is overdiagnosed with breast cancer, the adverse consequences include unnecessary anxiety, financial hardships, and a small risk of morbidity and mortality from unnecessary treatments. Moreover, the overtreatment of breast cancer, as a consequence of overdiagnosis, is costly and contributes to waste in health-care spending. In this article, we argue that there is a need to establish better endpoints in breast cancer screening trials, including quality of life and composite endpoints. Tumor-detection endpoints should be abandoned, because they may lead to the implementation of screening strategies that increase the risk of overdiagnosis.

scholarly journals Germline variants and phenotypic spectrum in a Canadian cohort of individuals with diffuse gastric cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Aronson ◽  
C. Swallow ◽  
A. Govindarajan ◽  
K. Semotiuk ◽  
Z. Cohen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Diffuse Gastric Cancer ◽  
Cancer Syndrome ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Inherited Cancer ◽  
Panel Testing ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Gene Panel Testing

Background CDH1 pathogenic variants (PV) cause the majority of inherited diffuse-gastric cancer (DGC), but have low detection rates and vary geographically. This study examines hereditary causes of DGC in patients from Ontario, Canada. Methods Eligible DGC cases at the Zane Cohen Centre (ZCC) underwent multi-gene panel or CDH1 single-site testing if they met 2015 International Gastric Cancer Linkage Consortium (IGCLC) criteria, isolated DGC <50 or family history suggestive of an inherited cancer syndrome. A secondary aim was to review all CDH1 families at the ZCC to assess cancer penetrance. Results 85 DGC patients underwent CDH1 (n=43) or multi-gene panel testing (n=42), and 15 (17.6%) PV or likely PV were identified.  CDH1 detection rate was 9.4% (n=8/85), and 11% (n=7/65) using IGCLC criteria.  No CDH1 PV identified in isolated DGC <40, but one PV identified in isolated DGC<50.  Multi-gene panel from 42 individuals identified 9 PV (21.4%) including CDH1, STK11, ATM, BRCA2, MLH1 and MSH2.  Review of 81 CDH1 carriers revealed that 10% had DGC (median age:48, range:38-59), 41% were unaffected (median age:53, range:26-89).  Three families had lobular-breast cancer (LBC) only.  Non-DGC/LBC malignancies included colorectal, gynecological, kidney/bladder, prostate, testicular and ductal breast. Conclusions Low detection rate of CDH1 in Ontario DGC patients.  No CDH1 PV found in isolated DGC <40, but identified in isolated DGC<50. Multi-gene panels are recommended for all DGC under age 50, and those meeting the IGCLC criteria, given overlapping phenotype with other hereditary conditions. HDGC phenotype is evolving with a spectrum of non-DGC/LBC cancers.

Inherited germline mutations in men with prostate cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16564-e16564
Author(s):  
Robert Reid ◽  
Marcie DiGiovanni ◽  
Ryan Bernhisel ◽  
Krystal Brown ◽  
Jennifer Saam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Commercial Laboratory ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
History Of

e16564 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes that confer hereditary cancer risk among men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC); however, PC does not currently receive attention as an indication for genetic testing. We assessed the clinical features of men with PC who received clinical testing as well as the distribution of PVs identified. Methods: A commercial laboratory database was queried to identify men with PC who underwent testing with a multi-gene hereditary cancer panel from September 2013–September 2016. Clinical information was obtained from provider-completed test request forms. Individuals with PC only were evaluated separately from those who had ≥1 additional malignancy. Personal/family history was evaluated relative to the 2013 NCCN guidelines for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) testing. Results: Overall, 700 men with a personal history of PC were identified: 384 (54.9%) with only PC and 316 (45.1%) with PC and ≥1 additional malignancy. The most common additional malignancies were colorectal (115) and breast cancer (105). The median age of diagnosis in men with only PC was 57.5, which is younger than tested men who had an additional malignancy (62) and the SEER data (2009-2013) for all men with PC (66). HBOC testing criteria were met by 75.9% of men, including 44 (6.3%) who met based only on a personal/family history of PC and 202 (28.9%) who met in part due to a personal/family history of PC. PVs were identified in 14.0% of all men: 11.5% of men with PC only and 17.1% of men with PC and a second malignancy (see Table). Conclusions: PC patients selected for genetic testing here were younger than men diagnosed with PC from the general population (SEER), and almost half had a diagnosis of an additional malignancy. They also have a high positive mutation rate across a broad spectrum of genes. [Table: see text]

