scholarly journals Next generation sequencing-based gene panel tests for the management of solid tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Nagahashi ◽  
Yoshifumi Shimada ◽  
Hiroshi Ichikawa ◽  
Hitoshi Kameyama ◽  
Kazuaki Takabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals Molecular Diagnostic of Solid Tumor Using a Next Generation Sequencing Custom-Designed Multi-Gene Panel

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dario de Biase ◽  
Giorgia Acquaviva ◽  
Michela Visani ◽  
Viviana Sanza ◽  
Chiara M. Argento ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Gene ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Molecular Diagnostic ◽  
Analytical Sensitivity ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Gene Characterization ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Oncosuppressor Genes

Next generation sequencing (NGS) allows parallel sequencing of multiple genes at a very high depth of coverage. The need to analyze a variety of targets for diagnostic/prognostic/predictive purposes requires multi-gene characterization. Multi-gene panels are becoming standard approaches for the molecular analysis of solid lesions. We report a custom-designed 128 multi-gene panel engineered to cover the relevant targets in 22 oncogene/oncosuppressor genes for the analysis of the solid tumors most frequently subjected to routine genotyping. A total of 1695 solid tumors were analyzed for panel validation. The analytical sensitivity is 5%. Analytical validation: (i) Accuracy: sequencing results obtained using the multi-gene panel are concordant using two different NGS platforms and single-gene approach sequencing (100% of 83 cases); (ii) Precision: consistent results are obtained in the samples analyzed twice with the same platform (100% of 20 cases). Clinical validation: the frequency of mutations identified in different tumor types is consistent with the published literature. This custom-designed multi-gene panel allows to analyze with high sensitivity and throughput 22 oncogenes/oncosuppressor genes involved in diagnostic/prognostic/predictive characterization of central nervous system tumors, non-small-cell lung carcinomas, colorectal carcinomas, thyroid nodules, pancreatic lesions, melanoma, oral squamous carcinomas and gastrointestinal stromal tumors.

scholarly journals Validation of a Next-Generation Sequencing Assay Targeting RNA for the Multiplexed Detection of Fusion Transcripts and Oncogenic Isoforms

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robyn T. Sussman ◽  
Amanda R. Oran ◽  
Carmela Paolillo ◽  
David Lieberman ◽  
Jennifer J. D. Morrissette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Gold Standard ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Fusion Partner ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Fixed Tissue ◽  
Fusion Transcripts ◽  
Genetic Abnormalities ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Context.— Next-generation sequencing is a high-throughput method for detecting genetic abnormalities and providing prognostic and therapeutic information for patients with cancer. Oncogenic fusion transcripts are among the various classifications of genetic abnormalities present in tumors and are typically detected clinically with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). However, FISH probes only exist for a limited number of targets, do not provide any information about fusion partners, cannot be multiplex, and have been shown to be limited in specificity for common targets such as ALK. Objective.— To validate an anchored multiplex polymerase chain reaction–based panel for the detection of fusion transcripts in a university hospital–based clinical molecular diagnostics laboratory. Design.— We used 109 unique clinical specimens to validate a custom panel targeting 104 exon boundaries from 17 genes involved in fusions in solid tumors. The panel can accept as little as 100 ng of total nucleic acid from PreservCyt-fixed tissue, and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens with as little as 10% tumor nuclei. Results.— Using FISH as the gold standard, this assay has a sensitivity of 88.46% and a specificity of 95.83% for the detection of fusion transcripts involving ALK, RET, and ROS1 in lung adenocarcinomas. Using a validated next-generation sequencing assay as the orthogonal gold standard for the detection of EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII) in glioblastomas, the assay is 92.31% sensitive and 100% specific. Conclusions.— This multiplexed assay is tumor and fusion partner agnostic and will provide clinical utility in therapy selection for patients with solid tumors.

37. Clinical validation of somatic alterations in solid tumors by next generation sequencing

2018 ◽  
Vol 226-227 ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Xia Li ◽  
Bryan Austin ◽  
Michael Donovan ◽  
Janet Orton ◽  
Guang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Clinical Validation ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Somatic Alterations ◽  
Generation Sequencing

