scholarly journals Key findings from the UKCCMP cohort of 877 patients with haematological malignancy and COVID‐19: disease control as an important factor relative to recent chemotherapy or anti‐CD20 therapy

Author(s):  
Stephen Booth ◽  
Helen M. Curley ◽  
Csilla Varnai ◽  
Roland Arnold ◽  
Lennard Y. W. Lee ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 196-196
Author(s):  
Adrian M Shields ◽  
Srinivasan Venkatachalam ◽  
Shankara Paneesha ◽  
Mark Ford ◽  
Tom Sheeran ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Anti-CD20 B cell depleting agents are amongst the most commonly used immunotherapeutics employed in the treatment of haematological malignancy and autoimmune diseases. By inducing peripheral B cell aplasia, anti-CD20 depleting agents are hypothesised to significantly impair serological responses to neoantigens, including the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein within SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Seropositivity following SARS-CoV-2 is the strongest, measurable correlate of protection from severe COVID-19. Understanding the kinetics of B cell reconstitution and vaccine responsiveness following exposure to B cell depleting agents is essential to maximise vaccine efficacy in patients vulnerable to severe COVID-19. Methods: 80 patients with underlying haematological malignancy and 38 patients with underlying rheumatological disease previously treated with anti-CD20 B cell depleting agents were studied following their second dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (median time to sampling: 46.5d, IQR: 33.8-63.3). Lymphocyte subset (CD4, CD8, CD19, CD56/16) enumeration was performed using 6 colour flow cytometry (BD Trucount). Total anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein antibodies were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (The Binding Site, Human Anti-IgG/A/M SARS-CoV-2-ELISA). The relationship between immune reconstitution following B cell depletion and vaccine responsiveness was explored. Results: In the haematology cohort (median age 70y, IQR 60.3-76.0, 62.5% male), overall seropositivity following vaccination was 60.0%. Individuals on active chemotherapy had significantly lower seroprevalence than those vaccinated following the completion of chemotherapy (22.7% vs 74.1%, p<0.0001). In the rheumatology cohort (median age 65y, IQR 58.3-70.8, 39.9% male), overall seropositivity was 69.4%. In both cohorts, vaccine non-responders had significantly smaller populations of peripheral CD19+ B cells (haematology: 0.20 vs 0.02 x10 9/L, p=0.004, rheumatology: 0.07 vs 0.01 x10 9/L, p=0.03). The magnitude of the antibody response following vaccination did not differ between recipients of Tozinameran and Vaxzeveria in either cohort. Vaccine responsiveness was lower in the first 6 months following B cell depletion therapy; 42.9% in the haematology cohort and 33.3% in the rheumatology cohort, increasing to 100% and 75% respectively in individuals receiving their second dose 6-12 months following B cell depletion (Figure 1). B cell reconstitution in the 7-12 month window following B cell depletion was faster in haematology compared to rheumatology patients (77.8% v 22.2% achieving normal B cell count, p=0.005) and associated with improved vaccine responsiveness. However, persistent immunodeficiency occurred in some haematology patients following completion of treatment: 25% of patients who had completed therapy at least 36 months previously failed to respond to vaccination. In this cohort of vaccine non-responders, 83.3% of individuals had B cell numbers within the normal range. These patients had all previously been treated for follicular lymphoma suggesting a specific mechanism for long-range secondary immunodeficiency in these patients. Conclusions: Serological responsiveness to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is poor during active chemotherapy for haematological malignancy and in the first 6 months following B cell depletion, regardless of underlying disease. Vaccine responsiveness significantly improves in the 7-12 month window following B cell depletion. Compared to haematology patients, B cell reconstitution is slower in rheumatology patients and associated with reduced vaccine responsiveness, possibly due to the use of additional concurrent disease-modifying anti-rheumatic therapies. Furthermore, long-term secondary immunodeficiency occurs in a minority of haematology patients. To maximise the efficacy from SARS-CoV-2 booster vaccination and optimal utilisation of available vaccine doses, immunisations should be delivered at least 6 months following the administration of anti-CD20 depleting drugs. Figure 1: Kinetics of return of vaccine responsiveness following B cell depletion in haematology and rheumatology patients. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Paneesha: Roche: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; Gilead: Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; AbbVie: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Drayson: Abingdon Health: Current holder of individual stocks in a privately-held company.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 928-928
Author(s):  
Nancy D. Doolittle ◽  
Rochelle Fu ◽  
Prakash Ambady ◽  
Edward A Neuwelt

