scholarly journals Barriers and enablers to optimal diabetes care for adults with learning disabilities: A systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ben Holden ◽  
Andrew Lee
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Diabetes Care ◽  
Barriers And Enablers ◽  
Adults With Learning Disabilities

scholarly journals Understanding the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of lifestyle modification interventions in adults with learning disabilities: protocol for a mixed-methods systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dikshyanta Rana ◽  
Sophie Westrop ◽  
Evi Germeni ◽  
Arlene McGarty ◽  
Louisa Ells ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Lifestyle Modification ◽  
Realist Synthesis ◽  
Risk Of Bias ◽  
The Body ◽  
Lifestyle Interventions ◽  
Adults With Learning Disabilities ◽  
Underlying Mechanisms

Abstract Background Adults with learning disabilities have an increased disposition to unhealthy lifestyle behaviours which often occur simultaneously. Existing studies focus on complex interventions targeting unhealthy diet, physical inactivity, sedentary behaviour, smoking, and alcohol use to reduce health risks experienced. It is essential to understand how well these interventions work, what works, for whom, in what context and why. This study aims to investigate the effectiveness and underlying mechanisms of lifestyle modification interventions for adults with learning disabilities. Methods This is a mixed-methods systematic review consisting of a network meta-analysis (NMA) and realist synthesis. Electronic databases (ASSIA, CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO) will be searched from inception to 14 January 2021 with no language restriction. Additionally, trial registries, grey literature databases and references lists will be searched. Studies related to lifestyle modification interventions on the adult population (>18 years) with learning disabilities will be eligible for inclusion. Two independent researchers will screen studies, extract data and assess its quality and risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration’s Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (RoB Version 2) and ROBINS-I. The strength of the body of evidence will be assessed based on the GRADE approach. The NMA will incorporate results from RCTs and quasi-experimental studies to estimate the effectiveness of various lifestyle interventions. Where appropriate, a component NMA (CNMA) will be used to estimate effectiveness. The realist synthesis will complement and explain the findings of NMA and CNMA by including additional qualitative and mixed-methods studies. Studies will be included based on their relevance to the programme theory and the rigour of their methods, as determined by quality appraisal tools appropriate to the study design. Results from both syntheses will be incorporated into a logic model. Discussion The paucity of population-specific lifestyle interventions contributes to the challenges of behaviour change in adults with learning disabilities. This study will provide an evidence-base from which various stakeholders can develop effective interventions for adults with learning disabilities. The evidence will also help prioritise and inform research recommendations for future primary research so that people with learning disabilities live happier, healthier and longer lives. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD 42020223290

Anxiety and Social Adjustment Problems in Adults With Learning Disabilities

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip J. Uy ◽  
Ren Krinick ◽  
Lana A. Tiersky ◽  
Nuri Ruzi ◽  
Mitchell Slugh
Keyword(s):  
Learning Disabilities ◽  
Social Adjustment ◽  
Adjustment Problems ◽  
Adults With Learning Disabilities
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document