SAT0531 NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING AND AUTOINFLAMMATORY SYNDROMES: CLINICAL AND GENETICAL CORRELATION ON AN ADULT POPULATION FROM A REFERRAL THIRD-CARE CENTRE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1223-1223
Author(s):  
J. R. Marques Soares ◽  
M. Antolin Mate ◽  
E. Garcia Arumi ◽  
E. Tizzano Ferrari ◽  
S. Bujan Rivas
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Genetic Data ◽  
Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Related Gene ◽  
Unknown Significance ◽  
Level Hospital ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Background:Systemic autoinflammatory diseases (sAID) are a group of conditions with recurrent episodes of inflammation in absence of infection or autoimmune response. Its physiopathology mainly lies on mono/poligenic mutations involving genes related to the innate immune system response. Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platformss have been a big step forward on sAID diagnosis, although a clinical and genetic correlation is still needed.Objectives:To review the sAID related gene panel variants identified using NGS sAID gene panel on a cohort of adult patients screened for sAID from a referral third-level hospital.To correlate genetic and clinical findings for sAID related variants identified in order to the clinical suspicion diagnosis of sAID.Methods:A retrospective review of a cohort of adult (≥ 16 yo) patients with available NGS sAID related gene panel (MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform including intron and exon variants from up to 17 sAID genes, with coverage depth > x100) among 2014 and 2019 was performed.Demographic, clinical and genetic data were collected in a database.Genetic variants were classified according to the American College of Medical Genetics/Association for Molecular Pathology classification as benign/likely benign/variable of unknown significance (VUS)/likely pathogenic/pathogenic. In case of polymorphisms or lack of genetic data, the variants were named as unclassified.A description of the cohort and an analysis of the correlation assessment between clinical data and genetic findings were performed.Results:246 out of 299 (82%) patients with NGS sAID gene panel had clinical data available. 170/246 (69%) were adult patients. The medium age was 48 yo, and the M/F ratio was 2.46. 87/170 (51%) adult patients presented 122 variants involving sAID genes (60/87 patients with a single variant). All the variants out of 7 seven were heterozygous variants.Variants were classified according to ACMG/AMP as follow: pathogenic/probably pathogenic: 22/122 (18%), unknown significance: 74/122 (60.6%), benign/probably benign: 6/122 (4.91%). 20/122 (16.4%) were unclassified variants or polymorphisms.The most frequent variants identified involved MEFV (54/122), NOD2/CARD15 (18/122) and TNFRSF1A (17/122 including 12 p.Arg121Gln variants) genes.37/122 (30%) variants correlated with the clinical picture in 33 patients, allowing to confirm the suspected diagnosis. Among the 122 variants, 7 not previously communicated variants were identified.No somatic variants were found.Conclusion:NGS sAID related gene panel is a useful tool for sAID diagnosis. In this cohort of 170 adult patients from a referral third-level hospital, genetic tests identified sAID related variants in almost half of them.20% of patients who underwent genetic NGS sAID related gene panel studies were finally diagnosed with sAID.The identification of a genetic variant (even pathogenic / likely pathogenic variant) is not diagnostic for sAID if there is not a suggestive clinical picture.Despite genetic findings, a careful evaluation of clinical – genetic correlation is needed to confirm the suspicion diagnosis, especially for low penetrance variants like TNFRSF1A p. Arg121Gln.References:Diagnostic utility of a targeted next-generation sequencing gene panel in the clinical suspicion of systemic autoinflammatory diseases: a multi-center study. Karacan I, Balamir A, Uğurlu S, et al. . Rheumatol Int. 2019 May;39(5):911-919. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04252-5. Epub 2019 Feb 19.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Development and Validation of a Scalable Next-Generation Sequencing System for Assessing Relevant Somatic Variants in Solid Tumors

Neoplasia ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 385-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel H. Hovelson ◽  
Andrew S. McDaniel ◽  
Andi K. Cani ◽  
Bryan Johnson ◽  
Kate Rhodes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Development And Validation ◽  
Generation Sequencing

scholarly journals Next-Generation Sequencing Approach to Non–Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Yields More Actionable Alterations

2017 ◽  
Vol 142 (3) ◽  
pp. 353-357 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitra Mehrad ◽  
Somak Roy ◽  
Humberto Trejo Bittar ◽  
Sanja Dacic
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Lung Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Genomic Alterations ◽  
Generation Sequencing ◽  
Gene Alterations ◽  
Cancer Panel

Context.— Different testing algorithms and platforms for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements in advanced-stage lung adenocarcinoma exist. The multistep approach with single-gene assays has been challenged by more efficient next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a large number of gene alterations. The main criticism of the NGS approach is the detection of genomic alterations of uncertain significance. Objective.— To determine the best testing algorithm for patients with lung cancer in our clinical practice. Design.— Two testing approaches for metastatic lung adenocarcinoma were offered between 2012–2015. One approach was reflex testing for an 8-gene panel composed of DNA Sanger sequencing for EGFR, KRAS, PIK3CA, and BRAF and fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK, ROS1, MET, and RET. At the oncologist's request, a subset of tumors tested by the 8-gene panel was subjected to a 50-gene Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel. Results.— Of 1200 non–small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), 57 including 46 adenocarcinomas and NSCLCs, not otherwise specified; 7 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs); and 4 large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) were subjected to Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel. Ion AmpliSeq Cancer Panel detected 9 potentially actionable variants in 29 adenocarcinomas that were wild type by the 8-gene panel testing (9 of 29, 31.0%) in the following genes: ERBB2 (3 of 29, 10.3%), STK11 (2 of 29, 6.8%), PTEN (2 of 29, 6.8%), FBXW7 (1 of 29, 3.4%), and BRAF G469A (1 of 29, 3.4%). Four SCCs and 2 LCNECs showed investigational genomic alterations. Conclusions.— The NGS approach would result in the identification of a significant number of actionable gene alterations, increasing the therapeutic options for patients with advanced NSCLCs.

scholarly journals Targeted next generation sequencing with an extended gene panel does not impact variant detection in mitochondrial diseases

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Morgane Plutino ◽  
Annabelle Chaussenot ◽  
Cécile Rouzier ◽  
Samira Ait-El-Mkadem ◽  
Konstantina Fragaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Mitochondrial Diseases ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Targeted Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Variant Detection ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Clinical Next-Generation Sequencing Assays for Solid Tumors

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-182
Author(s):  
Susan J. Hsiao ◽  
Dara L. Aisner ◽  
Mark D. Ewalt
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing

Clinical evaluation of a hemochromatosis next-generation sequencing gene panel

2016 ◽  
Vol 98 (3) ◽  
pp. 228-234 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew B. Lanktree ◽  
Bekim Sadikovic ◽  
John S. Waye ◽  
Alexander Levstik ◽  
Bruce B. Lanktree ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Next Generation Sequencing ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Gene Panel ◽  
Next Generation ◽  
Generation Sequencing
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document