scholarly journals Baseline carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) serum levels predict bevacizumab‐based treatment response in metastatic colorectal cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 105 (8) ◽  
pp. 996-1001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerald W. Prager ◽  
Kira H. Braemswig ◽  
Alexandra Martel ◽  
Matthias Unseld ◽  
Georg Heinze ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 292-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michal Vočka ◽  
Daniel Langer ◽  
Vladimir Fryba ◽  
Jaromir Petrtyl ◽  
Tomas Hanus ◽  
...  

Objective: Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1) and matrix metalloproteinase 7 (MMP-7) were reported to have potent growth promoting activity. Lack of balance between MMPs and TIMPs is an important factor in the development of gastrointestinal malignancies. Methods: We collected serum samples from 97 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and 79 samples from healthy controls. Serum levels of TIMP-1 and MMP-7 were measured immunochemically and compared with standard tumor markers carcinoembryonic antigen and CA19-9. Results: Serum levels of TIMP-1 and MMP-7 were significantly higher in patients with colorectal cancer compared to healthy controls (both, P < 0.001). TIMP-1 and MMP-7 correlate with the presence of colon involvement (P = 0.001; P = 0.012) and the presence of liver metastases (P = 0.002; P = 0.037), and negatively correlate with pulmonary metastases (P = 0.014; P = 0.005). MMP-7 had similar sensitivity and the same specificity as carcinoembryonic antigen. TIMP-1 and MMP-7 had better sensitivity than CA19-9. TIMP-1 and MMP-7 level correlate with worse outcome (P = 0.002). Conclusion: The results indicate that TIMP-1 and MMP-7 are effective biomarkers in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with good sensitivity. TIMP-1 and MMP-7 levels strongly correlate with the extent of liver disease and have prognostic value.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Hisada ◽  
Yu Takahashi ◽  
Manabu Kubota ◽  
Haruhisa Shimura ◽  
Ei Itobayashi ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in the world. The number of elderly patients with CRC increases due to aging of the population. There are few studies that examined chemotherapy and prognostic factors in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients aged ≥ 80 years. We assessed the efficacy of chemotherapy and prognostic factors among patients with mCRC aged ≥ 80 years. Methods We retrospectively analyzed clinical and laboratory findings of 987 patients newly diagnosed with CRC at Asahi General Hospital (Chiba, Japan) between January 2012 and December 2016. The Kaplan–Meier method was used for the overall survival (OS) and the log-rank test was used to identify difference between patients. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to determine the hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of prognostic factors among super-elderly patients. Results In total, 260 patients were diagnosed with mCRC (super-elderly group: n = 43, aged ≥ 80 years and younger group, n = 217, aged < 80 years). The performance status and nutritional status were worse in the super-elderly group than in the younger group. The OS of super-elderly patients who received chemotherapy was worse than that of younger patients (18.5 vs. 28.8 months; P = 0.052), although the difference was not significant. The OS of patients who received chemotherapy tended to be longer than that of those who did not; however, there were no significant differences in OS in the super-elderly group (18.5 vs. 8.4 months P = 0.33). Multivariate analysis revealed that carcinoembryonic antigen levels ≥ 5 ng/mL (hazard ratio: 2.27; 95% CI 1.09–4.74; P = 0.03) and prognostic nutritional index ≤ 35 (hazard ratio: 8.57; 95% CI 2.63–27.9; P = 0.0003) were independently associated with poor OS in the super-elderly group. Conclusions Patients with mCRC aged ≥ 80 years had lower OS than younger patients even though they received chemotherapy. Carcinoembryonic antigen and prognostic nutritional index were independent prognostic factors in super-elderly patients with mCRC, but chemotherapy was not. Trial registration: retrospectively registered.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tao Song ◽  
Fei Mao ◽  
Li Shi ◽  
Xuemei Xu ◽  
Zirong Wu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Solid tumor tissue testing is the gold standard for molecular-based assays for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This poses challenges during treatment monitoring. Total DNA derived from urine specimens offers clear advantages to track the disease dynamics. Our study aims to evaluate the sensitivity for total DNA recovered from urine and its clinical relevance to mCRC. Methods KRAS mutations in urine specimens were examined in 150 mCRC patients. Baseline concordance was established to determined clinical relevance. The total DNA quantities were also prospectively examined in serial samplings during treatment. Results Analysis of the genetic mutations showed good agreement for baseline samples. Matched tumor and urine specimens’ molecular profiles were observed to have 90% concordance. Comparing with healthy volunteers, we established a cutoff of 8.15 ng that demonstrated elevated total DNA levels was associated with mCRC patients (sensitivity: 90.7%; specificity: 82.0%). For patients treated with chemotherapy or anti-epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, DNA quantity mirrored early treatment response. Survival analysis showed that patients with sustained elevated quantities of KRAS mutations had poorer outcome. Conclusions Total urine DNA offers a viable complement for mutation profiling in mCRC patients, given the good agreement with matched tumor samples. Our study also established that this is specific based on the results from healthy individuals. Serial monitoring of total DNA levels allowed early prediction to treatment response and was effective to identify high risk patients. This is potentially useful to complement current disease management.


2014 ◽  
Vol 20 (13) ◽  
pp. 3560-3568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Binsheng Zhao ◽  
Shing M. Lee ◽  
Hyun-Ju Lee ◽  
Yongqiang Tan ◽  
Jing Qi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document