Inherited germline mutations in men with prostate cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 357-357
Author(s):  
Robert Reid ◽  
Marcie DiGiovanni ◽  
Ryan Bernhisel ◽  
Krystal Brown ◽  
Jennifer Saam ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Family History ◽  
Hereditary Cancer ◽  
Clinical Information ◽  
Nccn Guidelines ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Seer Data ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
History Of

357 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of pathogenic variants (PVs) in genes that confer hereditary cancer risk among men with metastatic prostate cancer (PC); however, PC does not currently receive attention as an indication for genetic testing. We assessed the clinical features of men with PC who received clinical testing as well as the distribution of PVs identified. Methods: Men with PC who underwent testing with a multi-gene hereditary cancer panel (Myriad Genetic Laboratories) from September 2013–September 2017 were included. Clinical information was obtained from provider-completed test request forms. Individuals with PC only were evaluated separately from those who had ≥1 additional malignancy. Personal/family history was evaluated relative to the 2013 NCCN guidelines for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) testing. Results: Overall, 1004 men with a personal history of PC were identified: 606 (60.4%) with only PC and 398 (39.6%) with PC and ≥1 additional malignancy. The most common additional malignancies were breast (136) and colorectal cancer (134). The median age of diagnosis in men with only PC was 59, which is younger than tested men who had an additional malignancy (63) and the SEER data (2009-2013) for all men with PC (66). HBOC testing criteria were met by 78.0% of men, including 68 (6.8%) who met based only on a personal/family history of PC and 330 (32.9%) who met in part due to a personal/family history of PC. PVs were identified in 12.9% of all men: 11.2% of men with PC only and 15.4% of men with PC and a second malignancy (Table). Conclusions: PC patients selected for genetic testing here were younger than men diagnosed with PC from the general population (SEER), and about a third had a diagnosis of an additional malignancy. They also have a high positive mutation rate across a broad spectrum of genes. [Table: see text]

Tumor detection rates in screening carriers with SDHx-related hereditary paraganglioma-pheochromocytoma syndrome based on prior tumor history.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1545-1545
Author(s):  
Samantha Greenberg ◽  
Michelle Jacobs ◽  
Heather Wachtel ◽  
Amanda Anson ◽  
Luke Buchmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screening Program ◽  
Tumor Detection ◽  
Whole Body ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Whole Body Imaging ◽  
Detection Rates ◽  
Expert Recommendation ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
History Of ◽  
Biochemical Testing

1545 Background: Patients with germline pathogenic variants (PVs) in the SDHx genes have increased risk for paragangliomas/pheochromocytomas (PGL/PCC), renal cell carcinomas, and gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Expert recommendation suggests individuals with SDHx PVs undergo biennial whole-body imaging and annual biochemical testing. This study aimed to evaluate tumor detection rate using standard biochemical and imaging protocols for individuals with SDHx PVs, particularly in those with and without SDHx-related tumor history, and in those with biochemical testing data. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal observational study at the Universities of Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute was conducted from the start of each center’s screening program through March 1, 2018. Individuals with SDHx PVs had clinical imaging with whole body MRI/CT and biochemical testing per expert recommendation. SDHx-related tumors identified during clinical screening were measured. Results: A total of 263 individuals with SDHx PVs completed 491 screens. Individuals with SDHB PVs were the most prevalent (n = 188, 71.5%). The average number of screens per subject was 1.87 (range 1-7). A majority (n = 194, 73.7%) of individuals did not have a prior history of PGL/PCC. Overall, SDHx-related tumors were detected in 17.1% (n = 45) of the cohort. Of the 46 scans that identified an SDHx-related tumor, 85% of them (n = 39) were baseline scans. SDHx-related tumors were identified in 18.6% (n = 36/194) of individuals that did not have a prior history of PGL/PCC, whereas they were identified in 13.0% (n = 9/69) of individuals that did have a prior history of PGL/PCC (p = 0.39). Biochemical testing was available for 70% (n = 343) of imaging screens, of which 18% (n = 61) had positive biochemistry. Of those with positive biochemistry, 19 tumors were identified on imaging (6%). Sixteen tumors were identified on imaging with negative biochemistry (5%) with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 94%. Utilizing a cut-off of two times the upper limit of normal, 9.91% (n = 34) biochemical tests were positive, and 15 (44.12%) had an SDHx-related tumor on corresponding imaging. Conclusions: Current SDHx screening protocols are effective at identifying SDHx-related tumors. Tumors were detected in subjects with a prior history of PGL/PCC and those with no prior history. This suggests life-long screening is important for all SDHx carriers. Imaging is a crucial piece of SDHx screening given biochemical testing’s sensitivity and specificity.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer with double somatic mismatch repair mutations compared with Lynch syndrome