Abstract Recent reports propose high-dose (HD) methotrexate (MTX)-based cytoreduction followed by consolidation with HD chemotherapy (HDC) with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line treatment for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL). The main rationale is that HDC-ASCT may improve disease control by achieving higher therapeutic concentrations of cytotoxic chemotherapy in the CNS, thus circumventing the blood-brain barrier (BBB). We have employed an alternative approach to treat PCNSL patients effectively. This first-line treatment enhances delivery of standard dose (SD) MTX-based chemotherapy administered intra-arterially (i.a.) with osmotic BBB opening plus the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb) rituximab, followed in complete responders by anti-CD20 mAb maintenance immunotherapy. The main features that distinguish our approach from HDC-ASCT consolidation are to utilize BBB properties to maximize delivery of SD chemotherapy to the CNS sanctuary, and maintenance immunotherapy to delay recurrence. A multi-center study of 149 PCNSL patients (2,079 i.a. BBB treatments) resulted in one death within 48 hrs after treatment, from pulmonary embolism. Prior to routine use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor, granulocytopenic fever occurred in 3% of BBB treatments (Angelov, J Clin Oncol 2009). This contrasts with HDC-ASCT consolidation which carries substantial morbidity and treatment-related mortality (6% to 9%) (Ferrari, Lancet Hemat 2016; Omuro, Blood 2015). Further, HDC-ASCT is used primarily in younger PCNSL patients (< 60-65 yrs) with good performance status and is not feasible in many PCNSL patients given the median age at diagnosis is 60-65 yrs. First-line enhanced BBB delivery of SD MTX-based chemotherapy in 149 patients provided an overall response rate (ORR) of 82% (58% CR rate) and median overall survival (OS) of 37 mo. In low risk patients (age < 60 yrs and KPS ≥ 70) median OS was approximately 14 yrs. Survivors in CR a minimum of 2 yrs after diagnosis (n = 24) were evaluated with standard neuropsychological tests. Median follow-up was 12 yrs (range 2 to 26 yrs) and results indicated long-term preserved or improved cognitive function (Doolittle, J Clin Oncol 2013). Recently we compared efficacy from two first-line MTX-based regimens: HD MTX (intravenous, 4gr/m2) (Thiel, Lancet Oncol 2010), and enhanced BBB delivery of MTX (i.a., 3.5gr/m2). After adjusting for patient characteristics, CR rate and progression free survival were higher in patients < 65 yrs treated with enhanced delivery of MTX (p < 0.001). When first-line rituximab was added to the i.a. enhanced delivery regimen in 24 patients (median age 64 yrs; median KPS 65), the ORR improved to 92% (75% CR) and OS to 61 mo. To prevent recurrence, Ney (Leuk Lymphoma 2009) treated a small group of patients in CR after standard PCNSL treatment, with maintenance rituximab. The addition of maintenance immunotherapy resulted in average disease control of 22 mo or longer. Consistent with the Ney report, we noted prolonged median CR duration of 38 mo (range: 10 to 85 mo) in a small subset treated with maintenance rituximab (n = 9). Increased survival was also seen in translational laboratory studies of a rodent model of intracerebrally implanted MC116 human B-cell lymphoma cells, using single agent rituximab, whether or not delivered with BBB disruption and whether or not MTX was included (Muldoon, Clin Cancer Res 2011). These results suggest that rituximab slowly leaked into main CNS tumor mass even in absence of BBB opening; and given the long half-life, was trapped by binding to CD20+ on tumor cells, attaining sufficient concentration for antitumor efficacy. Our goal is to maximize first-line enhanced BBB delivery of SD chemotherapy to enable less treatment-related morbidity and mortality than is associated with HDC-ASCT in PCNSL, and increase CR duration. Neurocognitive safety has been demonstrated in long-term survivors treated with BBB delivery. Based on the encouraging results from Ney et al, our pilot data using maintenance rituximab, and translational lab studies of mAb delivery to brain, a new randomized multi-center trial is underway to study the effect of maintenance obinutuzumab on CR duration, neurocognition and quality of life in PCNSL patients who achieve CR following first-line MTX-based chemotherapy (NCT02498951). A trial update will be presented during the ASH 2016 meeting. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 103 (9) ◽  
pp. 3516-3520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ajay K. Gopal ◽  
John M. Pagel ◽  
Nathan Hedin ◽  
Oliver W. Press

