scholarly journals Predictive factors of the tumor immunological microenvironment for long-term follow-up in early stage breast cancer

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (1) ◽  
pp. 81-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mina Okabe ◽  
Uhi Toh ◽  
Nobutaka Iwakuma ◽  
Shuko Saku ◽  
Momoko Akashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

scholarly journals Lumpectomy Plus Tamoxifen With or Without Irradiation in Women Age 70 Years or Older With Early Breast Cancer: Long-Term Follow-Up of CALGB 9343

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (19) ◽  
pp. 2382-2387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin S. Hughes ◽  
Lauren A. Schnaper ◽  
Jennifer R. Bellon ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Breast Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Cancer Specific Survival ◽  
Er Positive ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

Purpose To determine whether there is a benefit to adjuvant radiation therapy after breast-conserving surgery and tamoxifen in women age ≥ 70 years with early-stage breast cancer. Patients and Methods Between July 1994 and February 1999, 636 women (age ≥ 70 years) who had clinical stage I (T1N0M0 according to TNM classification) estrogen receptor (ER) –positive breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen plus radiation therapy (TamRT; 317 women) or tamoxifen alone (Tam; 319 women). Primary end points were time to local or regional recurrence, frequency of mastectomy, breast cancer–specific survival, time to distant metastasis, and overall survival (OS). Results Median follow-up for treated patients is now 12.6 years. At 10 years, 98% of patients receiving TamRT (95% CI, 96% to 99%) compared with 90% of those receiving Tam (95% CI, 85% to 93%) were free from local and regional recurrences. There were no significant differences in time to mastectomy, time to distant metastasis, breast cancer–specific survival, or OS between the two groups. Ten-year OS was 67% (95% CI, 62% to 72%) and 66% (95% CI, 61% to 71%) in the TamRT and Tam groups, respectively. Conclusion With long-term follow-up, the previously observed small improvement in locoregional recurrence with the addition of radiation therapy remains. However, this does not translate into an advantage in OS, distant disease-free survival, or breast preservation. Depending on the value placed on local recurrence, Tam remains a reasonable option for women age ≥ 70 years with ER-positive early-stage breast cancer.

Randomized Trial of Long-Term Follow-Up for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: A Comparison of Family Physician Versus Specialist Care

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 848-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eva Grunfeld ◽  
Mark N. Levine ◽  
Jim A. Julian ◽  
Doug Coyle ◽  
Barbara Szechtman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Family Physician ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Early Stage Breast Cancer ◽  
Secondary Outcome ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Usual Practice ◽  
Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Purpose Most women with breast cancer are diagnosed at an early stage and more than 80% will be long-term survivors. Routine follow-up marks the transition from intensive treatment to survivorship. It is usual practice for routine follow-up to take place in specialist clinics. This study tested the hypothesis that follow-up by the patient's family physician is a safe and acceptable alternative to specialist follow-up. Patients and Methods A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial was conducted involving 968 patients with early-stage breast cancer who had completed adjuvant treatment, were disease free, and were between 9 and 15 months after diagnosis. Patients may have continued receiving adjuvant hormonal therapy. Patients were randomly allocated to follow-up in the cancer center according to usual practice (CC group) or follow-up from their own family physician (FP group). The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence-related serious clinical events (SCEs). The secondary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQL). Results In the FP group, there were 54 recurrences (11.2%) and 29 deaths (6.0%). In the CC group, there were 64 recurrences (13.2%) and 30 deaths (6.2%). In the FP group, 17 patients (3.5%) compared with 18 patients (3.7%) in the CC group experienced an SCE (0.19% difference; 95% CI, −2.26% to 2.65%). No statistically significant differences (P < .05) were detected between groups on any of the HRQL questionnaires. Conclusion Breast cancer patients can be offered follow-up by their family physician without concern that important recurrence-related SCEs will occur more frequently or that HRQL will be negatively affected.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document