scholarly journals A randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescent anxiety disorders in a routine clinical care setting with and without parent sessions

2019 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 242-250 ◽  
Author(s):  
Polly Waite ◽  
Tamsin Marshall ◽  
Cathy Creswell
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Adolescent Anxiety ◽  
Routine Clinical Care ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour

GROUP COGNITIVE BEHAVIOUR THERAPY FOR ANGER: A PILOT STUDY

2003 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-83 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Siddle ◽  
Freda Jones ◽  
Fairuz Awenat
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour ◽  
Initial Appointment ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Group Cbt

Patients referred with anger problems often do not attend for treatment. The aim of this study was to determine if group Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT) was feasible. Patients referred for help with their anger were assessed, given 6 sessions of group CBT and re-assessed. Of 119 patients referred, 49 (41%) did not attend the initial appointment. Patients who attended for interview were invited to participate in the group CBT. Only 11 patients (9%) of those referred for therapy attended for the full course of CBT. Thirty-four patients (29%) were exposed to at least one session of CBT, while 66 patients (56%) did not attend for any therapy. Patients who attended for some or all of the CBT treatment reported reductions in the frequency and intensity of their anger outbursts. There was also a significant reduction in measures of their anger traits. It could be concluded that group CBT is an appropriate way to deliver this therapy to patients with anger problems, but it is clear that many of those referred are ambivalent about therapy and will not attend. Figures are given that will allow the planning of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the difference between individual and group based CBT for patients with anger problems.

scholarly journals Cognitive Behaviour Therapy for Bulimia Nervosa and Eating Disorders Not Otherwise Specified: Translation from Randomized Controlled Trial to a Clinical Setting

2014 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 641-654 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Knott ◽  
Debbie Woodward ◽  
Antonia Hoefkens ◽  
Caroline Limbert
Keyword(s):  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Eating Disorder ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Eating Disorder Psychopathology ◽  
Cognitive Behaviour

Background: Enhanced Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT-E) (Fairburn, Cooper and Shafran, 2003) was developed as a treatment approach for eating disorders focusing on both core psychopathology and additional maintenance mechanisms. Aims: To evaluate treatment outcomes associated with CBT-E in a NHS Eating Disorders Service for adults with bulimia and atypical eating disorders and to make comparisons with a previously published randomized controlled trial (Fairburn et al., 2009) and “real world” evaluation (Byrne, Fursland, Allen and Watson, 2011). Method: Participants were referred to the eating disorder service between 2002 and 2011. They were aged between 18–65 years, registered with a General Practitioner within the catchment area, and had experienced symptoms fulfilling criteria for BN or EDNOS for a minimum of 6 months. Results: CBT-E was commenced by 272 patients, with 135 completing treatment. Overall, treatment was associated with significant improvements in eating disorder and associated psychopathology, for both treatment completers and the intention to treat sample. Conclusions: Findings support dissemination of CBT-E in this context, with significant improvements in eating disorder psychopathology. Improvements to global EDE-Q scores were higher for treatment completers and lower for the intention to treat sample, compared to previous studies (Fairburn et al., 2009; Byrne et al., 2011). Level of attrition was found at 40.8% and non-completion of treatment was associated with higher levels of anxiety. Potential explanations for these findings are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document