The impact of length and location of positive margins in predicting biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a minimum follow-up of 5 years

2014 ◽  
Vol 115 (1) ◽  
pp. 106-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanna Sooriakumaran ◽  
Achilles Ploumidis ◽  
Tommy Nyberg ◽  
Mats Olsson ◽  
Olof Akre ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Positive Margins ◽  
The Impact

Long-term Biochemical Recurrence Rates After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis of a Single-center Series of Patients With a Minimum Follow-up of 5 Years

Urology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nazareno Suardi ◽  
Vincenzo Ficarra ◽  
Pieter Willemsen ◽  
Peter De Wil ◽  
Andrea Gallina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Recurrence Rates

Biochemical Recurrence After Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy in a European Single-centre Cohort with a Minimum Follow-up Time of 5 Years

2012 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 768-774 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prasanna Sooriakumaran ◽  
Leif Haendler ◽  
Tommy Nyberg ◽  
Henrik Gronberg ◽  
Andreas Nilsson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Single Centre ◽  
Robot Assisted

Biochemical Recurrence Following Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Analysis of 1384 Patients with a Median 5-year Follow-up

2010 ◽  
Vol 58 (6) ◽  
pp. 838-846 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mani Menon ◽  
Mahendra Bhandari ◽  
Nilesh Gupta ◽  
Zhaoli Lane ◽  
James O. Peabody ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Robot Assisted

Predictors of biochemical recurrence after Retzius-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Analysis of 359 cases with a median follow-up period of 26 months

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (12) ◽  
pp. 1006-1014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Abdel Raheem ◽  
Ki Don Chang ◽  
Mohammed Jayed Alenzi ◽  
Won Sik Ham ◽  
Woong Kyu Han ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Robot Assisted

scholarly journals Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing approach: surgical technique and one-year functional and oncologic outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tae Young Shin ◽  
Yong Seong Lee
Keyword(s):  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Erectile Function ◽  
Biochemical Recurrence ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Neurovascular Bundle ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Robot Assisted ◽  
Function Recovery ◽  
One Year

Abstract Various neurovascular bundle-sparing techniques have been introduced to maximize recovery of erectile function after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). The clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing technique aims to preserve periprostatic structures and neurovascular bundles as much as possible by avoiding clipping of the vascular pedicles. This study reports 1-year functional and oncologic outcomes and postoperative complications in 105 patients with intact preoperative erectile function who underwent a modified clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing RARP. Intact erectile function was defined as score ≥ 21 on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men questionnaire or ability to have sexual intercourse. Median follow-up was 26.5 months (IQR 15.25–48). Postoperative erectile function recovery rates were 71.4%, 81.9%, 88.6%, 92.4%, and 94.3% at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. The rate of positive surgical margins was 16.2% overall and 11.8% in patients with stage pT2 disease. The biochemical recurrence rate was 6.7% overall. The modified clipless intrafascial neurovascular bundle-sparing technique is safe and feasible and can achieve excellent recovery of erectile function after RARP. Further large-scale prospective comparative studies are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document