Effects of oral α-lipoic acid administration on body weight in overweight or obese subjects: a crossover randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 86 (5) ◽  
pp. 680-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nong Li ◽  
Weili Yan ◽  
Xiaojuan Hu ◽  
Yongdi Huang ◽  
Fugang Wang ◽  
...  
Diabetes ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 2390-2395 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Wynne ◽  
A. J. Park ◽  
C. J. Small ◽  
M. Patterson ◽  
S. M. Ellis ◽  
...  

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. e024065 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henrik Gudbergsen ◽  
Marius Henriksen ◽  
Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens ◽  
Anders Overgaard ◽  
Henning Bliddal ◽  
...  

IntroductionWith an increasing prevalence of citizens of older age and with overweight, the health issues related to knee osteoarthritis (OA) will intensify. Weight loss is considered a primary management strategy in patients with concomitant overweight and knee OA. However, there are no widely available and feasible methods to sustain weight loss in patients with overweight and knee OA. The present protocol describes a randomised controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide in a 3 mg/day dosing in patients with overweight and knee OA.Methods and analysis150 volunteer adult patients with overweight or obesity and knee OA will participate in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group and single-centre trial. The participants will partake in a run-in diet intervention phase (week −8 to 0) including a low calorie diet and dietetic counselling. At week 0, patients will be randomised to either liraglutide 3 mg/day or liraglutide placebo 3 mg/day for 52 weeks as an add-on to dietetic guidance on re-introducing regular foods and a focus on continued motivation to engage in a healthy lifestyle. The co-primary outcomes are changes in body weight and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score pain subscale from week 0 to week 52.Ethics and disseminationThe trial has been approved by the regional ethics committee in the Capital Region of Denmark, the Danish Medicines Agency and the Danish Data Protection Agency. An external monitoring committee (The Good Clinical Practice Unit at Copenhagen University Hospitals) will oversee the trial. The results will be presented at international scientific meetings and through publications in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numbers2015-005163-16,NCT02905864, U1111-1171-4970Based on protocol versionV.6; 30 January 2017, 15:30 hours


2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shoketsu Hitoe ◽  
Hiroshi Shimoda

Background: Fucoxanthin is a seaweed xanthophyll that has demonstrated an anti-obesity effect in rodents. However, clinical investigations of its influence on mildly obese subjects has not been performed. We conducted a clinical trial of fucoxanthin supplementation in Japanese obese subjects. Methods: We examined the effect of fucoxanthin (1 or 3 mg daily) in a double-blind placebo-controlled study. Capsules containing fucoxanthin or placebo capsules were administered for 4 weeks to male and female Japanese adults with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 25 kg/m2. Before and after treatment, the body weight, body composition, abdominal fat area, and the circumferences of the neck, arm, and thigh were evaluated.Results: There was significant reduction of the relative (ratio versus before treatment) body weight, BMI, and visceral fat area in the 3 mg/day fucoxanthin group compared to the placebo group. Relative values of total fat mass, subcutaneous fat area, waist circumference, and right thigh circumference were also significantly lower in the 1 mg/day fucoxanthin group than the placebo group. A significant decrease of the absolute right thigh circumference was noted in the 1 mg/day fucoxanthin group compared to the placebo group. In the subjects ingesting fucoxanthin, there were no abnormalities of the blood pressure, pulse rate, blood parameters, and urinalysis parameters, which thereby suggests adverse effects. Conclusions: Fucoxanthin reduced body weight, BMI, and abdominal fat by acting on both visceral and subcutaneous fat. Consequently, Fucoxanthin may be able to improve a moderate overweight state in both men and women. Keywords: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial; fucoxanthin; body mass index; body weight; subcutaneous fat; adipose tissue


2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. 1638-1638
Author(s):  
Erin Glynn ◽  
Stephen Fleming ◽  
Heather Leidy ◽  
Michael Wilson

Abstract Objectives To determine if greater weight loss and improvement in metabolic outcomes could be achieved with twice daily consumption of a proprietary supplement shake containing high protein and fiber (HPF) as compared to an isocaloric low protein, lower fiber placebo (P). Methods In an independently conducted randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-center clinical trial, healthy overweight and obese adults (n = 206, BMI 27–35 kg/m2, 70% Female) were equally assigned to HPF or P. All participants were instructed to follow a 500-calorie deficit diet from estimated daily energy requirements using a dietary exchange program and were asked to consume HPF or P 30 min before breakfast and lunch for 12 weeks. The supplement was a commercially available product composed of protein, fruit, vegetable, and plant powders, as well as vitamins, minerals, pre-, and probiotics. Body weight, body composition, and blood samples were collected at days (D) 0 and 84. Statistics were conducted by ANCOVA or repeated measure ANCOVA modeling using sex and baseline values as covariates, with time and treatment as within- and between-subject variables, respectively. Per protocol analyses were included for the 133 adults who completed the study. Results Weight loss occurred throughout the study in both groups. HPF had greater weight loss at D 84 vs P (–4.0% vs −2.2% body weight, respectively; P < 0.05). Total cholesterol, LDL, and oxidized LDL decreased to a greater extent following HPF at D 84 (P < 0.05 vs D 0 and vs P), with no change in HDL cholesterol. The increase in serum adiponectin from D 0 to D 84 was greater in HPF vs P (P < 0.05) with no change in leptin. Percent body fat tended to decrease throughout the study in both groups (HPF: −1.44%, P: −1.27%; P = 0.056) with no differences between groups. There were no clinically relevant changes in assessed safety outcomes in either group. Conclusions A HPF supplement taken as a preload before breakfast and lunch improved weight loss and metabolic outcomes such as total, LDL and oxidized LDL cholesterol compared to a calorie-matched placebo. This study suggests nutrient factors other than calorie reduction alone influence the success of a weight loss regimen, potentially including nutrient density, protein and fiber content. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03057873. Funding Sources This study was funded by Beachbody, LLC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document