scholarly journals PSMA PET/CT imaging for primary staging of intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary J.R. Cook ◽  
Meghana Kulkarni ◽  
Victoria S. Warbey
2021 ◽  
Vol 32 ◽  
pp. S138
Author(s):  
D. Campobasso ◽  
G. Guarino ◽  
M. Scarlattei ◽  
F. Ziglioli ◽  
S. Ferretti ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 69 (3) ◽  
pp. 393-396 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Budäus ◽  
Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah ◽  
Georg Salomon ◽  
Uwe Michl ◽  
Hans Heinzer ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (12) ◽  
pp. 6475-6480 ◽  
Author(s):  
SARA STRANDBERG ◽  
CAMILLA THELLENBERG KARLSSON ◽  
MATTIAS OGREN ◽  
JAN AXELSSON ◽  
KATRINE RIKLUND

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (5) ◽  
pp. 892-899 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aline B. Mattiolli ◽  
Allan Santos ◽  
Andreia Vicente ◽  
Marcelo Queiroz ◽  
Diogo Bastos ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS138-TPS138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hofman ◽  
Declan G. Murphy ◽  
Scott Williams ◽  
Tatenda Nzenza ◽  
Alan Herschtal ◽  
...  

TPS138 Background: Disease persistence or relapse following curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy of high-risk prostate cancer is not uncommon. This is attributable, in part, to a failure of accurate staging with diagnostic imaging being insensitive for detection of small volume metastatic disease. Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a new whole body scanning technique that enables visualisation of prostate cancer with high sensitivity. The hypotheses of this study are that PSMA-PET/CT (a) has improved diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional imaging, (b) should be used as a first-line diagnostic test for staging, (c) the improved diagnostic accuracy will result in significant management impact and (d) provides economic benefits when incorporated into the management algorithm. Methods: This is a 300 patient phase III multi-centre randomized study of patients with untreated high-risk prostate cancer defined by Gleason grade group 3-5, PSA ≥ 20ng/ml or clinical stage ≥ T3. Patients are randomized to Gallium-68-PSMA11 PET/CT or conventional imaging, consisting of computer tomography of the abdomen/pelvis and bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT. Patients with negative, equivocal or oligometastatic disease cross-over to receive the other imaging arm. The primary objective is to compare the accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT to conventional imaging for detecting nodal or distant metastatic disease. Accuracy is defined by a pre-defined “ground truth” scoring system incorporating histopathologic, imaging and clinical follow-up at six months post randomisation. Secondary objectives include comparing management impact, the number of equivocal studies, the incremental value of second-line imaging in patients who cross-over, health economics, radiation exposure, inter-observer agreement and safety of PSMA-PET/CT. Longer term follow-up will also assess the prognostic value of a negative PSMA-PET/CT. 294 of 300 (98%) patients randomised at time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: 12617000005358.


2017 ◽  
Vol 197 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Can Obek ◽  
Tunkut Doganca ◽  
Emre Demirci ◽  
Meltem Ocak ◽  
Ali Riza Kural ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document