Abstract The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab induces remission in 40% to 60% of patients with indolent B-cell lymphoma, but virtually all patients have relapses. We evaluated the efficacy of concurrent administration of another biologic agent, N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) retinamide (4HPR, fenretinide) with rituximab against a variety of human B-cell lymphoma cell lines (Ramos, DHL-4, and FL-18) in vivo. Concurrent 4HPR and rituximab administration prevented tumor progression of lymphoma-bearing mice in a minimal disease model (rituximab + 4HPR, 100% progression free; rituximab alone, 37.5% progression free, P = .01; 4HPR alone, 12.5% progression free, P &lt; .01; controls, 0% progression free, P &lt; .01). Combinations of 4HPR + rituximab exceeded the predicted 50% additive rate of disease control from each agent alone (P = .038). Administering 4HPR and rituximab to mice with established tumors induced complete responses (CRs) in 80% of animals compared with 20% to 40% CRs using either agent alone (P = .07), resulting in significantly improved survival. Tumors harvested from 4HPR + rituximab-treated mice displayed elevated caspase activation compared with untreated controls (P = .02). Adding a broad-spectrum caspase inhibitor in vivo fully abrogated the antitumor effects of 4HPR + rituximab (P = .05). These results establish the efficacy of 4HPR/rituximab combinations, confirm their caspase-mediated mechanism of action, and offer the potential for disease control with minimal toxicity for patients with B-cell malignancies. (Blood. 2004;103:3516-3520)


1975 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 102-105
Author(s):  
Pinkham ◽  
G Ori ◽  
SH Wei ◽  
CA Full ◽  
FM Parkins

2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (3) ◽  
pp. 1363-1370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Brown ◽  
Katy O'Brien ◽  
Kelly Knollman-Porter ◽  
Tracey Wallace

Purpose The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recently released guidelines for rehabilitation professionals regarding the care of children with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Given that mTBI impacts millions of children each year and can be particularly detrimental to children in middle and high school age groups, access to universal recommendations for management of postinjury symptoms is ideal. Method This viewpoint article examines the CDC guidelines and applies these recommendations directly to speech-language pathology practices. In particular, education, assessment, treatment, team management, and ongoing monitoring are discussed. In addition, suggested timelines regarding implementation of services by speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are provided. Specific focus is placed on adolescents (i.e., middle and high school–age children). Results SLPs are critical members of the rehabilitation team working with children with mTBI and should be involved in education, symptom monitoring, and assessment early in the recovery process. SLPs can also provide unique insight into the cognitive and linguistic challenges of these students and can serve to bridge the gap among rehabilitation and school-based professionals, the adolescent with brain injury, and their parents. Conclusion The guidelines provided by the CDC, along with evidence from the field of speech pathology, can guide SLPs to advocate for involvement in the care of adolescents with mTBI. More research is needed to enhance the evidence base for direct assessment and treatment with this population; however, SLPs can use their extensive knowledge and experience working with individuals with traumatic brain injury as a starting point for post-mTBI care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document