scholarly journals What do Demand-Control and Effort-Reward work stress questionnaires really measure? A discriminant content validity study of relevance and representativeness of measures

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 295-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cheryl Bell ◽  
Derek Johnston ◽  
Julia Allan ◽  
Beth Pollard ◽  
Marie Johnston
Keyword(s):  
Work Stress ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Demand Control

scholarly journals Assessing Housing Accessibility for Older Adults in Japan: A Content Validity Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 108-108
Author(s):  
Rumiko Tsuchiya-Ito ◽  
Björn Slaug ◽  
Tomonori Sano ◽  
Miki Tajima ◽  
Sakiko Itoh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Occupational Therapists ◽  
Building Design ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Housing Enabler ◽  
Item List ◽  
Existing Housing ◽  
Rigorous Procedure

Abstract Scientifically validated tools to assess housing accessibility for older adults in Japan have been lacking. To address this, a rigorous procedure of adapting an existing housing assessment tool—the Housing Enabler, developed in Sweden—for valid use in Japan was conducted. The original tool was translated into the Japanese language, using established translation procedures. In the process, researchers checked the appropriateness of technical terms and adjusted specifications to be in accordance with Japanese standards. An expert panel approach was used to validate the content of the Japanese Housing Enabler. Thirteen certified occupational therapists, architects and care-managers (average experience=14.5 years) participated as experts in the content validity study. They rated each item with regard to relevance for assessing housing accessibility in Japan, on a scale from 1(=Not relevant) to 4(= Highly relevant). They suggested adjustments and additions that they found to be relevant to capture particularities of Japanese housing and building design. After individual ratings, the experts gathered for consensus discussions on suggested revisions of the item list. As a result, the number of items was substantially increased (from 161 to 283). A content validity index (CVI) was calculated for each item (i.e., the proportion of experts rating the relevance as at least 3). Using a recommended threshold of CVI ≥0.78, more than 90% of the items were considered relevant, thus supporting the content validity. However, the large amount of items might jeopardize the feasibility of the instrument. Further studies are needed to evaluate feasibility, criterion-related validity and aspects of reliability.

A Content Validity Study of AIMIT (Assessing Interpersonal Motivation in Transcripts)

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Fassone ◽  
Floriana Lo Reto ◽  
Paola Foggetti ◽  
Chiara Santomassimo ◽  
Maria Rita D'Onofrio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Validity Study

Nursing Activity Score for estimating nursing care need in intensive care units: findings from a face and content validity study

2016 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 549-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvisa Palese ◽  
Irene Comisso ◽  
Monica Burra ◽  
Pier Paolo DiTaranto ◽  
Luca Peressoni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Intensive Care Units ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Content Validity ◽  
Activity Score ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Nursing Activity

scholarly journals Age Differences in the Demand—Control Model of Work Stress

2009 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth S. Shultz ◽  
Mo Wang ◽  
Eileen M. Crimmins ◽  
Gwenith G. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Work Stress ◽  
Age Differences ◽  
Control Model ◽  
Demand Control

A content validity study of the test of valuers’ support for capturing sustainability in the valuation process in Nigeria

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-193
Author(s):  
Abayomi Ibiyemi ◽  
Yasmin Mohd Adnan ◽  
Md Nasir Daud ◽  
Segun Olanrele ◽  
Abiodun Jogunola
Keyword(s):  
Content Validity ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Valuation Process
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document