scholarly journals Let’s Cross the Next One: Parental Scaffolding of Prospective Control Over Movement

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth E. O’Neal ◽  
Shiwen Zhou ◽  
Yuanyuan Jiang ◽  
Joseph K. Kearney ◽  
Jodie M. Plumert
2005 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 668-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joost C. Dessing ◽  
C. (Lieke) E. Peper ◽  
Daniel Bullock ◽  
Peter J. Beek

The cerebral cortex contains circuitry for continuously computing properties of the environment and one's body, as well as relations among those properties. The success of complex perceptuomotor performances requires integrated, simultaneous use of such relational information. Ball catching is a good example as it involves reaching and grasping of visually pursued objects that move relative to the catcher. Although integrated neural control of catching has received sparse attention in the neuroscience literature, behavioral observations have led to the identification of control principles that may be embodied in the involved neural circuits. Here, we report a catching experiment that refines those principles via a novel manipulation. Visual field motion was used to perturb velocity information about balls traveling on various trajectories relative to a seated catcher, with various initial hand positions. The experiment produced evidence for a continuous, prospective catching strategy, in which hand movements are planned based on gaze-centered ball velocity and ball position information. Such a strategy was implemented in a new neural model, which suggests how position, velocity, and temporal information streams combine to shape catching movements. The model accurately reproduces the main and interaction effects found in the behavioral experiment and provides an interpretation of recently observed target motion-related activity in the motor cortex during interceptive reaching by monkeys. It functionally interprets a broad range of neurobiological and behavioral data, and thus contributes to a unified theory of the neural control of reaching to stationary and moving targets.


Motor Control ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 289-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jebb G. Remelius ◽  
Richard E.A. van Emmerik

This study investigated timing and coordination during the swing phase of swing leg, body center of mass (CoM) and head during walking people with multiple sclerosis (MS; n = 19) and controls (n = 19). The MS group showed differences in swing phase timing at all speeds. At imposed but not preferred speeds, the MS group had less time to prepare for entry into the unstable equilibrium, as the CoM entered this phase of swing earlier. Time-to-contact coupling, quantifying the coordination between the CoM and the swing foot, was not different between groups. The projection of head motion on the ground occurred earlier after toeoff and was positioned closer to the body in the MS group, illustrating increased reliance on visual exproprioception in which vision of the body in relation to the surface of support is established. Finally, prospective control, linking head movements to the swing foot time-to-contact and next step landing area, was impaired in the MS group at higher gait speeds.


2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 441-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Adolph ◽  
Marion A. Eppler ◽  
Ludo Marin ◽  
Idell B. Weise ◽  
Melissa Wechsler Clearfield
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document