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (7) ◽  
pp. 462-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel Pearlman ◽  
Sigurdis Haraldsdottir ◽  
Albert de la Chapelle ◽  
Jon G Jonasson ◽  
Sandya Liyanarachchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Lynch Syndrome ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Clinical Characteristics ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Mmr Proteins

BackgroundPatients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) tumours without MLH1 methylation or germline MMR pathogenic variants (PV) were previously thought to have Lynch syndrome (LS). It is now appreciated that they can have double somatic (DS) MMR PVs. We explored the clinical characteristics between patients with DS tumours and LS in two population-based cohorts.MethodsWe included patients with CRC from Ohio 2013–2016 and Iceland 2000–2009. All had microsatellite instability testing and/or immunohistochemistry (IHC) of MMR proteins, and MLH1 methylation testing when indicated. Germline next-generation sequencing was performed for all with dMMR tumours; tumour sequencing followed for patients with unexplained dMMR. Clinical characteristics of DS patients and patients with LS were compared.ResultsOf the 232 and 51 patients with non-methylated dMMR tumours in the Ohio and Iceland cohorts, respectively, 57.8% (n=134) and 45.1% (n=23) had LS, 32.8% (n=76) and 31.4% (n=16) had DS PVs, 6% (n=14) and 9.8% (n=5) were unexplained and 4.3% (n=10) and 13.7% (n=7) had incorrect IHC. Age of diagnosis for DS patients was older than patients with LS (p=3.73×10−4) in the two cohorts. Patients with LS were more likely to meet Amsterdam II criteria (OR=15.81, p=8.47×10−6) and have multiple LS-associated tumours (OR=6.67, p=3.31×10−5). Absence of MLH1/PMS2 was predictive of DS PVs; isolated MSH6 and PMS2 absence was predictive of LS in both cohorts.ConclusionsIndividuals with LS are 15× more likely to meet Amsterdam II criteria and >5× more likely to have multiple cancers as compared with those with DS tumours. Furthermore, isolated loss of MSH6 or PMS2 protein predicts LS.

scholarly journals Description of a SDHD c.129G>A (p.W43X) Mutation With Variable Presentation in Multiple Family Members

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A995-A995
Author(s):  
Samantha Greenberg ◽  
Buchmann Luke ◽  
Anne Naumer ◽  
Wendy Kohlmann ◽  
Kinley Garfield ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Family Members ◽  
Tumor Development ◽  
Large Family ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Pathogenic Variants ◽  
Bilateral Carotid ◽  
Age Of Diagnosis ◽  
Inherited Mutations ◽  
Variable Penetrance ◽  
First Diagnosis

Abstract Approximately 40% of paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas are attributed to hereditary mutations. SDHD mutations account for 7% of inherited mutations (PGL1 syndrome), is maternally imprinted and has variable penetrance. SDHD pathogenic variants (PV) have been previously described extensively in Dutch pedigrees, with a varying lifetime risk for tumor development. Here we report a large family (Fig 1) displaying a SDHD c.129G&gt;A (p.W43X) variation in 12 family members, 10 of whom had screening or tumor history available. The presentation and age of diagnosis in family members showed variable penetrance. Age at first diagnosis of a pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma ranged from 10 - 45 years. Family members displayed bilateral pheochromocytomas, bilateral carotid body tumors, and paragangliomas of the head, neck and trunk with variable recurrence rates (none to multiple). No malignant lesions were detected to date. Pheochromocytomas were norepinephrine producing. Paragangliomas ranged from non-functional to dopamine and norepinephrine producing. Compared to previous reports of other SDHD mutations, the SDHD c.129G&gt;A (p.W43X) variation displayed an earlier age at first diagnosis with a highly variable phenotype ranging from one benign, non-secreting paraganglioma to bilateral pheochromocytomas and recurrent parganagliomas along the parasympathetic chain from head to abdomen. This report contributes to the evolving understanding of the phenotypic presentations of various genetic mutations. We propose that expert guidelines that suggest screening family members with the SDHD c.129G&gt;A (p.W43X) variation at the age of 8 for early detection of pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas is beneficial.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document