scholarly journals Changes in verbal and visuospatial working memory from Grade 1 to Grade 3 of primary school: Population longitudinal study

2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Nicolaou ◽  
J. Quach ◽  
J. Lum ◽  
G. Roberts ◽  
M. Spencer-Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Primary School ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
School Population ◽  
Grade 3

scholarly journals Development of white matter microstructure in relation to verbal and visuospatial working memory—A longitudinal study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. e0195540 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stine K. Krogsrud ◽  
Anders M. Fjell ◽  
Christian K. Tamnes ◽  
Håkon Grydeland ◽  
Paulina Due-Tønnessen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
White Matter ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
White Matter Microstructure

Visuospatial working memory and mathematical ability at different ages throughout primary school

2013 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 182-192 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanne H.G. van der Ven ◽  
Han L.J. van der Maas ◽  
Marthe Straatemeier ◽  
Brenda R.J. Jansen
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Primary School ◽  
Mathematical Ability ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
Different Ages

Do Children With Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) Have Difficulties With Interference Control, Visuospatial Working Memory, and Selective Attention? Developmental Patterns and the Role of Severity and Persistence of DLD

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (9) ◽  
pp. 3036-3050
Author(s):  
Elma Blom ◽  
Tessel Boerma
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Selective Attention ◽  
Language Disorder ◽  
Typically Developing ◽  
Developmental Language Disorder ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
Interference Control ◽  
Developmental Patterns ◽  
Search Tasks ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Many children with developmental language disorder (DLD) have weaknesses in executive functioning (EF), specifically in tasks testing interference control and working memory. It is unknown how EF develops in children with DLD, if EF abilities are related to DLD severity and persistence, and if EF weaknesses expand to selective attention. This study aimed to address these gaps. Method Data from 78 children with DLD and 39 typically developing (TD) children were collected at three times with 1-year intervals. At Time 1, the children were 5 or 6 years old. Flanker, Dot Matrix, and Sky Search tasks tested interference control, visuospatial working memory, and selective attention, respectively. DLD severity was based on children's language ability. DLD persistence was based on stability of the DLD diagnosis. Results Performance on all tasks improved in both groups. TD children outperformed children with DLD on interference control. No differences were found for visuospatial working memory and selective attention. An interference control gap between the DLD and TD groups emerged between Time 1 and Time 2. Severity and persistence of DLD were related to interference control and working memory; the impact on working memory was stronger. Selective attention was unrelated to DLD severity and persistence. Conclusions Age and DLD severity and persistence determine whether or not children with DLD show EF weaknesses. Interference control is most clearly impaired in children with DLD who are 6 years and older. Visuospatial working memory is impaired in children with severe and persistent DLD. Selective attention is spared.

Visual Search Facilitation in Repeated Displays Depends on Visuospatial Working Memory

2012 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela A. Manginelli ◽  
Franziska Geringswald ◽  
Stefan Pollmann
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Visual Search ◽  
Control Experiment ◽  
Memory Load ◽  
Contextual Cueing ◽  
Long Term Memory ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
Working Memory Load ◽  
Memory Resources

When distractor configurations are repeated over time, visual search becomes more efficient, even if participants are unaware of the repetition. This contextual cueing is a form of incidental, implicit learning. One might therefore expect that contextual cueing does not (or only minimally) rely on working memory resources. This, however, is debated in the literature. We investigated contextual cueing under either a visuospatial or a nonspatial (color) visual working memory load. We found that contextual cueing was disrupted by the concurrent visuospatial, but not by the color working memory load. A control experiment ruled out that unspecific attentional factors of the dual-task situation disrupted contextual cueing. Visuospatial working memory may be needed to match current display items with long-term memory traces of previously learned displays.

Where's the square? Strategies and aging in visuospatial working memory

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bailey M. Bonura ◽  
Ayanna K. Thomas ◽  
Holly A. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory

Gestalt effects in visuospatial working memory

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Pieroni ◽  
Clelia Rossi-Arnaud ◽  
Miriam Di Nardo ◽  
Alan D. Baddeley
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory

scholarly journals Does perceptual grouping improve visuospatial working memory? Optimized processing or encoding bias

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Prieto ◽  
Vanesa Peinado ◽  
Julia Mayas
Keyword(s):  
Working Memory ◽  
Change Detection ◽  
Visual Working Memory ◽  
Visual Information ◽  
Detection Accuracy ◽  
Visuospatial Working Memory ◽  
Gestalt Grouping ◽  
Color Similarity ◽  
Automatic Encoding ◽  
Change Detection Performance

AbstractVisual working memory has been defined as a system of limited capacity that enables the maintenance and manipulation of visual information. However, some perceptual features like Gestalt grouping could improve visual working memory effectiveness. In two different experiments, we aimed to explore how the presence of elements grouped by color similarity affects the change detection performance of both, grouped and non-grouped items. We combined a change detection task with a retrocue paradigm in which a six item array had to be remembered. An always valid, variable-delay retrocue appeared in some trials during the retention interval, either after 100 ms (iconic-trace period) or 1400 ms (working memory period), signaling the location of the probe. The results indicated that similarity grouping biased the information entered into the visual working memory, improving change detection accuracy only for previously grouped probes, but hindering change detection for non-grouped probes in certain conditions (Exp. 1). However, this bottom-up automatic encoding bias was overridden when participants were explicitly instructed to ignore grouped items as they were irrelevant for the task (Exp. 2).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document